Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > USA
Reload this Page >

LAHSO in the US


Notices
USA Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

LAHSO in the US

Old 13th January 2012 | 03:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Europe
LAHSO in the US

I am doing some research on Land and Hold Short operations.
Are there any airlines/operators who do not participate in LAHSO as a matter of company SOP?

regards
ozineurope is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2012 | 03:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 1
From: Playing Golf!
BAW do not... Infact I dont think any UK.. Maybe EU-OPS operators do.
PT6A is offline  
Reply
Old 19th January 2012 | 15:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: New York USA
LAHSO in the US

Dear OZ in Europe,
LAHSO is a voluntary program by which airlines can choose to subscribe to. If they are approved by the FAA (CAA in Europe), they are given specific airports where they are approved to conduct LAHSO. Usually these are busy airports that have concurrent operations on intersecting runways, such as LGA, BOS, or MDW, to name a few.
When it comes down to it, however, it is the PIC who ultimately decides if he or she wants to accept the LAHSO clearance at the time, given the weather conditions at the time of arrival. Exact approval or disapproval of an air carrier's LAHSO authority can be found in the airline's Operations Specifications. The Ops Specs is a document agreed upon by the airline and the FAA. For the pilots concerned, a violation of Ops Specs is also a violation of FARs. I hope this helps.
Fly Safe!
Heavy D
Heavy D is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2012 | 01:46
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Thanks Heavy and PT6.

To paraphrase - LAHSO is only available to operators who have an LOA/approval with/from FAA and only to specific aerodromes. Correct?

Just trying to establish some international practice for a review being conducted in Oz.

cheers
ozineurope is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2012 | 14:01
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
The UK CAA recommended that LAHSO clearances were not accepted by UK operators after a BA aircraft had an incident in about 2000 at ORD. As a result, BA, Virgin Atlantic and the RAF didn't allow the procedure. This was a few years ago and may have changed - but I doubt it.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Reply
Old 20th January 2012 | 16:32
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 345
Likes: 38
From: Lander, WY, USA
A few years ago, at 3 out of 3 different small Part 135 charter companies I worked for (piston twins, turboprops, Citations), we were NOT approved for LAHSO in our Ops Specs. It was my impression that Not Approved was the norm for most operators (of that class), and that approval for LAHSO would be the exception, in general.
340drvr is offline  
Reply
Old 21st January 2012 | 03:37
  #7 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 30
From: Texas
Yes, only certain airports. Usually they'll have intersecting runways or a taxi path from an outboard runway that crosses an inboard runway. DFW is a good example. Both the cargo carriers I've worked for since the program started have not participated. Training department didn't want to develop another program ad operations didn't want to pay for more landing data they'd hardy use and not benefit from.
MarkerInbound is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2012 | 07:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: O/S
Ops Spec A027

Here is an example of the Ops Specs for a small charter operation.

A027 is the Ops Spec relating to LAHSO for US airlines who wish to participate.
Brindabella is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.