PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Air Atlanta upgrades (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/146451-air-atlanta-upgrades.html)

isaacstraw 28th September 2004 13:03

Air Atlanta upgrades
 
Anyone get the call for an upgrade course on the 742 in October yet?

Maybe Jerry O'S can give us an update.:}

Howlowcanugo 30th September 2004 19:46

Upgrade Really,
To violate 3 to 6 rules to move an airplane, only then to call ones self proffesional.
Make us all laugh again.
Estatic to be allowed now to work for an Airline that lies and deciet are frowned upon.

Loc-out 1st October 2004 08:02

The promises of upgrades, are there to retain the faithful.

That's what our outfit does to boost moral.

Formally Known As 3rd October 2004 08:25

Isaac

Maybe the course has been cancelled.

They can still find DEC's I guess.

bafanguy 3rd October 2004 21:38

Air Atlanta
 
On www.climbto350.com ( a pay site ), I see that on Oct. 3rd, Air Atlanta advertised for 747-200 crews ( all seats ) with interviews in MIA on Oct. 23/24. The job posting didn't even require previous 747 time. They were asking for DEC's.

Why would they take people off the street rather than upgrade their existing FO's. It would seem to be cheaper to upgrade an existing FO than train a guy off the street with no 747 time.

What do you know about this company ?

747CLASSIC 4th October 2004 00:43

What do I know about this company?

They pay some of the lowest wages in the industry for cockpit crews.
They pay their mechanics better wages than flight crew.
No per diem.
Very little time off. They used to work the cockpit crew for three months then eight days off at home. I would guess this to still be the case.
Forget about upgrades unless you are a "cod-head".
Zero benefits.
If a Flight Attendant does well they put them in a management position. Have you ever heard of a company that is run by Flight Attendants?
Don't think about it unless McDonald's won't give you an application!
Been there, done that, got the shirt-never again!

classic

icemanalgeria 4th October 2004 04:01

I feel for the guys waiting for their command upgrades, I have flown with most of them and can say they are in the right seat only because they are still waiting for the course.

However I do not agree with all that has been said here.

I believe and these are only my thoughts that the company planned for upgrade courses last year (and Jerry past this news onto the guys waiting).

But Air Atlanta´s requirement changes rapidly and so does their ability to offer command upgrades.

This summer was impossible because of the amount of pilots that had to be trained.

since the 767´s joined Air Atlanta they upgraded around 16 first officers, and would have upgraded more this summer if they had the resources to do so.

Out of those 16 only 1 was Icelandic.

I say again, I feel for the guys waiting, the AAI market has changed and your turn has been put back again, But AAI is expanding a great deal and the future looks very good for you.

Maybe next year will be your year, I hope so

Formally Known As 4th October 2004 07:52

If you are Norwegian and flown for their national airline, 737 or another medium weight jet, you will be trained on the 747 and straight in the LHS.

Some of the most appalling examples of nepotism I have ever seen were in AAI. As I found this and the lies coming out of Iceland and the UK unacceptable I did the decent thing and left. Fortunately I could afford to.

The CP AAI, well words fail me.

matkat 4th October 2004 09:12

Dear 747 classic,I feel i must respond to your statement that AAI pay their mechanics more than flight crews,this is factualy incorrect.There is not 1 mechanic that earns more than any cockpit crew,I think you maybe refering to "Certifying Staff" the CRS personnel at AAI make a basic wage comparible to a Captain however a CRS contract is based on a basic Month of 200 hours and any overtime payments are only made after that.I was making a basic salary of $5850 per month working 10 days 10 night and 10 off when we changed from days to nights we worked a day shift then a night shift,the 10 days off included 2 days travelling time.These salaries for certifying staff(not mechanics)are below industry average and have not been increased for over 10 years,also please bear in mind that salaries are by and large governed by the law of supply and demand and at the present time there is a worldwide shortage of qualified(Read:certifying staff)technicians.I know personaly of several certifying technicians who only stay there for the 10 days off.By the way I no longer work for AAI(left Madrid July 2001)If any of You know me please drop Me a PM.
Best regards
matkat

isaacstraw 4th October 2004 11:23

I guess the answer to my question is nobody.

GlueBall 4th October 2004 15:01

The sudden hiring frenzy could conceivably be a spool-up for the Hadj beginning in December, or it could reflect some obvious desperation by the carrier in attracting and keeping experienced crews at relatively low industry pay. Needless to say, there is never any shortage of experienced and qualified crews when commensurate compensation is proffered.
:{ :{ :{

Howlowcanugo 4th October 2004 17:56

Well lets see matkat.
Last I recall a F/O made 173 per day.
That times 30 comes to 5,190.
Less than your figure of 5,850.
You also get 10 days off at home a month with the same pay, poor old F/O gets this subtracted from his pay of 5,190.
So if for say he takes 10 days off a month such as you then his salary gets reduced by 1,730.
Making his bring home a month 3,460.
Most F/O only go home every 3 months otherwise they cannot afford it.
Do you understand this or should we break it down more for you.

747CLASSIC 4th October 2004 19:12

I have to agree with Howlow... When I "did time" in MAD w/AAI one of the mechanics told me he was making $6,000+/mo. working 20 days/mo. then getting 10 days off each month at home. That sounds one hell of a lot better than the $5500/mo. that I was paid and then the 8 days at home every 3 months!

And for the Iceman, (Should it not be Icelandicman?) if the 1 in 16 statement you made is true then AAI must of upgraded all the cod-head F/O's (you know the ones, they went from 1000 hours in a C150 to the right seat of a heavy) sometime in the pervious 4 year sense I left AAI.
By not addressing the other charges that I made about AAI you must agree with me.

classic

Earl 4th October 2004 19:46

I have to agree with Howlo and 747 classic, this was the pay scale when I resigned as of Jan this year.
My pay was slightly higher as I worked there for 6 years.
Even then I had to fight for pay increases according to my contract.
Had to fight for this and even after getting the increase no explanation was given as to why this was withheld. (18 months)
Even after I ask for it in writing.
A nice I made a mistake would have been nice.

icemanalgeria 5th October 2004 18:34

747classic, Just to answer your question, I am not Icelandic.

The reason I only responded to one of your points is becuase this was the only item which was on the topic of upgrades.

I can only speak about the 767 fleet, and I say again 16 upgrades in 4 years and only one of them was Icelandic.

Anyone on the 767 know of any more than the 1 I mention?

I'm sure the other points you mention are those you experienced but on the 767 fleet things were a little different,

One example was the fo's started on $200 per day and capts on $250 per day, ($6000pm, $7500).

The pay for those guys now are $230 per day for the fo and $280 for the captain ($6900 pm ,$8400).

matkat 6th October 2004 00:16

Gentlemen,let Me break it down a little further on the 21 days we worked (remember we worked 2 days on one shift)we never had any days of we had 2 days travelling time on the days off therefore we had 8 days off we were routinely expected to work 12 hours per day for the compete rota,however you guys were having days off in between flights.I do contend that our shift pattern was better arranged than Yours however whos fault is that?Please read My post carefully I said no MECHANICS were paid more than cockpit crew as I previously said CERTIFYING STAFF salaries were roughly equivalent to a Captains,by definition a MECHANIC is not CERTIFYING STAFF They are the people who certify Your A/C as fit for flight that is the reason why the salaries are higher.Personally I think all of AAI staff are underpaid and having been privey to an AAI contract some years back(In Tunis)I know they can certainly afford it.Please do not get all upset by what I say because I am for sure in agreement with You its just when You post remarks that AAI pay their MECHANICS more than flight crew it is incorrect by definition,If I rember mechanics were paid from $3000-$4800 but to be at the upper scale they had to have been with AAI for some considerable time or had a head like a certain sea creature.

matkat

747CLASSIC 6th October 2004 01:23

matkat,

I certainly am in agreement when you say that, "all of AAI staff are underpaid" and you being privey to a contract, "they certainly can afford it"(pay better).
BUT, in your first post you state that you were paid $5850 and 10 days at home per month (now you say you were only paid $3000 - $4800 for 21 days of work. Which is correct?) while I was paid $5500 per month with 8 days at home every three months. It still looks to me like the mechanics got a better deal! What am I missing here?

classic

matkat 7th October 2004 09:36

Gentlemen,there seems to be a bit of confusion here,when with AAI I was certifying staff,mechanics are not certifying staff and are consequently on the lower rate mentioned.I did not say I was on the lower rate and please bear in mind the figures I mentioned for MECHANICS must be treated as approx as it was 3 years ago when I was in Madrid and are as best as I can remember.Personally I was paid $5850,the total breakdown for certifying Staff is as follows,My salary level was based on being with AAI for 2 years if My memory serves me correctly it would go up every year(By $50 per month,I think) to a maximum of 10 years.Extras were shift leader +10% of basic salary.Overtime was paid at $20 per hour either after working 12 hours in any shift or accumulating more than 200 hours in your rotation,both were often exceeded,Lead Technician was paid 20% of basic i.e. Mohammed in MAD.Flying pay was paid at $10 per hour.
hope this clears up any confusion and My apologies for same.As for the 8 days at home I did conceed that our shift patterns were better than Yours when I first worked for AAI in 1995 we had the same pattern as You but negotiated a different one and really that is what You all should do, but believe me working line maintenance for 10&half days and 10&half nights you are on deaths door
matkat

Earl 7th October 2004 20:26

ground engineers with AAI work their ass off.
No way would I ever want their job.
Just like the pilots they are underpaid and overworked and expected to perform beyond the normal requirements, yet the company does not appreciate that.
I remember after 911 when we went under a new contract which was much less to help the company.
We were promised an even better contract after the company turned around.
What was offered was even less than our original contract.
AAI was making more money than ever at this point.
I pretty much made the decision to resign after that and went back to my previous airline.
AAI has a lot of problems and need to realize that the pilots and ground engineers are the most contributing factor to the companies survival.
Have many friends still working there and wish all the best.

747CLASSIC 8th October 2004 01:31

You guys that are still at AAI should form a UNION! The "cod-heads" did and they got a better deal. With the hajj coming up, it couldn't be a better time with AAI desperately trying to recruit crews at the meger wages and no benies!

classic


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.