Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

merge CCP and Aeropers

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

merge CCP and Aeropers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2001, 19:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: high up above
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post merge CCP and Aeropers

I strongly believe that the two unions should merge as quickly as possible. by mixing the two groups it'll be a lot easier for all concerned to form one pilotbody before we actually have to work together next year.
efcop is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2001, 19:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Basel CH
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

Interesting point of view, but you could do us all a favour by MERGING this post with the one cited below.


http://www.pprune.org/cgibin/ultimatebb .cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=27&t=000388&p=3

This will keep the number of topics down and will provide a better overview.

[ 01 November 2001: Message edited by: Saab 2000 Driver ]
Saab 2000 Driver is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2001, 16:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: high up above
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

it was intentional. I'm trying to get away from the "versus" bit. this isn't a fight until one is down for good.
efcop is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2001, 07:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: By the sea
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Efcop:

I think you're probably well-intended with this seemingly constructive suggestion, but I have to strongly disagree with you.

The only viable alternative available to the executive of Aeropers is to resign en masse immediately.

They can have no possible part to play in any furture representative group at Crossair, and should do the decent thing and rapidly vanish into the history books.

They have been exposed to the world, thanks to the Arena program, as imbeciles more interested in the continuation of their tawdry second rate industrial gangsters club, than doing anything positive to promote the future of Swiss civil aviation.

This is the time for a bold new thrust into the world of International Air Transport, and the last thing we need is a gaggle of cankered thugs lurking in the shadows.

[ 05 November 2001: Message edited by: YakYak ]
YakYak is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2001, 18:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

YY you are being impolite yet again! If you are looking for thugs ,look closer to home & I don´t mean the CCP or LX pilots.I bet youré on the bottom of the seniority list; are you afraid of something ? do you miss Cranwell?I have to say I sense an innate instability & a tendency to rant.Nothing personal of course, but these characteristics are not ideal in a professional, especially an aviator,do you know any Aeropers board members?(no, not me I assure you )the ccp are now isolated from the world ,no Swiss Alpa,no Ifalpa; a microcosm of Switzerland you could say.... that´s the way thugs like it,I would advise caution & an effort to learn from each other as efcop pointed out.Both teams could learn new things .Hope for the best anyway, & YY please lighten up the GUV likes your posts so all is not lost in the popularity stakes
Cisco Kid is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2001, 02:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: europe
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

YY... I dont know what sort of medicine you are on, but do us all a favour and go away!!!
You don't have any idea of what is going on in Switzerland I feel......
blue belly is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2001, 13:48
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: high up above
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

YY you're missing the point. I didn't say merge the two boards. I suggested the two pilot bodies be merged. there's a big difference.

Cisco, you'll find a meesage in your profile
rgds

[ 06 November 2001: Message edited by: efcop ]
efcop is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2001, 14:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: By the sea
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Ever noticed that when you lift up a rock, or any other hard, inanimate object with built-in inertia, how many creepy-crawlies go racing about in all directions when the sunlight hits them......?

Cisco, rather than wasting time pondering who I am and what I'm like, why don't you dazzle us all with your golden argument? If, as seems likely, you disagree with what I write, then counter it with some reasoned thought of your own. In fact, I challenge you to give us some examples of where Aeropers, or in fact any pilot union, has acted in good faith in support of the people they claim to represent, and not in the maintenance and expansion of their own power.

Pilot unions are, I suggest, cancerous organisations that ineviatably lead to the downfall of companies they infest. Sabena, Ansett, shortly UAL, Delta if it's not careful....the list is long and ugly.

I accept and encourage that you disagree, Cisco.
Fine, we live in a pluralist world. But lets have more clear and reasoned argument and less murky muck-raking please. Its beneath you.



[ 06 November 2001: Message edited by: YakYak ]
YakYak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.