PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Jet2 Hold Pool (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/626986-jet2-hold-pool.html)

BaronVonBarnstormer 10th Mar 2024 08:54

Summer roster
 
I've been hearing that summers can be pretty brutal at Jet2; rolling 5 or 6 days on with 2 off. Lots of 4am landing back in base and little in the way of stability or roster protection. Can anyone confirm or deny? Specifically for the Airbus fleet but I understand the ramp up in deliveries probably won't have produced a "full" summer yet. Again this is what I've been told and I've been in the industry long enough to know that perception and reality are not always the same thing. A PM with a RHS roster would also be great if anyone is willing.

Mr Good Cat 10th Mar 2024 09:39


Originally Posted by BaronVonBarnstormer (Post 11612543)
I've been hearing that summers can be pretty brutal at Jet2; rolling 5 or 6 days on with 2 off. Lots of 4am landing back in base and little in the way of stability or roster protection. Can anyone confirm or deny? Specifically for the Airbus fleet but I understand the ramp up in deliveries probably won't have produced a "full" summer yet. Again this is what I've been told and I've been in the industry long enough to know that perception and reality are not always the same thing. A PM with a RHS roster would also be great if anyone is willing.

You won't get a representative RHS roster as there aren't enough Airbus in the fleet yet and it's overcrewed pending deliveries. From a 737 perspective, summers are busy in both seats. It's definitely not a 'rolling' 5 or 6 on with 2 off, you might have a '5 - 2' in a month but then it would be followed by something random like 3 on 3 off then 4 on 2 off. There's no predictability in that sense. You will get very late landings at the bigger bases such as MAN / STN, as the second wave is scheduled 2-3am but always at least an hour or so late. However, a 4am landing will get you a duty rest period the day after. Yes, summer is disruptive (June to September anyway) but outside of this things are fairly stable, but this is the holiday market in the UK. Winter will be quiet apart from an upsurge in December.

If you like your fixed pattern then LowCost airlines are the way to go. If you prefer the happy upbeat atmosphere of a holiday company with busy summers and quiet winters then Jet2 or TUI will suit you better. But you WILL work hard for it in the peak months.

Basicsteve 10th Mar 2024 11:54

The remuneration the pilots get for hours worked (5-600hrs) is pretty spectacular. I assume it’s within Jet2s interest to get more winter work in ? For example Cape Verde ? Or if you believe the rumours LH

marcus1290 10th Mar 2024 19:34


Originally Posted by Basicsteve (Post 11612628)
The remuneration the pilots get for hours worked (5-600hrs) is pretty spectacular. I assume it’s within Jet2s interest to get more winter work in ? For example Cape Verde ? Or if you believe the rumours LH

LH isn't happening anytime soon. Not in the next 5-10 years anyway.

Jonty 10th Mar 2024 19:42


Originally Posted by marcus1290 (Post 11612829)
LH isn't happening anytime soon. Not in the next 5-10 years anyway.

I used to think that. Now I’m not so sure.

Basicsteve 10th Mar 2024 19:55


Originally Posted by Jonty (Post 11612832)
I used to think that. Now I’m not so sure.


how so ?

Prob30Tempo TSRA 10th Mar 2024 22:30


Originally Posted by Basicsteve (Post 11612628)
The remuneration the pilots get for hours worked (5-600hrs) is pretty spectacular. I assume it’s within Jet2s interest to get more winter work in ? For example Cape Verde ? Or if you believe the rumours LH


LH would be a good way to successfully ruin the airline - I’m sure the management are bright enough to look at premiair, Norwegian , WOW etc and realise long haul with low cost is almost impossible to do and make money but it’s a good and routine rumour to introduce every now and then .

Unless we are talking about the “ Tango “ routes to Tenerife ??

Basicsteve 11th Mar 2024 06:02


Originally Posted by Prob30Tempo TSRA (Post 11612902)
LH would be a good way to successfully ruin the airline - I’m sure the management are bright enough to look at premiair, Norwegian , WOW etc and realise long haul with low cost is almost impossible to do and make money but it’s a good and routine rumour to introduce every now and then .

Unless we are talking about the “ Tango “ routes to Tenerife ??


yes but it wouldn’t really be like those airlines quoted , it would be like TUI LH which is a good product I think

737 Jockey 11th Mar 2024 07:28

You make a fair point. But it’s comparing Apples and Oranges really. Low cost flight only versus holiday package tours. It would be a risk to part from the known, but that’s business sometimes. As far as Cape Verde is concerned, I’d heard a rumour that TUI had basically threatened to pull out from the island completely if any of the resorts even showed a bit of ankle towards J2 or any other operator…

At the end of the day, you have to play to your strengths, and maybe LH wouldn’t be appropriate considering the J2 customer demographic.

Mr Good Cat 11th Mar 2024 08:01

Jet2 still haven't conquered the Mediterranean yet. There are some parts of Greece and a lot of North Africa that are yet to be exploited, and within the current fleet capabilities. It's just a case of being able to get enough quality hotels to to guarantee the product. I'm sure if there is money to be made on Orlando and Mexico it will happen in the future, but I don't see that happening before Egypt, Tunisia and the remaining Greek islands not yet served. The Med is a guaranteed earner whatever happens to the economy, so it would be an uncharacteristic risk by Jet2 to suddenly invest a lot of money on a riskier strategy.

Prob30Tempo TSRA 11th Mar 2024 09:42

Yes , that makes sense .

Didn't they used to lease an 330 off Air tanker ? Surely easiest way to go on the seasonal Orlando etc …rather than get their own .


But airlines need rumours , because rumours provide hope for the future . 757 rumour was always “ we are getting 767s “.

Mr Good Cat 11th Mar 2024 11:14


Originally Posted by Prob30Tempo TSRA (Post 11613134)
Yes , that makes sense .

Didn't they used to lease an 330 off Air tanker ? Surely easiest way to go on the seasonal Orlando etc …rather than get their own .


But airlines need rumours , because rumours provide hope for the future . 757 rumour was always “ we are getting 767s “.

There are always A330 leases. At the moment there is one for the winter and two for the summer (was 3 last year). If Jet2 get their own A330s you will see them flying short-haul from MAN before any long-haul venture, just because there is limited capacity at MAN and even in the winter there are several flights a day to certain destinations, which could easily be covered by one full A330. The fact it's on the same rating as the A321 means it's flexible with crew too. The only issue is the engine cycles and the fuel burn required to get it to cruising altitude. These would be outweighed by a full load each time though.

double-oscar 11th Mar 2024 12:48

[QUOTE=737 Jockey;11613050]You make a fair point. But it’s comparing Apples and Oranges really. Low cost flight only versus holiday package tours. It would be a risk to part from the known, but that’s business sometimes. As far as Cape Verde is concerned, I’d heard a rumour that TUI had basically threatened to pull out from the island completely if any of the resorts even showed a bit of ankle towards J2 or any other operator…

As TUI have invested heavily and own or have joint ventures with many of the other hotel owners I don’t think pulling out is an option. Whether Jet2 could find enough hotels to work with is probably more likely the problem.

dhc1180 11th Mar 2024 21:17


Originally Posted by Mr Good Cat (Post 11613213)
There are always A330 leases. At the moment there is one for the winter and two for the summer (was 3 last year). If Jet2 get their own A330s you will see them flying short-haul from MAN before any long-haul venture, just because there is limited capacity at MAN and even in the winter there are several flights a day to certain destinations, which could easily be covered by one full A330. The fact it's on the same rating as the A321 means it's flexible with crew too. The only issue is the engine cycles and the fuel burn required to get it to cruising altitude. These would be outweighed by a full load each time though.

the 330 is a separate rating to the 320 family

Mr Good Cat 11th Mar 2024 21:35


Originally Posted by dhc1180 (Post 11613566)
the 330 is a separate rating to the 320 family


It's just a CCQ course. Provided by Airbus as part of any purchase and not a huge training commitment. Probably not worth having all the crew trained on both, but certainly some of the experienced crew trained on mixed-fleet flying. Trainers for example.

I can see it happening sooner rather than later.

zeteo 15th Mar 2024 20:17

Hello All,



Has anyone received a start date recently for NTR FO position. I completed my assessment in January and received a call confirming that I met the benchmark and would be contacted in due course, after which I was placed in the holding pool. However, I recently received a generic email requesting my base preference and notice period. Additionally, upon checking the portal, I noticed that my application, which had progressed to the interview stage, is now listed as "under review," indicating a regression in the process.



I'm curious about the typical wait time before receiving a start date. Any insights would be greatly appreciated.



Thank you in advance.

AirbusP1 16th Mar 2024 13:13

It can vary for a number of different reasons, e.g. rated or non rated, base preference, your notice period, pilots declining agreed course dates at late notice etc etc. There is no 'typical' wait time in the hold pool. If you're non rated you are going to require a longer course and require more line training sectors than a rated pilot. If training capacity is an issue it might increase your wait time in the hold pool, it might not, depending on what the company's requirement is. Good luck. (I waited nearly a year for an interview then 2 months for the offer as a rated Airbus Captain. Others had offers immediately possibly due to base preference and notice period).

zeteo 16th Mar 2024 20:30


Originally Posted by AirbusP1 (Post 11617123)
It can vary for a number of different reasons, e.g. rated or non rated, base preference, your notice period, pilots declining agreed course dates at late notice etc etc. There is no 'typical' wait time in the hold pool. If you're non rated you are going to require a longer course and require more line training sectors than a rated pilot. If training capacity is an issue it might increase your wait time in the hold pool, it might not, depending on what the company's requirement is. Good luck. (I waited nearly a year for an interview then 2 months for the offer as a rated Airbus Captain. Others had offers immediately possibly due to base preference and notice period).

thank you.

GAPilot261087 16th Mar 2024 21:08

I'm in the same situation, Zeteo. I suspect it is very likely they will be figuring out their training capacity and programme for the end of this year.

zeteo 17th Mar 2024 09:00


Originally Posted by GAPilot261087 (Post 11617315)
I'm in the same situation, Zeteo. I suspect it is very likely they will be figuring out their training capacity and programme for the end of this year.

Thanks, GAPilot261087. Here's to hoping for some positive updates soon.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:00.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.