Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Carbon footprint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th May 2008 | 23:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Kerikeri New Zealand
Carbon footprint

Can any one advise me as to the method of calculating the amount of carbon emissions from a one kilogram of fuel.
The local pundits come up with about 26 kilos of carbon gasses for one kilo of jet fuel.
My calculations are roughly four time the fuel mass burned, is the max carbon emissions.
That is One of fuel plus three of oxygen. (the nitrogen does not burn.)
Am I correct, or nearly correct????
gulfairs is offline  
Reply
Old 17th May 2008 | 23:25
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 219
Likes: 17
From: Ask crewing
How is this relevant to terms and endearment?

try www.treehuggersandnimbys.com
FL370 Officeboy is offline  
Reply
Old 18th May 2008 | 07:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,914
Likes: 0
From: UK
The answer is 'who cares?' A darn good volcano and natural carbon emissions makes the jet fuel produced carbon issue totally insignificant. It's all a tax raising con, so stop wasting your time with it and go out with girls instead!
Notso Fantastic is offline  
Reply
Old 18th May 2008 | 08:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
The answer is 'who cares?' A darn good volcano and natural carbon emissions makes the jet fuel produced carbon issue totally insignificant.
Whilst that fact isn't exactly true, I agree, who cares?! Human production of CO2 is miniscule in comparison with the amount of CO2 the seas release when the sun warms them up - google solubility pump or take a look at this link http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/.

It's all a tax raising con
Spot on. Every government agency and marketing executive jumped for joy when someone keyed the term 'Carbon Footprint' which implies a cause and effect ie we go about our normal business trying to earn a crust and what do you know, we're killing the planet with our carbon footprint. Of course, carbon footprints can be measured which inevitably means that a tax will follow - tangible equals taxable.
mid_life_pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 18th May 2008 | 11:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Manchester,uk
Angry

I sniff a journalist and or greenie trying to get information. You can see the headlines; "pilots admit they are killing the planet" Go away and play on the Guardian website instead.
northern boy is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2008 | 03:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Origae-6
Well said Mid Life
400drvr is offline  
Reply
Old 19th May 2008 | 15:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
In 1980 Mount St. Helens [alone] spewed more CO2 into the atmosphere than did all the world's automobiles since day 1. Global warming cycles [and ice ages] in the past 4.5 billion years are real happenings, but it hasn't been, nor is it now a man made phenomena. We've only been around the last 1.3 million years. The "carbon footprint" generated by humans is so infinitesimal, that to try to quantify it would be like dabbling in useless information.
GlueBall is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.