Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Singapore Airlines Info

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Singapore Airlines Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Nov 2012, 06:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Singapore Airlines Info

Hello gents,

From the little information I can gather, it seems to be a good place to work, but I can't seem to find information on pay and entry requirements for expat FO's.

I'd appreciate if somebody could steer me in the right direction.

Thanks
Check Airman is online now  
Old 22nd Nov 2012, 07:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Within ASEAN
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SQ not renewing contracts for DEC

Just to take note that SQ does not take in Direct Entry FOs as they have their
own supply from their cadet pilot programme. At the moment they have excess
FOs in their ranks and have stopped recruitment for Ab initios as well. As a complimentary measure SQ is encouraging FOs to take no pay leave to Qatar, Eva etc. In the past they have recruited DECs on rare instances but the latest is that they are not renewing expat contracts anymore. Hope that helps
skinz is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2012, 07:20
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that's certainly not what I was hoping to hear, but thanks anyway. What's the salary and QOL like?
Check Airman is online now  
Old 22nd Nov 2012, 22:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The salary is not the highest in the industry and the cost of living is very high, add to that rent, school fees etc. and an FOs pay won't go very far.
parabellum is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 03:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the info.
Check Airman is online now  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 05:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The salary is not the highest in the industry
I know a former colleague who's currently working for SIA as Captain 777 and he easily takes home around 19K USD pm. This is AFTER taxes!
Of course this includes his house rent allowance. He has no kids in school.
I have seen his salary slips on many an occasion.
Just to let you know.
Germanflyer is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2012, 09:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The lion city
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
German flyers

Sorry to say that your friends contract will not be renew in the future.
etops777 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 01:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On a Wing!
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm certain this colleague of yours Germanflyer, has made more money in a few years with SIA than we would make in most of our lives at that rate.
Are ALL DEC contracts not being renewed or is it on a case to case basis.

Last edited by King on a Wing; 24th Nov 2012 at 01:29.
King on a Wing is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 13:37
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The lion city
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
King on the wing

The latest from the managements is when the contract of the expats are due for a renewal then those contract will not be renewed. Therefore all of those on the expats term will be gone in the near future. SQ is overstaffed with pilots on both seats.
etops777 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2012, 16:13
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even SQ cannot compete with the likes of Qatar, Etihad and Emirates with their hidden cost base.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 10:12
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It must be hard to compete when you are paying the entire cost of ab initios. I wonder what the cost is per pilot.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2012, 23:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On a Wing!
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Millerscourt,
Would you care to explain your post please. I'm not sure I understand. Do QR/EY/EK pay higher. I'm quite certain that's not the case. But i'm not sure that's what you meant.
Thanks
King on a Wing is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 03:33
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: SouthEastAsia
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JammedStab
It must be hard to compete when you are paying the entire cost of ab initios. I wonder what the cost is per pilot.
Not quite so. Singapore Air has its own training facilities that appeared costly, but financially (accounting purpose), it's a tax haven on top of having full control of numbers of copilots they churn out each year.

The training cost is highly inflated to ensure profit write down, resulting savings in liable tax. The trainees are obligated to pay back a portion of training cost, not a big amount, and in installments.

Ab initials are required to observe a bond of 7 years, after being fully qualified in the right seat. Anyways, the locals are generally not adventurous, 99% stick around. I would too consider the overall job security and stability.

Right now financially they are heading south mainly due to downtown of luxurious travel segment and the caught up by many other regional carriers to compete against SQ sliding service quality. Excess pilots are not as big a cost issue since only basic pay is guaranteed.

Flexicrew
flexicrew is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 07:31
  #14 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

compete against SQ sliding service quality
Would agree with just about all you said except the above quote, recent return trip to Amsterdam and the SQ cabin service was as good as it was twenty years ago, possibly the best or equal best Economy class service to be found anywhere.
parabellum is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 07:53
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: UK
Age: 53
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that's because you were in economy. business class pax have been turning away from SQ because if the lottery on the hard product they can receive.
highflyer40 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 08:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
King on a Wing

Airlines like Emirates, Qatar, and Etihad can pay lower salaries as there is no income tax which is a hidden subsidy. Also most of their ground staff and cabin crew are from poor third world countries.

They can also offer free accommodation for pilots due to low building costs and land values. Can you imagine what it would cost to give Pilots free accommodation near Heathrow or New York? Pilots are interested in their take home pay after deductions and other costs they would incur in their home country compared to the Gulf and unless you work for work for one of the Main Airlines in the world one is much better off in the Gulf although there is a price to pay which does not suit everyone.

Infrastructure costs like building accommodation ,hangars etc are built on desert land which is owned by the ruling families in the main using dirt cheap labour. Have you ever thought where they all live in the desert when you see them being driven around in the back of open trucks?

Desert does not have the same value or cost as land in Singapore or London Heathrow or New York, so all those costs are much lower than competitors so they can have shiny new aircraft with all the IFE where once Singapore had that kind of advantage over airlines like BA or QF all to themselves they now have the Gulf Airlines with an even lower cost base.

Even in Singapore one used to see ( and probably still do?) labourers from the Indian subcontinent being driven around in open pick up trucks.

SQ also have other competitors operating from there particularly for short haul routes which they never had a few years ago. Hence they hived off SIA Cargo as a separate airline to reduce costs and now Scoot and expand Silk Air all of which have a lower cost base which in turn reduces the need for such a large number of aircraft in the SQ fleet.

Last edited by millerscourt; 27th Nov 2012 at 08:54.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 09:14
  #17 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,094
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

business class pax have been turning away from SQ because if the lottery on
the hard product they can receive.
Sorry, don't understand that statement. I appreciate that Etihad and Qatar are offering cheaper seats on very modern aircraft but in the premium cabins the SQ product is still rated top by Business and First class travellers.
parabellum is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 10:00
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: El Dorado
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airlines like Emirates, Qatar, and Etihad can pay lower salaries as there is no income tax which is a hidden subsidy. Also most of their ground staff and cabin crew are from poor third world countries.
Mid Eastern airlines might have the benefit of gross=net salary because of the no income tax, but they pay the difference by having to provide housing. I really doubt the gross personnel costs are that much lower in the Mid East.

They can also offer free accommodation for pilots due to low building costs and land values.
So housing is "free" eh? See my comment above.

Even SQ cannot compete with the likes of Qatar, Etihad and Emirates with their hidden cost base.
So? Are you telling us SQ's salaries are so high? SQ T&C's are notoriously low for a national flag carrier, especially in relation to the sky high cost of living in SIN. Ever been to SIN?

It must be hard to compete when you are paying the entire cost of ab initios. I wonder what the cost is per pilot.
Already debunked.

Desert does not have the same value or cost as land in Singapore or London Heathrow or New York...
Yes, maybe the land is cheap, but what about construction materials? EVERYTHING needs to be imported, every nail, every brick, every piece of steel, every bag of cement!

I've seldom seen such poor 3rd world thinking and reasoning in one thread! People thinking that housing is "free" and that the cost of a few ab initios (great tax benefit, as discussed earlier) is going to cripple a huge airline.
LLuCCiFeR is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 10:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LL

Biggest cost of construction is Land Costs and Labour both of which are low in the Gulf.

Singapore has to import building materials as well and although their pilot's salaries are low these days other infrastructure costs are far higher than the Gulf Airlines.
Ever been to SIN you asked?? Yes worked for SQ for many years.

I also never commented on ab initio costs.
millerscourt is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2012, 10:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah but SQ are really just part of the whole Singapore Govt. - they are REALLY important to the country and the idea that "costs" incurred are calculated on anything like the same basis as say for Lufthansa is ... unlikely......

they've been hurting due to the economic downturn but nothing like as bad as others (see QF)
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.