Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

BA NAPS Pension - Revaluation Doubles Defecit

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

BA NAPS Pension - Revaluation Doubles Defecit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Oct 2006, 19:19
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA expects everybody to work longer, whether they are in NAPS or not, whether they are pilots or not. Everybodys going to be working longer due to the change to age discrimination laws. You are confusing the two subjects.
Carnage Matey! is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 22:15
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toulouse
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
potkettleblack

i am litterally the last person in the naps scheme (joined at 19 in 2002 after apprenticeship) and i am seriously worried about there being anything left by the time i retire. if the retirement age is raised to 68 then including my apprenticeship i could concieveably work for the company for 52 years and retire on a pittance.something needs to be done and soon.
bamcb38c is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 22:21
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Potkettleblack- or alternatively you will be the last man standing to take what's left in the pot and there's no telling what that might be by then!

More seriously though , if you work until 68, all the graphs say you may not have to eke out your pension for quite so long.
Skylion is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 22:27
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think you may have got the name wrong skylion!
Tandemrotor is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2006, 22:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: toulouse
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
by the looks of things if i am the last man standing i may well owe them money on my retirement. lol.
bamcb38c is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 08:03
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bamcb38c

One way of looking at it is that, if we fail to get the company to compromise on it's awful proposals, is that you still have over 40 years to sort out your retirement.

Either way I agree it is not a pleasant prospect.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 10:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very true TB time to find a proper career. Added to this list of woes is also the issue of BA being bought out because I cannot see that there is much protection if we find ourselves working for Emirates. Such things even with our present debt mountain are never beyond the realms of possibility.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 13:32
  #28 (permalink)  
30W
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HZ123,

No chance of being bought out I should think - whoever were to do so also buys the pension debt! One pensions analyst did suggest BA's best forward going business plan was to liquidate the company. Pension scheme lost, then start afresh a new company. Never would be allowed to happen of course, but has a business sense to it given the scale of the pension debt that BA faces.

After the pension legislation changes in April, Trustee boards now have to negotiate and AGREE a pension recovery plan with the employer following actuarial valuation. The Pensions Regulator has said that any recovery plan longer than 10 years, would trigger an in depth investigation of the scheme by themselves. Given the size of the blackhole, it's difficult to see that being achieved..........

General comment:-

Remember this is not only a BA pension crisis! All final salary schemes have suffered the same fate. My charter airline has committed large sums of extra money to the scheme over the next few years, and has already input a large amount. We will however suffer the same type of increase in the blackhole as BA at the next valuation for reasons stated in previous post.

Over the last 2 years, our pilot workforce has been pushed into nearly 50% increased contributions by members. Although scheme NRD is 60, you could go at 55 without penalty (only using pensionable servic figures to 55 of course). This was taken away, and now early retirement takes a penalty of 6%/yr from your pension. So, go at 55, and be offered pension rights to 55 minus 30%!

All this was consulted on through BALPA at New Road! BALPA told us the pension problem was everyones problem, and for things to work we ALL had to recognise pensions, life expectancy, etc had changed. The changes were implemented with BALPA doing 'roadshows' alongside the company to recommend the change!

I do find it pretty disgusting, that now it's BA, suggestions of increased members contributions, extended working are all so totally unacceptable. When other parts of the industry were looking for support was it available - were BA pilots interested as long as they were ok? I think you already know the answers...............

Sorry, but for those of us who alreday have had their pension conditions changed with BALPA's support aren't going to be lending weight to BA keeping all theirs

Good luck though!

30W
30W is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 14:14
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although there is a risk to the fund that folk will live longer than previous generations, it is by no means a certainty. Ask any Russian, who knows that life expectancy has fallen rapidly in the last two generations. What about bird flu, obesity, diabetes, MRSA, war, revolution and a host of other surprises that could alter the projections overnight.
So, no need to rush an agreement, it will be 80 years before the last NAPS pensioner is dead. The tide could easily turn. Any agreement needs the flexibility to revert back to the present generous benefits.
fiftyfour is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2006, 15:13
  #30 (permalink)  
30W
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are LOTS of assumptions within the actuarial valuation, life expectancy being only one of them. The assumptions all have to be agreed with the Trustee Board. I did 18 months ago ask BALPA to try and produce some accurate data on life expectancy of pilots post retirement. Is it same as national averages or less? (effect of increased radiation/body clock changes etc). If accurate data was available relating to the majority of a schemes members, then the valuation would be justified in using that data in it's assumptions. Sadly, no data has been produced. Till then, since Trustees are legally charged with acting 'prudently', it is only reasonable that the most up to date longeveity tables are used from within the pensions/insurance industry.

Since the scheme is a 'closed' scheme, it is doubtful BA will keep it to it's bitter end (last pensioner dies). More likely, when membership numbers reach a certain level it will be sold off to an insurance company.

If in years to come the scheme is not in debt, rest assured getting generous terms for employees will be a huge if not impossible battle. More likely the principal employer, BA in this case, will take a pension holiday based on the huge sums it has invested to get the scheme 'healthy' again.

30w
30W is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2006, 22:15
  #31 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA Naps pension

2.1 billion deficit.if this is the real figure,what are the options for the future?
bermudatriangle is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2006, 22:29
  #32 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One option is to pay it off, exactly as Lufthansa did and get on with the business of being an airline.

BA have the cash (yes, cash!!) to do it and have been paying off debt at the rate of £1.2 billion per year for the past five years whilst still making a profit. Why should a pension debt be any different? It is deferred pay after all.

See the 11 pages of BA pilots 'prepared to strike' thread on R & N.
Human Factor is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 01:28
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
I am willing to lay a friendly wager ....... that BA will NOT pay the deficit in full ..... nothing like full. It will only pay something like a third to a quarter.

If I am wrong it will be a pleasant surprise. Nevertheless, I don't think I am going to be surprised!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 02:01
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry excuse for a government

Don't worry chaps because if this sorry excuse for a government remains in power much longer the only folks with any money will be the ne'er do wells. Mister Brown, being the son of a very frugally minded Scottish Minister of Religion wants to give ALL your money away to the huge underclass he has produced as a result of his governments policies.
More handouts for the young single parents of 13 or 14 so they and their uneducated scroat boyfriends can have at least 4 children before they themselves reach the age of majority ie 21.
More handouts for the richly deserving immigrants who will be provided with ALL the necessities of life without so much as paying a penny in taxes.
More handouts to foreign criminals to encourage them to 'go home' only for them to use a small portion of that handout to buy a return ticket to Never Never Land (was called UK)
So don't worry about pension shortfalls - just think in terms of shortfall FULL STOP!
MercenaryAli is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2006, 03:06
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 2 Effing Close
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a 1 year gap between post 5 & 6 on this thread and the deficit grew from £928 million to £2.1 billion. I just hope they sort it out soon for the sake of all the staff.
Tess Tickelss is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2006, 15:39
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An ongoing topic...so what is the latest position ?
bermudatriangle is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.