![]() |
Nothing worse than gaining command at 30-35 with the prospect of doing 4 sectors 4 or 5 days in a row for the rest of your life.
|
Do LH Bullets instead ,
I would choose command and part time in SH |
I think you would get Gatwick easily enough. 12 captains were moved for the summer from LHR because LGW were short.
The grass is not greener though. Yes three sectors not four and yes we night stop but Heathrow is like swimming against the tide at times. Even if you got command quickly you would still have taken a big pay cut from easy. |
Originally Posted by VJW
(Post 9733956)
With that in mind, having applied long haul, being a SH captain already for LoCo and having said I'd accept a SH offer from BA; how likely is it to get LGW as a base? LHR is a bit of a drive. For LH that drive would be fine 5 times a month, but for SH it'd be tougher to leave my 45 min drive LHS position I'm currently in.
|
Some of the new rule sets under EASA are not safe |
Mr. Angry - 2 man long haul ops allow for 13 hour FDP and 11 hours back of the clock on return leg. Until you actually operate a sector like this through the night, having had min rest downroute, you can't appreciate how unsafe it is. You will say show me the smoking hole then. My opinion is, sadly, it's only a matter of time.
|
2 man long haul ops allow for 13 hour FDP and 11 hours back of the clock on return leg |
At the risk of thread drift, I was replying to Mr Angrys question about Thomson working patterns. I believe LGW-PHU is a 2 man of this duration.
|
Originally Posted by Stocious
(Post 9734390)
If you bid for it, you'll likely get it fairly promptly. Not many people want to come down to LGW but there are lots of FOs at LGW who want to go up to LHR (more fool them).
I'm 3700-3900 and below a lot of guys keen for LHS at LGW. |
Originally Posted by The Mixmaster
(Post 9736605)
At the risk of thread drift, I was replying to Mr Angrys question about Thomson working patterns. I believe LGW-PHU is a 2 man of this duration.
|
recall_checked. Not since EASA FTL's were introduced.
|
Originally Posted by The Mixmaster
(Post 9736605)
At the risk of thread drift, I was replying to Mr Angrys question about Thomson working patterns. I believe LGW-PHU is a 2 man of this duration.
|
Think he means Phuket (HKT). And TOM do use 3 pilots on this route, regardless if EASA says you only need 2.
|
Mix
2 man long haul ops allow for 13 hour FDP and 11 hours back of the clock on return leg. The allowable FDP in the afternoon under EASA is more restrictive than CAP371. So it just boils down to the factorisation issue in pure FDP calcs and the fact under CAP you immediately came unacclimatised where EASA is a more practical gradual adaptation. Don't get me wrong the trip you highlighted must be pretty tough but that's the limits your sister airlines have worked to for years n years (or near to) There are plenty of postings with Thomson is the best gig in the UK so it cant all be that bad? |
My apologies I meant HKT and apologies again for thread drift!
Recall_checked, from a current 767 pilot in TOM who operates the route "LGW - HKT is rostered as a 2 man trip." Mr Angry from Purley you're telling a few fibs I'm afraid. CAP371 on return leg doesn't deal with time of day, it deals in acclimatised or unacclimatised. In an unacclimatised state (which my source tells me applies to this leg back from HKT), CAP371 certainly didn't allow 11 hours for long haul operations. CAP371 made you treat a sector over 7 hours as multi sector. For a flight the length of Thailand to U.K. You're looking at 9h45 as the 2 man limit in CAP371 compared to 11 hours under EASA. Don't let facts get in the way of a good story...nice try though :ok: And to answer your point about Thomson not being all bad. That's true but all airlines are engaged in a race to the bottom to facilitate corporate greed masquerading as "competition". So it's all relative. My buddy in Thomson did a Cape Verde recently. No overnights there any more due EASA. 5:20 out, 5:40 back. Doesnt take a genius to work out that CAP371 is far less fatiguing than the rules we operate to under our European masters. |
This thread has drifted a long way from BA DEP! :confused:
|
Yep sorry about that! To bring it back to BA, I'm delighted to hear from friends of mine on long haul there that they have sensible, BALPA negotiated FTL limits on 2 man long haul ops:ok:
|
I really do hope the long haul side of BA doesn't change to drastically in the coming years !
|
Silence
Coming full circle again and back to BA Recruitment; those of us in the hold pool are finding the silence deafening at the moment, since the last update in January.
Although the last update did explain nothing likely this year, does anyone happen to know when non FPP offers might start to be made again? Is there any semblance of a plan yet for 2018? |
Originally Posted by The Mixmaster
(Post 9741508)
.... on long haul there that they have sensible, BALPA negotiated FTL limits on 2 man long haul ops:ok:
Love_joy Last time I looked the 2018 plan for airframes etc was as before..."manpower" are about to wade through the rejigging of the existing part time pilots contracts and then will have their hands full with bids from those current full timers wanting to move onto a part time contract ..I suspect until that is done (which is going to take several months) you won't get much if anything in the way of a meaningful update....just MHO. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:21. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.