PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Flyglobespan: Time To Make A Stand (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/259984-flyglobespan-time-make-stand.html)

NG708 24th January 2007 10:11

Interesting, as in 2005, the Fleet Man issued a memo in response to rumours of such, categorically stating that this would NOT happen:bored:

Mr Angry from Purley 24th January 2007 10:22

According to the web site the MAN-CPT-MAN schedule is

MAN-CPT 1525-0400
CPT-MAN 1935-0755

Luckyguy 24th January 2007 10:36


Originally Posted by Donkey Duke (Post 3083936)
Did I get that right? The flights to CPT are out and backs or turns? I see that YYZ was like that, with one crew Dead heading in the back each way(horrible), but is that the same for CPT? How about Sanford? Also, where do you fly the Air India 767 wet lease? Which cities? And, is there a small STN base for the 737? I see there is a daily 736 to TFS, but is that it? How often do STN crews fly that? Do they go anywhere else? Cheers.

Donkey, the Cape Town flights go on the schedule above and are minimum rest downroute, operating both ways. :eek:
Toronto, a whole crew position out on Thursday and operate back on Friday evening/Saturday morning. The crew that operate out, then dead head home after a 3 hour turn at YYZ. They get off, clear customs/immigration etc and then check back in as pax. :=
Air India wet lease routes are BOM and AMD.
SFB is operating currently only once a week.
STN does indeed have a small base with a large number of pilots who do very little. Presently go only to TFS.:bored:

The icons say it all !!!

captaintrigger 24th January 2007 14:55

What A surprise!!
 
The Stansted-Larnaca has been on sale for less than 72 hours and has alredy been pulled!!

Never Mind!!

CT

763 jock 24th January 2007 16:08

Mr Angry, does that mean the aircraft sits on the ramp at CPT all day?
Cheers

Luckyguy 24th January 2007 16:43

Indeed it does, twice a week, on Sunday and Tuesday. That's a good use of the asset, eh ? 30 hours doing nothing !!

And to make matters worse, the schedule was changed to a night flight, from a daytime return flight after a 3.5 hour turn, so all the passengers had their flight times amended..... I know, because walking through the terminal, I suffered the wrath of some of them, unhappy at the whole shebang.

Anyway, it remains to be seen, what the outcome of it all will be. :ugh:

763 jock 24th January 2007 16:58

Looking at that schedule....ouch. Report at 1425Z MAN, checkout at CPT 0430Z so total duty of 14h05M. Report at 1835Z for another duty of 13H50.:mad:

Mr Angry from Purley 24th January 2007 20:03


Originally Posted by 763 jock (Post 3087315)
Looking at that schedule....ouch. Report at 1425Z MAN, checkout at CPT 0430Z so total duty of 14h05M. Report at 1835Z for another duty of 13H50.:mad:

So a 1425 report on 1 sector (with a heavy crew to negate the ETOP rule) =
13 hrs = 0325 last land. Therefore they need 1hr 05 mins extension by presumably in flight relief?.
However on the return (acclimatised as only 2 hrs different in CPT) the max FDP is 12.00 hrs so 1835z + 12.00 = 0635 last land so a 1hr 20 min in flight relief required. So I guess the question would be is the seat provided acceptable and screened from the punters?.
I would also point out the rest period is noted to be min rest, not really its a lot more, and falls into a much better rest period than a 18-30 hr rest period, which in the eyes of the CAA, the sleep experts and many many Pilots is to be avoided. Clearly if the aircraft is not needed in MAN why bring it straight back, this is nothing new look at other L/H Airlines!. :\

Stan Woolley 24th January 2007 20:53

Mr Angry from Purley

Spoken like someone who knows all about the theory and nothing about the practise. You really haven't a clue have you?

weiss5 25th January 2007 19:31

SHAME
 
How can we improve conditions at GSM when Pilots take the aircraft to cpt WITHOUT sufficient crew rest seating:ugh: The last flight to cpt the crew went with econ seats as rest:mad: for FD and NO seat rest area for CC.
SHAME SHAME SHAME:confused:

cunningplanmylord 25th January 2007 19:34

Surely someone must ASR this, or at the very least flight report it.
CAA would be interested to hear this im sure.

Mr Angry from Purley 25th January 2007 20:14


Originally Posted by Stan Woolley (Post 3087720)
Mr Angry from Purley
Spoken like someone who knows all about the theory and nothing about the practise. You really haven't a clue have you?

Stan i'm not saying its right just pointing a few facts.

In theory and practice , crew will only get one chance at a sleep be it 11 or 14 hrs rest. 18-30 rest periods check Chirp.
If there is no screened seat then something is amiss, call CAA Flight Ops Policy on 01293 567171 ask ask for the chap with the same surname as Gordon at 11 Downing Street. Maybe there is a variation en force unlikely I think :\

Stan Woolley 25th January 2007 21:40

Fair enough Mr A.

All I know from looking at that trip is that I would be totally knackered by the time I landed back in the UK, particularly without a proper rest area. The fact is you will be trying to sleep through the day with the associated light/noise/ interruptions between two very long night duties and I at least always found that difficult to do.

BTW I've never seen a UK 767 with a proper crew rest area.

Banzai Eagle 26th January 2007 18:47


Originally Posted by weiss5 (Post 3089674)
How can we improve conditions at GSM when Pilots take the aircraft to cpt WITHOUT sufficient crew rest seating:ugh: The last flight to cpt the crew went with econ seats as rest:mad: for FD and NO seat rest area for CC.
SHAME SHAME SHAME:confused:

I'll mention this to as CAA inspecting officer for you i know weiss5

Mr Moustache 28th January 2007 16:16


Originally Posted by weiss5 (Post 3089674)
How can we improve conditions at GSM when Pilots take the aircraft to cpt WITHOUT sufficient crew rest seating:ugh: The last flight to cpt the crew went with econ seats as rest:mad: for FD and NO seat rest area for CC.
SHAME SHAME SHAME:confused:

Funny, sounds a bit like the B737 Hurghada flights of the summer of 2005 (our first attempt at long haul!). No proper in-flight rest facilities etc. I thought the company realised how much unhappiness this caused and were not going to try it on again. Perhaps everything was fogotten over the intervening year or so. :rolleyes:

weiss5 29th January 2007 15:52

gone x 3
 
Management sill no closer to having eye on the ball.... 3 more pilots resign:ugh: seems like they are still seeing the trees and not the forest:hmm:

Barnaby Rudge 29th January 2007 20:27

weiss5,seems to me from your posts that English is not your first language so did you came here for a contract,were you told lies at your interview,if so leave and claim compensation from your employer,if not either stay or leave,your views are not those of people I fly with on the 737 so don't assume to speak for everybody.
PocaHostie,you won't be poking me f#tboyslim,heres hopeing the Ryanair assessment works out for you as Korean obviously didnt want you.
BongoBill,pity you didnt include cabin crew,but a lot of the flightdeck at Glasgow and Edinburgh didn't even reply to you and asked why didnt you do your survey in the open?

NG708 29th January 2007 21:59

Barnaby Rudge,

BongoBill,pity you didnt include cabin crew
Why should he when they have a perfectly good union of their own?
You don't say what you do, but from your profile, I presume you are cabin crew. In which case why not get in touch with your union and make some changes rather than slate others for trying to.:yuk:

weiss5 30th January 2007 13:35

fool
 
hey Barnaby,

English may not be my first language! What has that to do with anything? Seems like you have little command of the english language! Clearly you cannot understand what i have wrote. I am not 73 you fool:mad: so P****** back into your little whole.

Barnaby Rudge 30th January 2007 19:10

What a nice foreign gentleman you seem to be weiss5,I'm so glad you are not on my airplane,just stay where you are or leave but dont lump all globespan crew in with your problems.
And the word is hole not whole you silly man.

On-MarkBob 30th January 2007 19:14

First of all, weiss5, many of us would be proud to have a second language spoken and written as well as you obviously can. You have reason to be proud. Don't rise to the derogatory comments of others. We are supposed to be professional people and this kind of comment and backbiting is not required in this thread. Is it not surprising that it is so difficult to organise proper representation when you cannot seem to join as a coherent and popular front?

Might I suggest that we keep to the subject and useful input.

Jetdriver 30th January 2007 20:53

My thin ice alert is flashing , and I see one or two people skating out there. :=

Dash-7 lover 30th January 2007 21:17

BONGO BILL


SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED A SCHEDULING AGREEMENT SIMILAR TO THE ONE AT BA CONNECT - and look what's happening there!

Barnaby Rudge 31st January 2007 09:45

weiss5 I apologise that you take offence. You joined as a non english pilot, if you dont like things here you can leave but pilots in globespan arent all up in arms. Like us they dont like 4 sectors and positioning in taxis,maybe different where you are but here were happy.
pocahostie how paranoid are you? wing commander g is the manager, now me ? If Ive not made any posts maybe nothing interested me, this thread interests me because it relates to people I work with,including you. Everytime you come into the crew room we shudder, hows that for CRM.:*

haggis hurler 12th February 2007 12:07

Great news everyone
 
"fgs are presently considering an RPI increase in salaries"

The futures bright, the futures Orange!

Climbforever 14th February 2007 10:36

GSM has informed that they are welcoming an internally selected pilot commitee.
Bongo Bill, any info about how many joins to BALPA?

Banzai Eagle 14th February 2007 17:09

haggis, how much of a payrise are ezy getting then?

beenarround 15th February 2007 16:21

'The Evil Empire'
 
I have been waiting and hoping for some recognition from the 4th floor that the only experienced long haul manager they have has something to offer.I have been disapointed. He is sent off to far flung places in order that they can perform their evil deeds without hindrance. He was not consulted prior to the introduction of the CPT min rest. Despite his representation to the hierarchy after he experienced the ordeal first hand it continues. The commercial dept runs this airline without any constraint from the Flt Ops Dept
The union recognition thing is vital, but will take time.Congratulations on the progress so far.The T&G are indeed very powerful, but will not be interested in representing the pilot body if previous experience is anything to go by.From the numbers published BALPA is the obvious choice despite my personal abhorance for the organisation.
In the short term a withdrawl of good will might achieve some results.Unfortunately I think that there are still enough people who will do anything rendering that course of action less than ideal. Having said that, a refusal to undertake unreasonably long duties does not seem to meet with any hassle.If all of you who feel strongly enough say 'NO' to climbing in the back they will run out of 'yes men'. At the same time a crossing of the T's and dotting of the I's with a very blunt pencil on the CPT planning will definately hurt.What is the hotel in PMI?
Chirp is an extremely powerful organ and it really gets their attention when the ministry comes to call. The time scale is frighteningly fast when 'flight safety' is mentioned. In the min rest CPT this is clearly an issue.
At the same, time an ASR sent directly to the CAA seems to have the same effect. We no longer have a Flight Safety Officer as I understand it so the only way to retain annonymity is to go direct.
There are issues with escape routes over Tehran and Diverion fields in Africa which are just being swept under the carpet.
No one wants to harm the company's long term viability. Every time we go to work we are expected to perjure ourselves by signing a voyage report showing fictitious rest in a non existant crew rest area. If this is the only way the company can afford do the job is there any long term viability? With NG joining the India contract and the introduction of assorted leased AC and crews are they just running 'a virtual airline?
Finally, it doesn't do what it said on the tin shown to me not so long ago and that is very sad.It looks like the company is finally running out of the 6's it has been throwing since it started the long haul ops.Lets hope it doesn't come down to earth with too much of a bump!!

Monarch Man 15th February 2007 16:29

CHIRP continues to be an effective tool at MON to bring the authorities focus to bear on questionable rostering endeavors.
I would suggest that you GSM boys and girls use this system as it was designed for this very reason.

beenarround 15th February 2007 16:54

asset use
 
Dont forget the down time in SFB is over 24 hrs, and that was happening twice a week.Alltogether over three days down time per week. What does it cost to lease one of these beasts? The crews all do bullets and the hotac and allowances are less so thats all right then!!

haggis hurler 16th February 2007 14:42

Disappointed but not surprised by the less than proactive response from BALPA, I have been a member for many years and paid my subs. What are they doing?

haggis hurler 16th February 2007 19:26

No, I wasn't, what happened? Do tell.

greenscreens 17th February 2007 17:53

Struggle to employ?
 
Are Globespan struggling to employ? I bet they will now after this thread is read. I was contemplating joining as a direct entry captain.

......dont think I will bother now.

Good luck guys.

Luckyguy 19th February 2007 10:13

Oops
 
That's interesting. What were the circumstances behind it, do you know ?

LeadingEdge 19th February 2007 11:26

...and other problems...
 

Are Globespan struggling to employ? I bet they will now after this thread is read. I was contemplating joining as a direct entry captain.

......dont think I will bother now.

Good luck guys.
Good decision you made. But in case you join, have everything in written what they promise you. At the same time, you will find out that communication is very poor between operations and flight crews. Always follow up on emails you send, as you might just simply not get an answer. The same goes with documents you send via email. I sent them my Disclosure Scotland form twice, and they told me a few weeks ago, that they never received it. After resending it, the same thing happened again.

The same goes with expenses. I sent in mine (via snail mail),and they rejected it, but "forgot" to tell me.

Overall, they need to work hard to improve their communication efforts, as it seems to be a one way road right now.

cheers

LE

haggis hurler 19th February 2007 14:53

"gsm flightdeck delayed the gsm711 10th feb causing an over night stay at man for the pax"

How were BALPA involved? What did they do?

Its nearly 3 weeks since the vote for recognition, has anyone heard from BALPA?

Walter D. Ned 16th March 2007 16:52

Afternoon all. Just delivered the wife to her wrestling class (advanced) and found myself confined to barracks so decided to look up prune for old time sake and lo and behold what do I find myself reading but reams and reams on this outfit which is now calling itself "Globespan" and it occurred to me that perhaps some of you now working for it or, worse still, some of you who might be thinking of "giving" your very hard earned or yet to be earned money for "training" to this or indeed to any outfit which has similar attitudes and abilities to this one and might not be aware of its recent history. So, set out hereunder are a few "pointers" which may or may not give you some insight into the "professionalism" of "Da Management" of the company which you are or may in the future have to deal with.

When myself and my colleagues worked for this outfit they called themselves Cougar Leasing Limited and were based at Stansted. Approximately two years after "Da Management" eventually managed to get the outfit up and running, the flight crews were informed by the head of flight operations that the company had "gone" and given the somewhat "erratic" management style not to mention the "abilities" of those who had become known, non too affectionately, as the "Cougar Cowboys", many of us employees were less than surprised that events had turned out as we had been informed they had by "Da Management". However, what we failed to comprehend was that when the head of flight operations told us that the company had "gone", that is exactly what he meant! The company had simply shut up shop in Stansted and "gone" up the road to Scotland where, with the benefit of a swift name change, they "morphed" themselves from Cougar into Globespan and opened up as "Scotland’s favourite airline"??!!!

Now, naturally, like any family moving house in "a bit of a hurry" a few "items" went "missing" and in the case of Cougar/Globespan it turned out to be the employees! Particularly, the flight crews who were "unfortunately mislaid" in the move along with their jobs, salaries, allowances and expenses, not to mention hopes and desires and of course the "trifling" matter of the thousands of pounds involved in the cost of a type rating and additional expenses incurred in gaining it and no salary for months on end for those who were "obliged" to pay for their rating!

However, dear reader, I'm delighted to tell you that the move wasn’t all bad news as "Da Management" to an individual and complete with their salaries, expenses and "management perks" managed to safely negotiate the perils of the A1 and arrived in Scotland without losing a single solitary manager in the process, which for this lot let me tell you, was quite a feat and "achieved", quite possibly, because for the first time in their lives they knew exactly what they were up to! Of course, once safely ensconced in Edinburgh it seemed "obvious" to "Da Management" that their hard working and much put upon flight crews "probably" would not really want their livelihoods back or their jobs back or their salaries or their expenses and it would be "easier" all round if "Da Management" simply went out and got a "bunch" of "new" pilots who would "naturally" have to pay for their own type ratings rather than the company having to go to all the "bother" of paying to type rate their existing pilots onto a new aircraft type and that is exactly what they did!! Of course the "exceptional" and "highly qualified" not to mention most secretive management pilots and their three pals were not subject either to the loss of their livelihoods or the pittance involved in type rating them onto the new aircraft type which was paid for by "Da Management". After all, the company "owed" these "individualists" much for the part they had played in this rather shabby little whizz. If ever there was a company and a job where that old adage of "you shouldn’t have joined if you can’t take a joke" rang true, this is the one.

So my two pennies worth for those who might be thinking of spending substantial sums of their own, or worse still, their bank manager’s money with this or any company with similar type attitudes to this one is to consider your every move very, very carefully indeed as it is utterly unrealistic to expect that any company which is unwilling or unable to spend money on training employees to do their jobs will adopt a more conscientious attitude toward any other aspect of your employ which, put very simply, means that you and yours will be the losers and that loss may well be total, everything, jobs, salaries the lot, as your colleagues who went before you have had to endure.

Should you however happen to be a Captain "downsizing" from a large professional airline and looking for something a little "edgy" to do as you don’t play golf but fancy the idea of seeing how the "other half" live or should you be loaded and don’t mind wasting a few tens of thousands of pounds and a couple of years of your life not to mention be treated like a total moron, then my friend, you may have found your spiritual home either with this outfit or indeed with any of its low cost, low standards, allies. So, if it’s for you, please go right ahead, fill your boots, enjoy yourself and jolly good luck to you. If, on the other hand, you have a mortgage to pay, a family to feed and regard yourself to be a professional airline pilot and are looking to enhance your career prospects, then my friend, there is, in my opinion, absolutely nothing of interest for you here. Rather as "bantermanter" says "keep your money and buy yourself a flash car" or you might like to consider taking yourself and the money that you were going to "give" to this outfit for a type rating to the races at Cheltenham, find yourself an outsider, something with three legs, a cough, an attitude problem and who is double jobbing with a milk round and put your last penny on it! If it does come in, you're rich and you won’t ever need to consider such a risky venture as a career in flying. If it fails are you any the worse off? At least, you’ll be able to say you’ve enjoyed yourself which most certainly will not be the case if you "give" your money to this type of operation in the hope of obtaining through hard work and effort, long term job prospects! If you want a career in flying, join a company which "simply" bonds you. That way you'll have nothing to beat yourself up over if you should find that, through absolutely no fault of either yours or your colleagues but rather due to what might be called an "avant-garde" management "style" the entire edifice comes down around your ears. Then at least, you can console yourself with the thought that "all" will suffer the pain and loss equally!!!

Some contributors have written about this outfit’s "terms & conditions" and while I sincerely hope that they are somewhat different to those endured at Cougar, it would seem more likely however that as a Cougar never changes its spots when push comes to shove (and believe me it will!) and with the behaviour this outfit and its management saying far more and showing in the clearest possible terms how they "value" their employees than could ever be written here, the employees will find that the modus operandi of globespan is, like all aspects of this company, identical to those employed when they called themselves Cougar, which, put bluntly, means that T's & C's are something of a moveable feast as far as the "unconnected" PAYE employees are concerned. In one article, a contributor writes of receiving "no pay rise". With respect, I would suggest that if you can hold on to your original salary you’ll be doing bloody well!! As Cougar Leasing Limited, some aircrew who joined having paid for their own type rating, accommodation and all expenses while training and of course no salary until, for whatever reason the Flight Operations Manager thought of came to pass, the end of training, the end of line training, the end of the world?!! The reasoning tended to be, how can one put it... "fairly nebulous", found that within a few weeks of going "on salary" the flight operations manager decided that "at least" two First Officers would have their salaries cut in half, regretfully, this "plan" couldn’t be "implemented" as the Cougar Cowboys were always short crewed!! (can you guess why??) but that never stopped the Flight Operations Manager scuttling around as a Caudal. At various stages during the "Cougar success story" individual flight crew members had their salaries "adjusted"by "Da Management" in order that as PAYE workers they could "help out the company"! Needless to say "Da Management" never saw the same necessity for any adjustment to their own salaries or indeed any other aspect of their farcical and diabolical behaviour.

So, what are the chances of Globespan succeeding? I would most respectfully suggest that they are exactly the same as those of Excalibur? Or Gill Air? Or Cougar or any of the other assorted riff-raff outfits that "Da Management" have already "managed", straight into the nearest ditch!

One final point... do not rely on the Authority, the Legislator or the British Airways Pilots Association coming to your aid. When this company was called Cougar and it decided to "emigrate" up the road to Scotland, it was not "hampered" in the slightest by rules or legislation.

Run far and run fast my friend. Chalk it up to experience. You will not make the same mistake again!

Humans have the dexterity to think and consider and to put a value on themselves and their efforts. What a shame to waste such abilities.

weiss5 18th March 2007 19:05

sad sad sad
 
TomCat111 no need to pick any brains. this airline is the worst airline i have worked for. i will soon leave when my next job starts (may..if i can wait that long):mad: I have tried to put up and hope all would change. I give up! so many things are wrong here and nobody seems to care:ugh: the yes men are slowly winning:D i am only talking of 767 operation but i am sure the 737 would be the same.

Lots of jobs about look elseware.. because we all are. going to work now is a sad event:mad: :mad: :mad:

CAT1 REVERSION 20th March 2007 09:19

Walter D.Ned,

Made for good reading, VERY interesting stuff, certainly made me think twice about submitting a CV.

Just wish the pilot fraternity would get a backbone and say "NO" to all these airlines which are now DEMANDING you have to pay for your type rating-If there were to be some kind of pilot revolt, the airlines would be forced to pay for training as in the past...

Most of us would be happy to be bonded, which in its self is a form of paying, but all these schemes at the moment are all aimed at getting as much money out of you as poossible-Someone somewhere is getting rich on the back of it, including the training organisations!

JUST SAY NO!!!!! (Wasn't that Zammo Maguire in Grange Hill back in the 80's?)

weiss5 20th March 2007 14:01

roster!!!
 
anyone know the legal requirment for issue of roster!! again no roster = no plan for next month = family problems again. why can this company get away mit this:}


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:04.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.