FAA measures to reduce operating costs
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 422
Likes: 5
From: 5° above the Equator, 75° left of Greenwich
FAA measures to reduce operating costs
FAA warns sequestration will lead to long flight delays by April | ATWOnline
Just read this article on ATW stating that delays at airports could be "up to 90 minutes" because of the measures they will implement to reduce their operating costs. Troublesome, perhaps, worrying, maybe not. That is up until this bit though:
Beg you pardon? 
Beg you pardon?
How exactly is reducing efficiency of anything, really, a mean to "maintain the highest safety standard"?
They either picked a poor set of words or they are just completely out of their minds. I think most will choose the latter...
Just read this article on ATW stating that delays at airports could be "up to 90 minutes" because of the measures they will implement to reduce their operating costs. Troublesome, perhaps, worrying, maybe not. That is up until this bit though:
The FAA spending reductions will begin to take effect in April, when the “vast majority” of the agency’s 47,000 employees will be furloughed for 1-2 days per two-week pay period, the officials said. They added that FAA plans to close more than 100 ATC towers at smaller airports and will “reduce preventative maintenance and equipment provisioning and support for all [national airspace] equipment.”
Because of the cuts, FAA “may reduce the efficiency of the national airspace in order to maintain the highest safety standards,” LaHood and Huerta wrote.
How exactly is reducing efficiency of anything, really, a mean to "maintain the highest safety standard"?
They either picked a poor set of words or they are just completely out of their minds. I think most will choose the latter...
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,723
Likes: 2,093
From: Reading, UK
They either picked a poor set of words or they are just completely out of their minds. I think most will choose the latter...
may reduce the efficiency of the national airspace in order to maintain the highest safety standards
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: UK
The fact that the government will continue paying huge grants to joke airports that have no passengers and no flights just goes to show how messed up their spending priorities are.
The FAA spreading these stories is all just part of the politics of trying to paint forthcoming cuts as bad for the public when there are plenty of areas that could be cut first.....
In Oklahoma, tiny airport attracts federal money, but few planes - The Washington Post
The FAA spreading these stories is all just part of the politics of trying to paint forthcoming cuts as bad for the public when there are plenty of areas that could be cut first.....
In Oklahoma, tiny airport attracts federal money, but few planes - The Washington Post
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: USA
The grant program referenced in that story is funded exclusively by a specific tax on airline tickets. It does not come out of the same federal budget as the operating expenses of the federal government.
I agree that the spending priorities in DC are completely cattywompus but the aviation grant program is not a good example. It does, in fact, with designated funding, help with the maintenance and improvement of the aviation infrastructure. If the grant program is to be eliminated, they need to eliminate the ticket tax which funds it at the same time.
The entire US government, all three branches, should be tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail.
I agree that the spending priorities in DC are completely cattywompus but the aviation grant program is not a good example. It does, in fact, with designated funding, help with the maintenance and improvement of the aviation infrastructure. If the grant program is to be eliminated, they need to eliminate the ticket tax which funds it at the same time.
The entire US government, all three branches, should be tarred, feathered and run out of town on a rail.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: USA
so i am paying taxes on my airline ticket for airport that has no use, great.
maybe the FAA should shut down the side that does nothing but do as the ailines want, you know like give airline certificates out as handing out lolly pops which makes it difficult for a pilot to make a proper income, and leave the controllers and inspectors alone.
maybe the FAA should shut down the side that does nothing but do as the ailines want, you know like give airline certificates out as handing out lolly pops which makes it difficult for a pilot to make a proper income, and leave the controllers and inspectors alone.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: guess where...
Originally Posted by galant1
so i am paying taxes on my airline ticket for airport that has no use, great.
Ciudad Real Central Airport - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Castellón Airport - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
International airport of the Region of Murcia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And I thought "Spain is different"
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
FAA Says Warning Of Air Traffic Control Towers Closures Was Unauthorized.
CNN (3/1, Ahlers) reported, "Two days after a Federal Aviation Administration official told contractors that steps were being taken to shut down 168 air traffic control towers on April 1, the agency gave the towers an unexpected reprieve Friday, saying the official's comments were 'unauthorized.'" Yet the conversation in which the statement was made "included FAA officials and representatives of all three contractors who operate FAA control towers in the United States."
The story noted that "about 250 of the nation's 374 towers are staffed by contractors," and according to "a 2011 report by the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General, they "cost on average $537,000 a year to operate, compared to $2 million for comparably busy FAA-staffed towers."
(Whoa! What's that last line again??)
The story noted that "about 250 of the nation's 374 towers are staffed by contractors," and according to "a 2011 report by the Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General, they "cost on average $537,000 a year to operate, compared to $2 million for comparably busy FAA-staffed towers."
(Whoa! What's that last line again??)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 556
Likes: 94
From: Waters edge
Contract towers
Barit - here is the audit report on FAA costs:
DOT - Contract Towers Continue To Provide Cost-Effective and Safe Air Traffic Services, but Improved Oversight of the Program Is Needed | Office of Inspector General it's worth reading the PDF.
Meanwhile....
Lots of media manipulation over the past days on FAA sequestration impacts, most of it fluff.
Scandalous in fact, FAA getting less and less reliable and more and more like French ATC for consistency these days.
DOT - Contract Towers Continue To Provide Cost-Effective and Safe Air Traffic Services, but Improved Oversight of the Program Is Needed | Office of Inspector General it's worth reading the PDF.
Meanwhile....
Lots of media manipulation over the past days on FAA sequestration impacts, most of it fluff.
Scandalous in fact, FAA getting less and less reliable and more and more like French ATC for consistency these days.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The sky is falling! ... Ummm, nevermind...
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: UK
Mail warning to prepare for the worst... but things don't seem too bad... yet!
Assume the brace position: Airport delays to get even longer from today as thousands of air traffic controllers are furloughed | Mail Online
Assume the brace position: Airport delays to get even longer from today as thousands of air traffic controllers are furloughed | Mail Online
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: On the western edge of The Moor
Moderator
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
FAA staffing returns to normal tonight
FAA says air travel system to be normal Sunday night - Yahoo! Finance
(Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said on Saturday it had suspended all employee furloughs and that it expects the U.S. air travel system to return to normal by Sunday evening Eastern Time.
The suspension follows passage on Friday of a bill allowing the agency to shift money within its budget to halt furloughs of air-traffic controllers that started April 21.
The furloughs, prompted by automatic budget cuts, caused thousands of flight delays and hundreds of cancellations throughout the week. The FAA said in a statement on Saturday that it expects staffing to return to normal levels over the next 24 hours.
Airports around the country were reporting that flights were arriving and departing on time at 1 p.m. EDT, with the exception of San Francisco, where arrivals were delayed 44 minutes on average because of construction, the FAA said.
(Reuters) - The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said on Saturday it had suspended all employee furloughs and that it expects the U.S. air travel system to return to normal by Sunday evening Eastern Time.
The suspension follows passage on Friday of a bill allowing the agency to shift money within its budget to halt furloughs of air-traffic controllers that started April 21.
The furloughs, prompted by automatic budget cuts, caused thousands of flight delays and hundreds of cancellations throughout the week. The FAA said in a statement on Saturday that it expects staffing to return to normal levels over the next 24 hours.
Airports around the country were reporting that flights were arriving and departing on time at 1 p.m. EDT, with the exception of San Francisco, where arrivals were delayed 44 minutes on average because of construction, the FAA said.
