Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Shameful behaviour by a well established FTO

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Shameful behaviour by a well established FTO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2001 | 17:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: cambridge uk
Post Shameful behaviour by a well established FTO

Need some advice, so here is the story....
I joined a credible UK FTO to obtain my ATPL. Start the training all is fine, run into many problems alomg the way but heard many tales of 'rocking the boat will upset those who may help you in the future' so i kept a record of all the things that niggled me for when i finished the training. So i eventually pass all the groundschool and flying complete my MCC then expected the school to set the paperwork machine in motion like it does with every other student. NO! not for me, they misplace my paperwork for two months! Eventually with a little pestering i get it sent off, now the icing on the cake! I am in dispute over a bill which is costs surplus to the contracted price of the course but the school will not hand over my licence which only arrived last wednesday (thats the 19th september 2001) untill i pay this bill. I have calculated what i owe them but they want yet more letters from various departments to authorise all the changes in costs. In the mean time i am trying to prise my licence out of their sticky paws but they will not give it to me. I have reviewed the contract i initially signed and its speaks of nothing regarding the holding of documents without payment. I have sent a fax explaining the situation to the CAA. Does anybody have any legal knowledge that can help me as this is hindering my job hunting, i have an application form but can't fill in all the licence details yet.

To sumarise, is this within the rights of the school to effectively impound my JAA FRozen ATPL until i pay costs surplus to the original training contract?

Please help if you can!

regards
eagerbeaver is offline  
Old 24th September 2001 | 17:52
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,627
Likes: 2
From: UTC +8
Exclamation

No lawyers at Cambridge? Check with Law librarian at Cambridge University for free legal advice if you are indigent. Good luck.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 24th September 2001 | 18:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

A contract law case-
What have you signed for?
Did you sign up for over budget training
If so you may be in breach of contact if you
havent coughed up...
RVR800 is offline  
Old 25th September 2001 | 17:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Post

Call the CAA and find out what is involved in obtaining a duplicate licence...?
126.9 is offline  
Old 25th September 2001 | 21:42
  #5 (permalink)  
Flintstone
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

Contract and the possible breach thereof is one thing but where do they get off witholding the guys licence?

Not impressed at all.
 
Old 25th September 2001 | 22:53
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 17,519
Likes: 1,852
From: England
Post

Well actually its common practice if there is a dispute.

You cannot have duplicate licences as I understand it. You can have replacement ones. At a cost.

Sometimes the sympathy lies with the school and sometimes the student - I care not to comment in this case and have no knowledge.

My advice would be dialogue. Resorting to letter writing campaigns and lawyers is usually far more painful for the person than the FTO.

Call them, ask to meet, badger them. By all means use PPRuNe to publicise your predicament as long as you are willing to make your real ID available and post nothing but the truth to avoid any legal issues which we would pass onto your shoulders.

Talk, compromise, rationalise. These would be my watch words. The CAA won't actually give a damn about you. Its a contractural issue and they are far too busy coping with the current unprecedented aviation crisis.

Good luck,


WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 25th September 2001 | 23:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Uranus
Talking

I'm with Flintstone on this one, outrageous behaviour, seriously unimpressed. As if they havn't had enough cash from him already. Perhaps if they gave him his licence he could then maybe find work and have an income from which to pay this bill. No licence means no job which means no cash for the bill.............
Surely the deal is that the CAA issue the licence to the chap who's name is on it, not some school? My advice is to pester the CAA.
This situation is clearly bad form.


StressFree is offline  
Old 26th September 2001 | 01:58
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Post

In essence, a replacement licence would have to be a duplicate of the original. The word duplicate, is also synonymous with copy, carbon copy, photocopy, replacement, spare, reproduction, and replica, amongst others of course. So, clearly one can have a duplicate licence.

Edited for spelling. Multi-lingual fluency does take practice.

[ 25 September 2001: Message edited by: 126.9 ]
126.9 is offline  
Old 26th September 2001 | 13:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Africa
Post

I agree with Flintstone. Your licence is a legal document pertaining to, and belonging to you. As far as I am concerned no unauthorised person is allowed to sieze or hold your licence. Only the appropriate authorities such as the CAA or the police of the country of issue are able to do that. I don't believe the FTO has the authority to withhold it while a contractual dispute is underway. It does not belong to them and they have no jurisdiction over it. (BTW, totally uneducated legal opinion though it is, it's what I have been led to believe here in South Africa.)
Cardinal Puff is offline  
Old 26th September 2001 | 15:58
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: cambridge uk
Post

I am in the middle on typing up my drievances with the school but as you can guess i want to make sure it is water tight before i send it to them. The guy who will be dealing with it is very hard to get hold of and can be only reached if you make an appointment, the staff in general are very stroppy otherv than the nice lady who i have been negotiating with. Spoken and written to the CAA about this and they say that it is a dispute between myself and the school although the head of standards has taken note i believe. I am fully prepared to reveal my true identity and the FTO is needs be here, but i can't see what that will achieve other than worry future students to this particualr school - therefore i will keep stum - for now.
Lawyer out the question, too much hassle and he can't do an awful lot. The FTO cannot lawfully do this too me as i explained in the original post but i will be dammed if they will win this argument, they push people about, lie to prospective students and mess you around whilst you are training and something needs to be done about. I MUST STRESS THE FACT IT IS A MANAGEMENT PROBLEM. I have turned into a bitter twisted little ****** haven't I? i was once cheerful.
Its gonna take some time. Thanks for the responses i will delve into the law a little deeper i think.
all the best
eagerbeaver is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.