![]() |
It's a moot point anyway if the accommodation allowance isn't available to new joiners.
|
Originally Posted by Stocious
(Post 10491648)
It's a moot point anyway if the accommodation allowance isn't available to new joiners.
|
Originally Posted by PorridgeStirrer
(Post 10491557)
32k AED plus 14k AED accommodation allowance totals 46k AED, which at today’s rate is €11,050/£9,850. |
Originally Posted by Ex-Brazilian
(Post 10491607)
Just out of curiosity, about buying property in Dubai... of course it sounds interesting to get a "free house from the airline"
But how easy is to sell it when you decide is time to go home? And also putting 100k from your own money in such a unstable market... sounds discouraging. I'm not sure if I would take this allowance instead of the company accomodation. Not to mention, if you get in trouble in Dubai or EK, you will end up with a huge debt. |
Originally Posted by ExDubai
(Post 10491832)
Standard is Company accommodation, either a flat or a villa. The only way to get the allowance in cash is if you buy a property in Dubai. But if hard cash is the motivator, you’d be better off joining flydubai in the first place. (Upgrade at 2.5 years). Especially for a stint under 10 years. |
Originally Posted by Yorkshire_Pudding
(Post 10491025)
I think If you outright reject the BA course offer for another job, you wont be offered re-assessment in the future. That door could be firmly closed. Ps. Please come back and tell us what you have decided! |
Originally Posted by giggitygiggity
(Post 10492090)
Is that an official policy? If it is then BA sounds charming. You might have a million valid reasons for turning them down at that point. If the door is to remain closed after that, then is that the kind of company you want to work for?
|
To put it as simply as I can, go to BA if you want more control over your lifestyle, or go to EK if you want quicker career progression and/or a greater ability to earn more sooner. However, as has already been said, EK is no longer as financially lucrative as it used to be. |
Originally Posted by Emma Royds
(Post 10494612)
To put it as simply as I can, go to BA if you want more control over your lifestyle, or go to EK if you want quicker career progression and/or a greater ability to earn more sooner. However, as has already been said, EK is no longer as financially lucrative as it used to be. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. Simply put, BA is no longer what they used to be, the airline has been destroyed. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. |
Originally Posted by xwindflirt
(Post 10496060)
except junior bods have next to no control under JSS now. |
Originally Posted by ExDubai
(Post 10496868)
Same like EK BA vs. EK? I can't believe anybody can even ask the question. |
Originally Posted by BigGeordie
(Post 10496874)
Senior Bods have not control at EK. We do not have a bidding system, we have a "roster optimisation system". Optimised for the company that is, not the crew.
BA vs. EK? I can't believe anybody can even ask the question. |
Originally Posted by Dupre
(Post 10496410)
I am extremely junior (>90% down my list) and what makes it bearable is the swapping. I get nothing i want from JSS but can often get a good roster by swapping. It helps living close to base and being flexible.
I don't know much about EK - the Middle East has never appealed (yet). But JSS is certainly making those in the lower third of BA's ranks (myself included) think long and hard about whether it's worth it any more. BA have historically always paid less than the competitors in the early years, but have instead offered lifestyle options and a decent pay-scale, pension and rostering system. I'd argue at least 3 out of 4 of those no longer exist. Personally I think if you're young, and can afford to sacrifice 5 years of your life, BA might still be worth it in the long run - IF you want long haul. Bear in mind however - as mentioned elsewhere, the company want long haul trips to become 24 hour night stops in airport hotels. If that happens, there'll be no point whatsoever. |
Originally Posted by FACoff
(Post 10497145)
Roster swapping does indeed help to mitigate the failings of JSS for the juniors. Successfully doing so however means being married to your iPad and obsessively checking every single open time notification to get something satisfactory (because let's face it, no-one's going to swap their midweek LCA for your weekend 2 day 6). For me as a junior, the hours I spend trying to piece together a sensible roster probably rise into double digits every month.
Mrs. Dupre gets quite annoyed at the amount of time I'm glued to the ipad. |
Originally Posted by Dupre
(Post 10497401)
A very, very good point!
Mrs. Dupre gets quite annoyed at the amount of time I'm glued to the ipad. |
Originally Posted by AIMINGHIGH123
(Post 10497327)
Because that’s how bad it has got at BA. Guys have gone back to EK. Even if you don’t know people personally just go on LinkedIn and can see it. Guys left BA for Jet2. |
Originally Posted by Emma Royds
(Post 10503199)
Attrition at BA which is not due to retirements will be negligible compared to EK. The numbers of those moving from EK to BA or at least trying to, will far outweigh any making the move in the reverse direction or those wanting to leave BA for elsewhere. Those that do leave BA to continue flying, will almost always do it for lifestyle reasons and BA trumps EK on lifestyle, irrespective of how upbeat you try and portray EK from a lifestyle perspective. The million dollar question is if this disparity will continue to exist in favour of BA pilots, in the years and decades ahead.
|
I joined with an ex EK chap in 2015 on the 320, so there must be at least one........ |
A couple on A380. |
If you fancy money, prostitutes and do not care about living in a dictatorship you choose EK. If you are British and aspire any form of family life you choose BA. if you are a European, and you do not wish to live in a 2nd world class system you don’t go to either of them. All jokes aside: do your 5 years in EK, get ur command, and then enjoy a far inferior package at RYR or Norwegian in a base you do not fancy or you just do the time in BA / Virgin / AF / KLM / Luftie / Ezy etc and go part time and enjoy life. |
Originally Posted by SaulGoodman
(Post 10504293)
If you fancy money, prostitutes and do not care about living in a dictatorship you choose EK. If you are British and aspire any form of family life you choose BA. if you are a European, and you do not wish to live in a 2nd world class system you don’t go to either of them. All jokes aside: do your 5 years in EK, get ur command, and then enjoy a far inferior package at RYR or Norwegian in a base you do not fancy or you just do the time in BA / Virgin / AF / KLM / Luftie / Ezy etc and go part time and enjoy life. Second one already is not really correct anymore - e.g. RYR new CLA deal in Italy for instance is really not bad IF it is a base you want and you DO NOT need to commute. Fine for me, I enjoy 5/4 and a not really bad salary(actually a better one that I had during my fantastic time with Qatar in the other dictatorship due to a very very bad Euro-Dollar exchange rate many years ago). If you join one of the other gigs you mentioned as an experienced skipper AND you make it really into the mainline(seems BA went already a bit down the drain) then it means you go RH seat for at least 10 years again HOW could that be anything ok financially but as well "quality of life wise"? EZY might be ok(maybe a bit to much "british company culture" for a mainland european, but hey. Problem with EZY is the very limited availability of good bases so you would not need to commute back and forth between work and family - HOW would that make you enjoy life? Very onesided review of yours I must say. RYR has it's defintive downsides BUT the 5/4 on your base that you are living at with your family(preferably Italy as it is pretty good tax and salary wise on a RYR contract), THAT is QUALITY of life. Every day at home, NO commute, good salary. To be honest it is much more likely to get a base you DO fancy in RYR then it would be in any other company you mentioned. Simple as that. There are all the known downsides in RYR(my god, I buy a black trouser and use the white shirts of my previous employers, big deal), I always prefer to be AT HOME with my family and not anymore in bloody hotels all around the world. Again - THAT is quality of life. Who cares which paintjob the bird has, honestly. Grow up. |
Originally Posted by Right Engine
(Post 10503569)
I’ve never met an ex-EK pilot in BA though. Where are they? I personally know one who is about to jump soon with another not far behind. |
Tbh every airline is in a race to the bottom. Please someone tell me where the perfect airline is because I can tell you one thing it’s sure not our legacy carriers in the UK. If you join BA long haul your more then likely end up with 5 trips a month with just 2 days off between trips. Not really that different from EK, albeit on a lot less pay. Ok you could argue that after gaining some seniority you may be able to gain some control. But who knows? The question I ask myself is if I stay at BA and wait it out it will take me 18 years for a long haul command whose to say management wouldn’t have reduced terms and conditions even further, seems very plausible given their current record. BA management have taken away final salary pension and increased the pay scale timelines from 25 years to 35 years before you earn top salaries. Talk of moving to 24 hour layovers on routes where they can get away with it. What will they take from me in anther 10 years? Cathay used to be the airline of choice for many but now look at what management have done to that gig scale D has now been introduced as far as I’m aware hardly enough to live on in Hong Kong. To those i would say earn the money whilst you can clear your debts and then look improving your quality of life. Flying 900 hours a year till your 65 Is not sustainable and unfortunately we are now the new generation of pilots who will be tasked to do this. Choose wisely and best of luck. |
On an EK roster how do you manage sleep? Is it doable or is it prolonged suffering? How often do people do controlled rest in the seat during midnight turnarounds? Does anyone have figures for how much a person can expect to spend on food, going out and running a car in Dubai? 5 years into EK (assuming you haven’t got your command yet), what can you expect the salary to be? How much would your provident fund be worth at that time? thanks!!! |
You’ll get a lot of abuse with that username, Alex :} |
The Middle East is sustainable for a few years. Save some cash, tick a few boxes and get the t-shirts. Then find an opportunity and join a European airline that gets you close or where you want to be. |
10 years and then some at EK on the 777, and I can gladly as well as happily say I escaped with both my health and sanity intact.
Whilst BA might not be the place it was 10 to 15 years ago, it is night and day vs EK. Plenty have left EK and ended up at BA, mostly via RYR or Norwegian rather than directly. Do yourself a big fat favour, and if you have the option, choose BA over EK. |
It’s night and day now Monarch man but 24 LH layovers and all the trimmings set by other airlines like EK are on the agenda for management. It’s only a matter of time before they have us stopping in airport hotels too. Will you be so keen to sing the praises of BA then? Make no mistake the people running this airline are utterly contemptible. You can almost forgive the Arabs, they know no better. These people are from Western civilization and are corrupted, the worst embodiment of greedy capitalism there is. |
Rex, first of all NEVER underestimate living in a land where the rule of law is applied equally and fairly for the vast majority, secondly last time I checked, organisations such as BALPA have offered a set of checks and balances to the megalomaniac tendencies of various management types. BA isn’t perfect, but version 2019 still pi55es over EK for quality of life. If however you are a hard bruncher, you enjoy living in an unequal and unfair society where your fellow expat will happily throw you under the bus to further themselves financially with no recourse..check and balances or right of appeal, the EK is the place for you. I won’t bother you with the other minor details with respect rostering, the theft of flight pay and overtime or the “flexible” approach to FTLs and operational policies. |
Rex
Until the day that EK embraces the concept of part time working, BA will always be a step above when it comes to lifestyle. The Arabs are less of a concern, to be honest but the problem lies with the bureaucracy, lack of accountability and overall inefficiency that proliferates within the many 'empires' that have been created within the company, by those who are generally from the sub-continent. They will be responsible for leave allocation, rostering etc and therefore will have more influence over your day to day work/life balance. Many senior management positions are held by westerners here in EK, so greedy capitalism has existed for some time but it was simply exported to the Middle East and perfected, before it was exploited closer to home. :} Never underestimate the power of a union, even if the overall effectiveness of BALPA may be a moot point for some of your colleagues. |
Originally Posted by alexcruz
(Post 10505156)
Tbh every airline is in a race to the bottom. Please someone tell me where the perfect airline is because I can tell you one thing it’s sure not our legacy carriers in the UK. If you join BA long haul your more then likely end up with 5 trips a month with just 2 days off between trips. Not really that different from EK, albeit on a lot less pay. Ok you could argue that after gaining some seniority you may be able to gain some control. But who knows? The question I ask myself is if I stay at BA and wait it out it will take me 18 years for a long haul command whose to say management wouldn’t have reduced terms and conditions even further, seems very plausible given their current record. BA management have taken away final salary pension and increased the pay scale timelines from 25 years to 35 years before you earn top salaries. Talk of moving to 24 hour layovers on routes where they can get away with it. What will they take from me in anther 10 years? Cathay used to be the airline of choice for many but now look at what management have done to that gig scale D has now been introduced as far as I’m aware hardly enough to live on in Hong Kong. To those i would say earn the money whilst you can clear your debts and then look improving your quality of life. Flying 900 hours a year till your 65 Is not sustainable and unfortunately we are now the new generation of pilots who will be tasked to do this. Choose wisely and best of luck. Too much of their, BA Management and they - don't you mean I I and I? |
I stand corrected. Right I’m opening my office door to all next week please feel free to pop in and share your views of how I should steer this ship. If your lucky I may even treat you to the Starbucks downstairs but only a grande! #watchthepennies |
How many full nights (8 to 8) does a T7 pilot spend home at DXB on an yearly aggregate, leave included? And BA?
Home many complete days, i.e. 24hrs? That metrics is not simplistic at all, allows a bit of comparison against the SH jobs, and high earners in different industries to some extent too. |
I think the carrier that offers part time might be the better one.
|
Whether or not you choose EK over BA really all depends on what you want and your own personal circumstances.
If you want the opportunity to eventually work part-time, go for BA, EK doesn't offer this, and there seems to be no desire from EK's side to make any lifestyle enhancements. Having said that, wether or not the rosters are awful depends a lot on your position within the company. At the moment the 777 guys are suffering with many more turn arounds than the A380 fleet, however, this will change with the arrival of the A330's next year. As for pay, it's expensive to establish yourself in Dubai, upon joining you'll face a lot of costs at once, however the earnings potential is very good. I am mid 30's, LHS for a few years now and receive the accommodation allowance. This means every month I get 14K Euro's, excluding flight pay and other allowances, which then drives the total compensation up to 16-17K. Make of that what you will, but for somebody mid 30's thats an extremely good salary. On top of this there is close to 2K USD going in to the provident fund every month, mine when I leave. Obviously Dubai is expensive, very expensive for certain things, but if you shop smart on layovers you can certainly cut down on your grocery bills etc. So far I've managed to acquire several properties in my home country with only a small mortgage, meaning that if I really wanted to, I could retire already and I certainly won't have to work till 65. If I re-invest my rental income I can buy another property every 5-6 years or so. Having little control over your schedule can at times be annoying, however EK offer plenty of career choices, if you decide to take up on of the opportunities offered within the company you can greatly enhance your lifestyle. Plenty of people have taken that opportunity, and now enjoy decent rosters compared to some people who only fly the line, if you put in the work you can expect the results. The race to the bottom seems to be in full gear, and with Terms & Conditions under threat within IAG, schedules becoming tight, and hotels also moving to the location EK seems to prefer, how much different will it be in the long run? Do I miss a union, transparency and sometimes simply honesty from EK? Yes, I think most of us do. But we knew what we signed up for, and to be quite honest, when I was a BALPA member I was simply shocked by their ineffectiveness, lot's of talking, very very little action. I know the individual rep's put in a lot of work, however if the judicial system restricts the union from having any real teeth, it becomes a waste of time as well. Would I join EK when I had a stable job in Europe with a family when I was in my mid 30's, probably not, knowing what I know now. Having said that, plenty of guys have done it, and plenty are still happy. Would I join again in my mid 20's, with a chance of a widebody command, the package EK offer, and the chance to set myself up for life, yes I would. People have vastly different views on EK, depending on their own personal situation. Nobody really calls Dubai home, and we are all working on an exit plan one way or another, and depending on how accustomed you become to life here, and your spending habits, it is fairly easy to put in 15 years, then re-asses the situation when you are late 30's or early 40's. It still leaves you with another 20 years of flying ahead, and if you can do that back in Europe, part-time, on a shared roster, or anything along those lines, without having to worry too much anymore about your pension etc, then maybe in terms of a career, the type of flying and life experience, it is more rewarding then spending 40 years in BA. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.