Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

why cant recruitment agencies just get to the point ?

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

why cant recruitment agencies just get to the point ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 14:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why cant recruitment agencies just get to the point ?

Dont know about you , but why dont the contract agencies just say when they advertise where the damn job is going to be offered. Instead of places like " central" of " favourable" why not just say " India" or " China"
, to simply stop wasting the time of those who are not interested in working in some of the area's they remain ellusive about. Just a thought guys and gals , just say it the way it is and save us all a lot of time.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 15:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloud Cookoo Land
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are probably all ex estate agents!
Callsign Kilo is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2007, 15:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They don't want all the other agencies reading their ads, working out who the employer is, calling them, and placing their own guys in there. The recruiter is making between 15% and 30% of your pay, so why give away all the details of a juicy deal by saying exactly where the job is?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2007, 13:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: West Britain
Age: 74
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps PPRuNe should set up a 'Situations Wanted' area where experienced pilots looking for work can post their details, then the agencies (or even airlines) could contact them. It might even be more efficient as I seem to remember an EasyChap at a recruitment day bemoaning the fact that they had 10 000 + on the on-line database with the vast majority not meeting minimum requirements. Just a thought.
BristolScout is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: I'm Not Telling
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good idea - and we could be just a vague......

A 'front of transport' operative with favourable licences from a main ICAO region has an interesting and in-demand type rating. Backed up by a wealth of hours in a number of training and operational aircraft. Seeking substantial renumeration package, numerous benefits and location close to major economic centres. Send £50 with each application to [email protected]
Cim Jartner is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 10:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hahaha! This is a great idea! I'll stop working and just milk cash from "application" fees!
CaptainProp is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 16:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cloud 9
Posts: 2,948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is true that locations are often concealed in attempt to eliminate the opposition but the suggestion that an agency revenues 30% of the salary ..... well I wish

Recently had a 'comedian' apply, has the wrong licence, wrong passport, indeed very wrong attitude, stating that the final decision on the position would be his.

Very wrong 'sunshine', the final decision lay with the airline based on the licence, the passport and indeed the attitude
Phileas Fogg is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2007, 21:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down Phileas

Perhaps he was tongue in cheek and was attempting to start attacking just what this thread bemoaned.
Just like joining a secret society you seem to be expected to lay yourself bare to some website or send your life to a fax number for this info to be hawked around for a job in a place you don't know for a company you don't know, sometimes for Ts and Cs you aren't told about!!!
Bat Fastard is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 03:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Springfield
Posts: 735
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You have it good, only $50 for United. QANTAS of Australia is $150 for the first interview, plus make your way there on short notice, plus you pay for the sim ride, and have to make you own way back to Sydney for that a few week later, then they want their own doctors to do a medical on you, and oh yes, you pay for that too, even though you have a class one.

In the last few years, 70%+ of their hiring has been done through their Jetstar brand and so you are then on a Jet star contract, then you have to pay them approx $40k and you don’t even get paid during your initial training. And they reckon there is a pilot shortage in oz, yeah right !

But the dash-8 is only $15k. And they never pay you back.

FK off QF
Ejector is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 04:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Simple answer to Quaintass and others recruitment philosophy is don't apply. They'll work it out once they run out of applicants and start parking their aircraft.
bloggs2 is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 06:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: lapbandland
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I put the recruitment agencies and corporate aircraft management
companies in the same boat as lawyers and real estate agents.
They are PARASITES on humanity and serve only themselves.
They just prove that airlines/aircraft owners would pay more,
but simply can't be bothered dealing directly with pilots.
Try to bypass these fleas, and talk directly to airlines/owners.
boofta is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2007, 07:46
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not necessarily true. Working on a leasing contract via an agency saves the airline the money required for National Insurance and taxation contribution. The margin that the agencies make is usually less than this.
Also, if an airline just needs some contract pilots for 3 months for example, it is easier and less costly in terms of legalities and manhours to get the pilots from an agency.
In addition to that, the current payscales of a carrier for pilots working directly with them might not be attractive enough to get the extra pilots needed. The airline would be willing to pay more for a contractor for a few months rather than incurring the long term costs of recruiting someone directly (including compensation for terminating a contract). This way they avoid increasing salaries across the board in order to keep everyone else happy.
Red Raven is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2007, 00:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach SC
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pissed myself reading these posts

Read them all and I hope you are all joking, I had to change my shorts after reading some of them. Granted there are some bad recruitment firms but, there are also some good ones. I have found that the smaller ones are more reputable than the larger. The biggies are the tail and the airlines are the dog, so guess who gets wagged - right down to us, the flea on the tail. The big firms do nothing more than drive the wages down.
buckdadog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.