Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > USA
Reload this Page >

Virgin America

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
USA Still the busiest region for commercial aviation.

Virgin America

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st February 2007 | 17:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: 104E
Virgin America

Does anyone know the status of Virigin America being allowed to operate in the USA yet? Last I heard was they were still denied a certificate but the crews were still getting trained in Miami at Airbus.

I have a friend that left to work there and was wondering what the scoop was.

I also wonder how Virgin will treat the crews without a contract.
On Final is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2007 | 15:50
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
http://www.letvafly.com/

I flew with a guy last night who was recently hired by VA but decided to pass. Didn't want to lose his current seniority for a job that may not exist, must have been a tough call to make cause he lives in SFO also.
weasil is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd February 2007 | 16:59
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: usa
stay away from VA, $95/hr for CA is a joke
HurryUp&Retire is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 00:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: USA
I don't see Virgin America going through anytime soon.
NE_Pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 01:03
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: 104E
Virgin America

I wondered what was going on and feel there may be some issues before they are allowed to fly if ever.

Thanks, for the replys....
On Final is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 07:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: On Your Six
Latest rumor was VA is leasing their A320s to some foreign carriers.
airbus2boeing is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 13:34
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
5th Freedom vs. cabotage

Fifth Freedom rights include the rights of foreign air carriers to carry passengers between other countries, outside its own; cabotage is the right of foreign air carriers to fly domestic flights inside another country.

Would Sir Branson, BA or the British Government, for example, object to Cubana or Lloyd Aero Boliviano, or Bangladesh Biman, to set up shop in the UK and operate 20 flights per day between LHR and MAN . . . to generate hard currency?
GlueBall is offline  
Reply
Old 28th February 2007 | 19:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
From: US
Aero-news is reporting that VA is leasing out their aircraft: http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?C...b-eaea9d06c42f
OFBSLF is offline  
Reply
Old 1st March 2007 | 01:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach
I never thought that whole thing was a good idea. Now it seems like they themselves are starting to agree.
flyboyike is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2007 | 01:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: PHX USA
There are 2 sitting on the ramp in SFO. Been there for months...rusting...
Lil Bro is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2007 | 17:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
From: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
After reading Richard Branson's autobiography, I doubt he would mind Lloyd Aereo Boliviano operating in the UK if they bring some of that famous Bolivian export.
Panama Jack is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2007 | 06:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: US
Let's start an alternative website - www.letvadie.com

The last thing the industry needs is another discounter with pathetic pay rates.
noflow is offline  
Reply
Old 10th March 2007 | 15:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Ormond Beach
Originally Posted by noflow
The last thing the industry needs is another discounter with pathetic pay rates.
Amen to that!
flyboyike is offline  
Reply
Old 12th March 2007 | 04:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
They re-applied for permission to operate with the FTC. But the process will take at least another three weeks.

They hired some heavy hitters to shake things up (George Bush Sr. Chief of Staff to name one).

So I wouldn't count them out yet, but its laughable how much money they are spending trying to get past all the sharks (Continental, United, Delta, etc).

Wait and see.
Dutch74 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th March 2007 | 16:00
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
From: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Remember the dirty crap American pulled trying to stop Southwest from getting going when they started
ironbutt57 is offline  
Reply
Old 14th March 2007 | 21:36
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: LGW
Its not one sided!!!

The feeling is quite the same on the Eastern side of the pond. Open skies to let the American masses into LHR - dont think so. Just hope Tony Blair and the mob have the b@lls to say NO!

Not a rant - I just like things to be kept fair. My company would find it very difficult to compete without the protection of Ch11 that the yanks enjoy.

Just a thought......
Boeing Freak is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.