Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Accidents and Close Calls
Reload this Page >

Atlas Air 747-8 inflight engine fire

Wikiposts
Search
Accidents and Close Calls Discussion on accidents, close calls, and other unplanned aviation events, so we can learn from them, and be better pilots ourselves.

Atlas Air 747-8 inflight engine fire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2024, 02:58
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Usually on top
Posts: 176
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
I do wonder where this question originates from though - is hours of fuel simply the first box to fill on the ATC incident report form? Or has there been an incident where fuel became a problem?

For any mayday aircraft, getting on the ground ASAP safe and sound is the first priority. ATCs support should probably be aligned with that.
physicus is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 05:46
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Check Airman
I long for the day when ATC stops distracting crews by asking for hours of fuel. If I’m busy with an emergency, that’s the last thing I’m thinking of.

Surely there’s a table they can be provided that gives them a rough conversion to endurance. Any number I give over the radio is probably going to be an equally rough estimate.
I always thought the "fuel on board" request after a MAYDAY related to planning the firefighting response at the airport (or elsewhere). Not "endurance" as such.

- What's the worst-case fire we may have to fight?
- What is the worst-case fuel spill that will need to be foamed and/or cleaned up?
- Do we have sufficient resources?
- Do we need to call off-airport fire services NOW for backup?

ATC requests fuel/passenger information primarily so that it can be forwarded to Crash Fire Rescue (CFR) personnel at the airport where an emergency landing might take place. CFR is very anxious to have this information, as it allows them to act on an informed basis regarding:
  • How many people are to be accounted for
  • How much (or little) fuel will potentially be spilled, or burning
CFR also has detailed information on equipment types and passenger loads that can predict where passengers will be exiting an aircraft. This allows them to concentrate their fire suppression efforts where they will do the most good.
So if you are involved in an emergency, remember that ATC is asking these questions for a good reason—to be able to provide optimal Crash Fire Rescue assistance following an emergency landing.

Source: https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/publicatio...ck/cb_341.htm#
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 06:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 224
Received 15 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
I always thought the "fuel on board" request after a MAYDAY related to planning the firefighting response at the airport (or elsewhere).
No problem with that. But a phone call to the airline’s ops centre would get them that information without distracting the pilots.
Bleve is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 07:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by IBMJunkman
My first thought, too. Hopefully he does a video anyway.
I hope he does too, but if he was on it, then you might have to wait a while, as he won’t be able to say anything until the NTSB are finished.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 07:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 68
Posts: 365
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
To be honest, I’ve always thought the fuel/endurance question was pointless. It’s a 747. Even at min fuel it will have a few tonnes. Or a lot. If it’s all on fire, it probably doesn’t matter.
mrdeux is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 09:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: EDLB
Posts: 363
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think that the ATC controller sounded more nervous than the pilot. Endurance and/or fuel on board may become important if the weather is so poor that the flight need to be redirected or saved and ATC need a clue what alternates make sense. However direct after take of at the same airport souls on board should do, so the firecrew has an idea on how may to rescue in the worst case. The pilot asked for altimeter, wind and weather which is the most important for his pattern planning. Good comms from the pilot and a happy ending. On a Mayday aircraft with engine on fire ATC knows that the pilots are busy with checklists and trouble shooting. So questions from ATC should be kept to a minimum. Too much RT can result in distraction and shutting down the wrong engine. We had examples where that ended in pilots swim operations on a twin.
EDLB is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 14:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Up yer nose, again.
Age: 67
Posts: 1,233
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by physicus
I do wonder where this question originates from though - is hours of fuel simply the first box to fill on the ATC incident report form? Or has there been an incident where fuel became a problem?

For any mayday aircraft, getting on the ground ASAP safe and sound is the first priority. ATCs support should probably be aligned with that.
Google Avianca flight 52.
Peter Fanelli is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 14:59
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bleve
No problem with that. But a phone call to the airline’s ops centre would get them that information without distracting the pilots.
Also one minute of perusing a flight plan will enable people to work the fuel remaining out
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 15:00
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think DGs can be the biggest problem at times
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 15:01
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Totally agree - n.b. the way Jet fuel explodes and burns.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 15:11
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Absolutely correct - often it's like a 40 question form gets pulled out. Having been polite during a major event I had to tell a controller to shut up, "Standby, I'll advise, I'm busy" and he still went on. Sorry but, with respect, on most occasions there is almost nothing he/she can do to help. That's why a maday call helps so much ie you tell them politely what you are doing, you do not request permission - my comments are from world wide experience and of course don't apply to many, many controllers. Listen to the incredible ATC transcript of the 777 Heathrow crash from a few years ago - magnificent management by the controller. Just perfect.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 17:50
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,507
Received 113 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Good Business Sense
Also one minute of perusing a flight plan will enable people to work the fuel remaining out
Unless the Mayday has dumped or leaked fuel.......

ATC might not have that info on their 'strip' and not have time to pull up the full flight plan. Also they will be busy themselves diverting other aircraft around the Mayday flight amongst other things.

Wouldn't take PM very long to read out total fuel on board to ATC when they have a moment. Or if not; then "stand by" until they do.

Uplinker is online now  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 19:19
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
C'mon, guys!

ATC is asking for your FOB so they have an idea of just how large an "improvised explosive device" you are now flying - should the worst happen.

Unless the MAYDAY is specifically a fuel emergency, ATC has no interest at all in your "endurance" - they assume that both you and they want you safely on the ground ASAP.

Commercial jets with a dispatch office are not the only aircraft in the sky. It is a standard question asked of all MAYDAY aircraft - from a C172 to a King Air to a Citation to an A380. With or without dispatch, possibly even without a filed flight plan.

It is certainly not the highest priority question, and in an ideal world, a controller will always append " ,when able" when asking for FOB and SOB. They understand (or should) "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate - in that order." But it is part of their job to ask.
..........

On a more apropos note, reports of a "softball-sized" (~15cm) hole found in the wing above the failed engine.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 20:16
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: EDLB
Posts: 363
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think it is a bit more sensible. In normal operation RT with ATC has a high priority, because any failure will easy get you in more trouble then other errors.
In a Mayday emergency you have all hands and both brains full working to deal with the emergency. If you are additional forced to control the controller a lot of attention is redirected.
There is no need that ATC second guesses your fuel situation or other things if it will have no bearing to the outcome.
You are in a maximum stress situation, so aviate, navigate and trouble shoot will have priority to communicate. If you need help from ATC you will always ask.
EDLB is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 20:32
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Usually on top
Posts: 176
Received 16 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Peter Fanelli
Google Avianca flight 52.
AFAIK, that one resulted in the mayday fuel terminology, along with the syllabus I was part of in the 1990s that made it clear that as PIC you are to use the words mayday mayday mayday in an emergency situation. It is then incumbent on ATC to get me on the ground with minimum track miles, minimum distractions, and moving everybody else out of the way. I don't think it is (or should be) ATCs job to determine how long they can keep me in the air...

The actual amount of fuel is irrelevant for the firefighting response. My aircraft type determines the level of crash response required at the airport, and that category is determined based on many other factors, not just fuel capacity. See https://skybrary.aero/articles/rescu...hting-services
physicus is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2024, 20:42
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: FL95
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pattern_is_full
C'mon, guys!

ATC is asking for your FOB so they have an idea of just how large an "improvised explosive device" you are now flying - should the worst happen.
I've often wondered and I'm genuinely interested to learn from someone with inside knowledge if it does make a difference if such a fuel bomb has 15 or 50 tons of FOB.
My educated guess is that other boundary conditions of that impact site have a far greater influence on the outcome and the number of trucks being rolled is not dependent on FOB.
C2H5OH is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 05:36
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Uplinker
Unless the Mayday has dumped or leaked fuel.......

ATC might not have that info on their 'strip' and not have time to pull up the full flight plan. Also they will be busy themselves diverting other aircraft around the Mayday flight amongst other things.

Wouldn't take PM very long to read out total fuel on board to ATC when they have a moment. Or if not; then "stand by" until they do.
Fair point, however, my thoughts are that distractions are by far the biggest danger in those emergency situations and to interrupt the crew's focus as they run multiple checklists for a FOB readout, which hopefully the actions of the crew will avoid becoming of value, is not ideal. For example, the findings in the BMI 737 at EMA report.

I think sometimes it's a big alligator you're wrestling and you just don't need the interruptions unless it will significantly assist you. In the example I mentioned, an engine blew climbing through 37,000 and we simultaneously depressurised rapidly so, with masks on, we were doing an engine shutdown checklist (and a few others - it was complex) whilst actioning a rapid depressurisation profile as we diverted on an ETOPS sector on the A330 which I'm sure you know well. It was also my line check with the Chief Pilot on the jump seat :-) Also had another, a fire this time, on the 330 in the climb high level which looked identical to the video of the Atlas but at night ......... less fraught than the first one so our ATC exchange was similar and it was also in a first world ATC environment.

Rgds

Last edited by Good Business Sense; 21st Jan 2024 at 06:00.
Good Business Sense is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 05:41
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: US
Posts: 507
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
ATC deals with a lot of traffic

Something to remember is ATC is not just dealing with commercial traffic. Post # 22 provides a very good explanation of why these questions are asked. I had an emergency once in my little bug smasher, 5 on board + dog and maybe 60 gallons. Alternator failed and I was losing electric power. At the time I was on with NY Approach a few miles from Teterboro- so they had to deal with me along with all the other GA , business and heavies a few thousand feet above me. There was no dispatch for them to call, there was a flight plan on file. NJ in that area is quite rural and if I went off airport I can see why they would want to have that info for the local EMS. It was a solid VMC day, I had a handheld and motored back to home for a no flap landing.
NYC Approach as usual were great and followed me back home. Including a phone call when I was on the ground to make sure all was good.
I have listened to a few emergencies on the frequency and the controllers are alway deferential to the pilots. I've heard "later" at least once.
There really seems to be a thing on here with picking at American ATC. I flew my little machine around the NYC airspace for 8 years and always received amazing service.
20driver is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 00:09
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,952
Received 398 Likes on 210 Posts
From the FAA AIM Emergency Procedures 6-3-2-3
  • If distress, MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAY-DAY; if urgency, PAN-PAN, PAN-PAN, PAN-PAN.
  • Name of station addressed.
  • Aircraft identification and type.
  • Nature of distress or urgency.
  • Weather.
  • Pilots intentions and request.
  • Present position, and heading; or if lost, last known position, time, and heading since that position.
  • Altitude or flight level.
  • Fuel remaining in minutes.
  • Number of people on board.
  • Any other useful information.
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publ...section_3.html
megan is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 08:43
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Sudbury, Suffolk
Posts: 256
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So that implies that the question is not around how much firefighting there might be, but how long before landing MUST happen, which makes sense.
Maninthebar is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.