Leaving BA for low cost
Hi,
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock. So I'm looking for anyone that has done the same, to basically try and find out if they regretted it. And anybody else with any insight that might be helpful. Any help appreciated! TT |
There are a few junior A320 captains working their notice and going to EZY too. No great surprise those in the LHS look shocked. It ain’t the junior long haul life they lived. |
Not sure many will have done this. I was in the BA hold pool but decided last year to stay orange after moving right to left. For me, as a 7000 hour pilot and 10 years experience, it was the thought of reverting to two stripes and many years waiting for an upgrade in the BA seniority process that influenced my decision. I am not sure I would choose to leave though once I had started. I have no real interest in long haul at this stage but I do not know what the next 10 years might hold. In some ways the time to command in BA makes it a more valuable prize.
|
In response to TT (the OP) and: Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock 1. you are never going to get a quick upgrade on Long Haul, and 2. Post joining type freeze means you aren’t going to be moving to a relatively fast upgrade fleet for a few years ...
Originally Posted by Jwscud
(Post 10176920)
There are a few junior A320 captains working their notice and going to EZY too. No great surprise those in the LHS look shocked. It ain’t the junior long haul life they lived. It is a commonly held POV that large parts of the rostering system formerly known as Bidline has been trashed and the consequences of that have really bitten this summer. Nobody in either seat, regardless of seniority, can make concrete plans for days off even a month ahead, outside of leave. You can have successfully bid for work that gets you above the CAP and even so still get an extra trip stuck on your line/line rejigged- in other words forced overtime (July seems to have been bloodbath on the 744)........and to add to the problems as we head towards some fairly important elections for Union reps the association is giving a fair impression of being in disarray. |
it won’t be long and we’ll be seeing a lot more pilots leaving BA for other airlines. |
If the low cost life style suits you better then why not, but once you're there that's pretty much it as far as progression is concerned. The training department is the only step upward and it's not for everyone.
Lots of four sector days and early starts but mostly in your own bed at night, hard work and you will be tired but its a different kind of fatigue to long haul, back of the clock, multiple time zone changes. Financially, a LCC will get you into the money seat sooner but the pay isn't usually as good as a legacy. An older applicant will do better in an LCC as by the time he upgrades at a legacy airline he hasn't got too many years in the Captains chair until retirement, a younger applicant will do better in a legacy as he will have more years on premium pay to make up for the longer upgrade time. Horses for courses. |
I tried both. As a young stud I did long hauls and more long hauls, 30-40 hour duty days, around the world, crazy stuff. Did 24 years of it, then started short-haul, or turns as we say here in the colonies: MIA-STT-MIA and similar. I really liked to be home every day to wife and dog, sleep good then do it again next day. More time on the road driving to the airport, but got a good car and a subscription to satellite radio with the comedy channels. Figured that would be as much fun as I had all day and loved it. Did the occasional long haul, like MIA-MAD, or CDG but got tired of being tired, back to short haul. (on the 757/767 fleet you can do both and change every week or every month, perhaps same with BA?) |
Originally Posted by Tricia Takanawa
(Post 10176843)
Hi,
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock. So I'm looking for anyone that has done the same, to basically try and find out if they regretted it. And anybody else with any insight that might be helpful. Any help appreciated! TT |
Might be one for a current 747 pilot to answer - in the mean time obviously (?) the 747 Fleet is seeing a gradual reduction in “plum” destinations but it has still got some good ones. One even ended up in SIN last month as “sub” for the 380!!!! OTOH all the Longhaul Fleets are seeing some uncertainty and last minute plan changes due to the 787 engine issue. As for Longhaul life at BA in general - TBH I am increasingly of the opinion that many will find the model BA seem to be aiming for and one which BALPA seem to less and less able to moderate will be one that is unsustainable over a full time, multi decade career. A single person with minimal commitments outside work who additionally never gets a cold or flu might manage.....for mere mortals with families, especially young ones I have my doubts. |
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade I am now 75% part time to make my work life balance bearable. However I do not think that LC would be any easier than BA SH/LH unless you get a based where you live. Not necessarily an easy thing to achieve. I have conssideded that myself. But regardless make sure to think long term. What do you want in 10 years time and how do the T&C compare with LC when you get there. If you hang in there on the 747 until your freeze is up, you’d be almost guaranteed to get a A320 command at LGW. Do 6-12 months and then move to LC. At least you have your command time and you’ll have many more options. I know people who have chased quick commands, and it has rarely worked out, due to empty promises or unexpected downturn etc. Just my opinion. ATB with whatever you choose to do :) |
Re the SH Captains working their notice, I believe there are many more seriously looking around given many of the discussions I have had over the past year. I’m led to believe also that the latest recruitment campaign has not been as oversubscribed as it has been in the past. Perfect storm coming of people leaving and recruits not so much drying up perhaps but certainly not plentiful. Maybe this will wake Cruz and Walsh up to the fact that the constant attack on Ts & Cs is having real detrimental effects and will do in the future. (Wouldn’t hold my breath though) |
Originally Posted by Tricia Takanawa
(Post 10176843)
Hi,
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock. So I'm looking for anyone that has done the same, to basically try and find out if they regretted it. And anybody else with any insight that might be helpful. Any help appreciated! TT I left the 747 at BA to go back to low cost. Haven't regretted it for a minute. Feel free to PM me if you want any more info. Good luck. It's a massive decision to make but for me it worked out well. Everyone is different depending on their circumstances. |
I also jumped ship from the Queen of the Skies at BA to head to low cost shorthaul. People were shocked - I even shocked myself - but in hindsight I’m a whole load happier. The reality is I should never have gone to BA in the first place but I’m still glad I tried it. Edited to say I completely agree with Wiggy and planning my life at BA was nigh on impossible and work basically rules your life unless you have leave / duty free week etc planned. For those single chaps / chapesses it’s fine but for those of us with family commitments I find the low cost roster (although still tiring) way better. Having a command also makes work far more enjoyable. I did think about BAP’s idea of bidding for an LGW command after initial type freeze was up (5 years) but then thought why wait 5 years for something I already had at easyJet? Money is not the be-all and end-all but the financial incentives also stacked up being LHS low cost. Best of luck in your decision making! |
Thank you for all of the info, including the PM's! Its nice to know that I'm not nuts considering it.
BAP, I've been in just shy of 3 years. Funny you should mention EK, as I did consider that option, then read the Middle East forums :eek: |
Originally Posted by Tricia Takanawa
(Post 10177341)
Thank you for all of the info, including the PM's! Its nice to know that I'm not nuts considering it.
BAP, I've been in just shy of 3 years. Funny you should mention EK, as I did consider that option, then read the Middle East forums :eek: |
Having done UK regional flying, the sandpit, and now BA LH, I – personally – find BA the easiest of the three. That said, it probably helps being on the 787, as everyone else is doing our flying for us. :)
Also, I don’t mind working weekends and am in a position where I can prioritise lifestyle over cash or command, so I’m quite content in the RHS. I quite understand that others will have different priorities, for all sorts of reasons. But like what Wiggy said: many will find the model BA seem to be aiming for and one which BALPA seem to less and less able to moderate will be one that is unsustainable over a full time, multi decade career. |
My take on it is BA is now very much just another airline, and the full time job has pretty much become unsustainable for an entire career, particularly since the introduction of EASA FTLs. Life expectancy will seriously reduce for anyone who attempts it. Part time is the way forward, and once you’re going down that route, you’re looking more and more at lifestyle choices, and being based at Heathrow is not one of the better lifestyle choices. I’ll have been in for 20 years by the time I get my first command, but once I have sufficient command hours, I’ll be looking very seriously at other airlines. Working for BA has drained the life out of me. I’m constantly bewildered by anyone who leaves another airline to join up. I don’t think outsiders appreciate just how weak, and indeed actively damaging, BALPA within BA is. Our decline at the hands of the current BACC has exceeded all expectations. |
Our decline at the hands of the current BACC has exceeded all expectations. |
LC even admits on Yammer that DEP’s are signing or being offered contracts to start & then turning them down! Quite simply we’re not the only/best gig in town... However long may it continue... the only way things will improve is if people stop coming! ‘Part of the CAP pressure has also been down to some DEPs signing contracts with us, and then withdrawing, for various reasons’ |
I’m in the land of Orange LHS. We have a bid preference that so far is working really well for me. I asked for all 2 sector days for July, all my duties are 2 sectors apart from 2 days and a good portion of my 2 sectors are short days, Edi and back etc. Really made a difference to how tired I feel, regional base so my winter was rather quiet and so far touch wood my summer as been steady. Paywise you can look at it in two ways, yes, BA will have a higher salary but how long will it take to reach it? If you actually get that far? EZY basic CPT is 105k alone, add on sector pay, loyalty bonus (15%) after 10 years, share awards, performance bonus. It all adds up and you’ll be earning much more quicker than at BA. Depends what you want, like your own bed and wish to see your kids or live on the continent, don’t think you can do better than EZY. Want to see the world on someone’s expense, BA it is. Regional base with EZY is a brilliant gig overall, not perfect but no job is. |
Excellent thread...how do the benefits stack up at somewhere like EZY compared to BA? Medical/Dental /loss of licence etc. Obviously staff travel is completely different so that’s not really part of the question. Thanks
|
You get loss of licence. There is a benefits page and every year you select what benefits you want, some are dental, health, childcare, increase loss of licence. Some of the options allows you to make a saving on taxes. Private health care care has been spoken about, tried to use it as a bargaining chip on the last pay deal but it was rejected. It poor that EZY still doesn’t off this to all employees, think it’s the only U.K. airline that doesn’t include private health in its standard package. |
Originally Posted by BASHLH
(Post 10177758)
LC even admits on Yammer that DEP’s are signing or being offered contracts to start & then turning them down! Sadly LC is but a small cog in a big machine. |
Originally Posted by Stone Cold II
(Post 10177762)
Regional base with EZY is a brilliant gig overall, not perfect but no job is. |
Originally Posted by speed freek
(Post 10177973)
For balance, if the OP were to join today, how long would he or she be waiting for that regional base? Be prepared to spend many a year at LGW where things aren't so rosy.
I am now a LHS commuter on a 71% contract, or a 7/7 as it is called. In real life it often works out as a 5/9 or 6/8 roster. (yes often 9 days off ;) ) Would not even swap this for a direct entry CMD into a 744 if offered. |
I'm an experienced Boeing SFO at another UK airline (the red and silver one) and would love a European base, particularly PMI... is there any chance easy will get rid of or lower the type rating cost as that is a major barrier to me applying?
|
Originally Posted by speed freek
(Post 10177973)
For balance, if the OP were to join today, how long would he or she be waiting for that regional base? Be prepared to spend many a year at LGW where things aren't so rosy.
|
Originally Posted by Cmon-PullUP
(Post 10178009)
Depends on the base you want. Most start out where the need is for the company, and then sign up on the transfer lists. However, there are still choices + Ezy is fairly easy commuting wise if you need that. LGW is not all that bad as some claim - I certainly enjoyed my years there.
I am now a LHS commuter on a 71% contract, or a 7/7 as it is called. In real life it often works out as a 5/9 or 6/8 roster. (yes often 9 days off ;) ) Would not even swap this for a direct entry CMD into a 744 if offered. I don’t blame you, sounds great! How easy is it to get part time roster generally in the U.K. but specifically at LGW? Also, is that a fixed pattern or FRV? Cheers! |
Thanks for all of the info. Lots of great stuff.
RE EZY. I would be looking at LGW or LTN. Could anyone provide a few typical early and late rotations that one could expect. And am I right in thinking around 18ths to 2 years currently for a cmd? Also, considering the other Low Cost airlines. Does anyone have any good info on Wizz Air? Ryanair only seem to recruit 737 rated FO's unless you want a Sicily base. Is this correct? Thanks again for all the great input. |
Originally Posted by whitemonk
(Post 10178055)
I'm an experienced Boeing SFO
;) |
Originally Posted by GS-Alpha
(Post 10177626)
My take on it is BA is now very much just another airline, and the full time job has pretty much become unsustainable for an entire career, particularly since the introduction of EASA FTLs. Life expectancy will seriously reduce for anyone who attempts it. Part time is the way forward, and once you’re going down that route, you’re looking more and more at lifestyle choices, and being based at Heathrow is not one of the better lifestyle choices. I’ll have been in for 20 years by the time I get my first command, but once I have sufficient command hours, I’ll be looking very seriously at other airlines. Working for BA has drained the life out of me. I’m constantly bewildered by anyone who leaves another airline to join up. I don’t think outsiders appreciate just how weak, and indeed actively damaging, BALPA within BA is. Our decline at the hands of the current BACC has exceeded all expectations. Gissa clue then what parts of EASA FTL will cause life expectancy to drop. In many parts EASA FTL is similar to Sub Part Q which was deployed in Europe for years and years. Is it the old factorisation of flights over 7 hours in CAP371 something that was introduced when Flight Engineers left the cockpit...... |
Interesting thread. Just out of interest this argument only exists because of the existence of DEC and “rapid commands” at the LCCs. The reasons for this are two fold, high turn over of staff and rapid growth. Is it reasonable to expect these two things to continue? We have already estabilished that terms and conditions etc are equal to or better than the legacy rivals so why would people leave? Furthermore how much more expansion can these companies accommodate, between Easy and Ryan they must have close to 1000 airframes and post Brexit will this/ can this contine? I am just wondering if it was possible for some to jump ship to Easy then sudenly find themselves tapped in the RHS for 10 years, then this whole argument becomes extremely different! Plus is basing an issue, to my mind there is no point in taking a command if it means having to live in a different country to you wife and children. Like many I have been extremely disillusioned by my experience of joining BA and have often pondered about jumping ship, but this fear of the above somehow always puts me off. |
GK - Have you seen what’s actually possible under EASA? It’s only our industrial agreements (which are being constantly chipped away at) stopping long haul from becoming absolutely miserable. Brakes on at 0500 from JNB and report at 1800 for JFK? Sure, why not... No more 4 crew trips? No problem... Our flat earthers are subject to full EASA limits -30 minutes. I assure you they are not happy about it and those without much time invested in our precious seniority list have left/will leave/are considering their options. Cheers Buter |
Originally Posted by Enzo999
(Post 10178157)
Interesting thread. Just out of interest this argument only exists because of the existence of DEC and “rapid commands” at the LCCs. The reasons for this are two fold, high turn over of staff and rapid growth. Is it reasonable to expect these two things to continue? We have already estabilished that terms and conditions etc are equal to or better than the legacy rivals so why would people leave? Furthermore how much more expansion can these companies accommodate, between Easy and Ryan they must have close to 1000 airframes and post Brexit will this/ can this contine? I am just wondering if it was possible for some to jump ship to Easy then sudenly find themselves tapped in the RHS for 10 years, then this whole argument becomes extremely different! Plus is basing an issue, to my mind there is no point in taking a command if it means having to live in a different country to you wife and children. Like many I have been extremely disillusioned by my experience of joining BA and have often pondered about jumping ship, but this fear of the above somehow always puts me off. Compare that to the US with close to 1000 planes in total between southwest and jet blue, not to mention the other ones, in a home market with something like 330 million customers, vs around 500 million in the EU alone, not to mention the other european states or even northern africa which is in range of narrowbody aircraft. |
Originally Posted by Enzo999
(Post 10178157)
Interesting thread. Just out of interest this argument only exists because of the existence of DEC and “rapid commands” at the LCCs. The reasons for this are two fold, high turn over of staff and rapid growth. Is it reasonable to expect these two things to continue? We have already estabilished that terms and conditions etc are equal to or better than the legacy rivals so why would people leave? Furthermore how much more expansion can these companies accommodate, between Easy and Ryan they must have close to 1000 airframes and post Brexit will this/ can this contine? I am just wondering if it was possible for some to jump ship to Easy then sudenly find themselves tapped in the RHS for 10 years, then this whole argument becomes extremely different! Plus is basing an issue, to my mind there is no point in taking a command if it means having to live in a different country to you wife and children. Like many I have been extremely disillusioned by my experience of joining BA and have often pondered about jumping ship, but this fear of the above somehow always puts me off. In my view, the expansion will very much continue and the pressure on Ryanair to keep the salaries competitve will be high. |
And now, that Lufthansa is going to buy Norwegian, BA is going to struggle even more.
Mind You anyone with BA experience will be a shoe-in at Norwegian LH ! Good time to change! |
Hmm, a lot of sh1t stirring here and firing about of fake news.
I know of one guy who has left for a DEC A330 job in China but he commutes from NYC, he was a junior captain on the A320. A few people have turned down courses but they've also been sat in the hold pool for almost 2 years, if BA offered them contracts straight away I guess it would have been a different story. |
Originally Posted by BluSdUp
(Post 10178582)
And now, that Lufthansa is going to buy Norwegian, BA is going to struggle even more.
Mind You anyone with BA experience will be a shoe-in at Norwegian LH ! Good time to change! |
Originally Posted by student88
(Post 10178607)
Hmm, a lot of sh1t stirring here and firing about of fake news.
....A few people have turned down courses but they've also been sat in the hold pool for almost 2 years, if BA offered them contracts straight away I guess it would have been a different story. |
Enzo
My mistake, BA is doing great. And , Yes LH is looking at Norwegian. seriously. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:02. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.