Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Now you need 2000h jet to fly a SE Turboprop!

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Now you need 2000h jet to fly a SE Turboprop!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2013, 16:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now you need 2000h jet to fly a SE Turboprop!

Job Openings · Amac Aerospace
angelorange is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2013, 16:38
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On SBY next to my phone
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Most boat drivers calls the turboprop a jet-engine, don't worry it's not that bad yet
TypeIV is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2013, 16:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: US
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if you put a 10,000hr for E.G., jet jockey in a SE T/P you could be asking for trouble.

Oh the relative simplicity of a jet, turbojet!
screwballburling is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2013, 17:27
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 04°11′30″N 073°31′45″E
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahaha incredible! with those requirement I go straight onto EK 777!
I-AINC is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2013, 19:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And what if you read between the lines? I'll bet this a "private" operation. You'll earn good money, stay in posh hotels and probably eat very well. You'll probably get to drive your principal's cars/boats/motorcycles as well. But in return they expect a rounded, well qualified pilot who won't bugger off as soon as soon as jet job pops up.
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 02:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Calling the PC 12 NG merely a SE turboprop shows a lot about your (lack of) aviation knowledge.

You guys think, by any chance, that flying RHS EK B777 compares in any way to flying LHS on a business aviation PC 12?
C212-100 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 07:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Jet Provost 3 was a jet (barely!), replaced by the Jet Provost 5 with improved performance, replaced by the Tucano T/P, massive improvement in performance!

PC 12 NG is fantastic to fly however, as an on call pilot to the Middle East with 350hrs per year, expect alot of sitting around time and not much time at home unless your primary spends most of their time in Switzerland!

Otherwise, fantastic flying to be had in what seems a very responsible, negotiated salary ( ;-) ) position.
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 08:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vega Constellation
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you look at other job openings on their website, it states the same requirements for Global Express or Falcon 7X.

It seems to be a bad copy/paste, or the requirements are here to ensure you can move to a bigger bird later.
FLEXPWR is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 19:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wirbelsturm,
The tuc was cheaper to run than thr JP Mk5 but no way better performance!
qwertyuiop is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2013, 22:27
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

C212

You are entitled to your ignorance about my aviation knowledge! Yes, I have much to learn but a PC12 is a SE TP and my point was (as one who has Military and Civilian Jet and Turboprop experience and a degree in Aeronautics) TP jobs should be open to those with significant TP time not just jet jockies!

However I see the point others make if the fleet is mixed.
angelorange is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2013, 02:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORTUGAL
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
angelorange,

Also from a guy with military an civilian experience (with a degree in Aeronautics as well) having flown TP an jet I still insist that the PC 12NG is not a mere TP. Even more when you grealize that some operators use it on a single-piling operation.

This job opening from AMAC looks like a PIC position on a private operation. Given that I can understand why the owner of the aircraft requires that amount of experience.

TP jobs (as SIC or as DEC) should be for those with TP experience, I totally agree. But the PC 12 NG is not a regular TP...

Nevertheless I do feel the need to apologyze for my harsh statement. I could have made a different choice of words. My bad.
C212-100 is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2013, 07:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Planet Moo Moo
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tuc was cheaper to run than thr JP Mk5 but no way better performance!
Probably my memory confusing it with the JP3! The JP5 was fun but then I enjoyed the Tucano immensly (quite a fair few years later I might add) so I'm probably a little biased!
Wirbelsturm is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 07:22
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: over there
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At Ryanair you need 20,000.

Euro.
somethingclever is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 19:43
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: On cloud 9
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 2000 hrs jet PIC could also be to avoid the dreamers who will leave at first sight of a jet-job.

Those with 2000 hrs pic on a jet have learnt - hopefully - that it's about quality of life and other such stuff, rather than about how shiny the plane is. They might end up getting applicants who want the job for the long term instead of some smuck who leaves them at first light with no pilot and loads of problems.

This is pilots own fault. Too many is running for the shiny metal without any wish to do the real flying, so companies need to weed out in the crowds. Looks to me like a company that is actually thinking ahead and planning to employ quality instead of quantity

Good on them, I hope some lucky guy will find he's long term dream job here
Cmon-PullUP is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2013, 20:03
  #15 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 34 Likes on 17 Posts
At Luton, there was an Apache job with a requirement for 8,000 hours. "we have Pan AM contracts. So need . . . bla bla bla."


Used to be for the early 1-11s. 8,000 for command, and 4,600 for F/O.

After two weeks, they wrote to me saying my flying had improved so much I could be an F/O with my measly 1,500 hours on the Viscount.
Loose rivets is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.