Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Speed cushions - press enquiry / Car parking LGW

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Speed cushions - press enquiry / Car parking LGW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Nov 2004, 14:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sussex
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Lgw Car Parking

35 minutes today from Car Park X to Concorde House!
How about all BAA staff being put in X and let the people who actually do something useful get to their work.
Or maybe the CAA should add half an hour on each end of the duty day to account for the time you are still on the airport.
Masai is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 15:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe the coach drivers were 'driving to rule' in protest at the speed bumps to the car park.
View From The Ground is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 15:55
  #3 (permalink)  
Just a numbered other
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 1,169
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

For LGW, read just about any other airport in the country.

9 to 5 shiny arses in the best car parks, shift working front line revenue earners a bus ride away
Arkroyal is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 17:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it is a protest about the speed humps then they have my full support its bad enough riding the bus twice a day I shudder to think what it must be like to drive the bus all day.

This traffic calming actualy directs traffic head on and has to be the most utterly stupid thing that I have ever seen.

The problem is that the half witt who ordered the instalation of these so called speed cushons can't find a way to undo this mistake and save face.

The bottom line is it was a stupid idea to put the the things in and having proved this BAA managers utter stupidity all keeping the things is proving to the users of this car park that the BAA managment is to stupid to learn from its mistakes !.
A and C is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 18:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bedfordshire
Age: 43
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arkroyal,

"9 to 5 shiny arses in the best car parks, shift working front line revenue earners a bus ride away"

Where are the best car parks then? If you're talking Car Park H for South Term then you will find "front line revenue earners" from Servisair, Groundstar and BAA as well a lot of shop workers from the Terminal.

I'm a 9-5 shiny "arse" however my first year was in Car Park X so its not an automatic allocation. I know a lot of other "arses" who are still down there. I know what you're on about though, the bus ride is a chore and the speed bumps are no help but I think you'll find theres a fair mix of workers in the nearer car parks.

Besides, there is still space in H as far as I know, try asking...

No comment is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 19:10
  #6 (permalink)  
MAX
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Right Here.
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did ask. No cigar.

So i have the disc but use public transport. Its quicker.

MAX
MAX is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 19:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Each company has an allocation, I believe, of spaces (in for example car park H).

Some companies use their full allocation and some don't. You will just have to put your name down on your companies waiting list for the better car-parks.
Cuillin is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 19:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Beautiful South
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone have the e-mail address of the half wit whose responsibility covers the dangerous bumps....( refuse to call them traffic calming because all they do is direct traffic into the middle of the road ) ???
cirrus01 is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 20:48
  #9 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The Relevant department for complaints is, wait for it, wait for it,

First and Last Impressions
Room 556
South Roof Office Block
Gatwick Airport Limited
London Gatwick Airport
West Sussex
RH6 0NP

General Manager, Ms. Louise Ash.

I wrote a letter of complaint which was answered with the predictable reply that the humps are industry standard and if people drove at the recommended speed there would be no problem.

I replied pointing out a few relevant points. That letter has been ignored.

If a few more people wrote and complained instead of moaning to anybody that will listen we might get somewhere.

No e-mail address listed, besides e-mails are too easy to ignore.

Last edited by M.Mouse; 16th Nov 2004 at 21:04.
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 22:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: outstanding in the field
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

The object of these some 54 bumps on the X car park road have been the subject of many campaigns by groups at the Airport and the IPA (Independent Pilots Association). Please, everyone, keep writing Ms Ash telling her what a BAD first and last impression the drive to/from work is at present. Tell her that you will hold BAA financially responsible for any car suspension damage and CRIMINALLY responsible if you are involved in an injury either as a driver or as a bus passenger.
Also...drive at the 13.7 mph alll the way down to X as this is the speed the bumps are designed to produce (her words from a letter I recieved from her). This will play havoc with the bus schedules but maybe she will get off her "shiny" ARSE and do something before someone is KILLED!!!!!!


Moderators...please put back in the news section as this is a current relevant topic..ta
Fly_Right is offline  
Old 16th Nov 2004, 22:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 'An Airfield Somewhere in England'
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I also wrote to Ms Ash - and I also got the standard letter which was frankly useless. Anyone who uses Car Park X will know that it is universal practice for nearly all users to drive straight down the middle of the road to save their cars. Sooner or later there will be a head-on collision and then these pathetic speed bumps will go. What a shame we have to wait for a fatality to bring about a change. My journey to and from 'X' is without a doubt the worst part of my entire day.
Norman Stanley Fletcher is offline  
Old 17th Nov 2004, 06:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flech

You are quite correct in in thinking that it will take a death to get the BAA to move on this issue after all if someone is driving along the middle of the road how can the BAA be at fault ?.

The attitude of the BAA is that they don't give a damm if someone is killed as long as there leagal department covers the BAA's back.

The fact is that by now the BAA must know what a collision risk they have set up with these speed bumps and it is not an issue for them as the legal people see they have no liability.

I don't think I have ever seen a large public company that puts such a low value on human life just so some manager can save face for the stupid decision to install these things in the first place.
A and C is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2004, 03:08
  #13 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 84
Posts: 3,270
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
You can put me down for a vote or two against speed bumps. But at least imagine it could be worse...you could live by one. The bewildering mindless lack of awareness is only exceeded by the ‘planner's' selfishness. ‘We'll do it this way, sod the people who's spines we crunch, and those that have to listen to thump thump all day long'

I suggest that it won't be long before there is serious litigation re the installation of these strips. A driver who spends much of his day being shaken in this way, is going to have a back problem. I mean ‘is going to' in the same way that someone who uses a computer mouse–is going to get RSI–when they know they could just be awarded silly sums of money.
Loose rivets is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2004, 15:59
  #14 (permalink)  
DIY
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGW car parking

I have taken the time and trouble to write to the said Ms Ash three times now on the subject of those dreadful speedhumps and the time it now takes to find a space in Xray and return to Concorde House.Todate I have had not one single acknowledgement let alone the courtesy of a reply from her or anyone in her department. Sums up her attitude I suppose.

Last edited by DIY; 18th Nov 2004 at 16:11.
DIY is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 06:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: gatwick
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've called and written numerous times and have had no response. I suggest we keep pestering her. Tell your colleagues to do the same!
srjumbo is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2004, 09:34
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For what it's worth, here's the standard reply:


''Speed Cushions on Perimeter Road South

Thank you for contacting us concerning Perimeter Road South. Health and Safety is paramount at Gatwick Airport and no doubt you are aware that there have been numerous traffic incidents in this area due to speeding drivers. Traffic calming measures were implemented in June 20011 which consisted of a kerb built out and thermoplastic rumble strips. Regrettably, drivers ignored these measures and continued to speed causing further traffic incidents. It was therefore necessary for us to employ a professional consultants to undertake a risk assessment and find a solution that would 'force' drivers to slow down .

The conclusion of this assessment has been the speed cushions. Set at an industry standard of 75mm height with minimum gaps of BOm, it is estimated that drivers will be forced to reduce to 13.7mph. The height and amount used are completely necessary to ensure that drivers reduce speed and do not accelerate significantly after driving over the speed cushions.

We appreciate your comments and concerns regarding the new traffic calming measures, and do assure you that it has been completely necessary to install them. If drivers adhere to the road conditions, slow down and drive safely over them then no adverse damage will occur to the vehicle.

We will continue to monitor the area and answer any questions that you may have. I would like to thank you for making us aware of your concerns and assure you that health and safety remains our number one priority.''

Yours gloomily,
mcdhu
mcdhu is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2004, 14:05
  #17 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Having endured this appalling BAA contrived obstacle course several times in the last few weeks does anybody have any suggestions how a campaign could be started to embarrass the BAA into removing the speed bumps?
M.Mouse is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2004, 15:40
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Crawley
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speed cushions - press enquiry

I'm looking into writing an article on the speed cushions on the Perimeter Road South. Please contact me if this issue affects you, and if you're willing to have your name printed.

Many thanks,

Amy Anderson
Reporter
Crawley Observer
01293 562929
amyander is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2004, 15:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Mycenae
Posts: 506
Received 14 Likes on 7 Posts
Every member of staff who rides the buses from X call in sick claiming spinal compression fractures?

The North Terminal coaches are the worst, they block off the fold down seats forcing people to sit over the rear axle seats, which happen to be the ones that absorb most of the speed cushions impact at 30mph.
StudentInDebt is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2004, 16:47
  #20 (permalink)  
Couldonlyaffordafiver
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: The Twilight Zone near 30W
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....drivers will be forced to reduce to 13.7mph.
Call me picky if you like but isn't the speed limit 30mph, not 13.7mph?

The only time anyone has been killed/injured on that road was after traffic calming was installed (those ridiculous concrete tank traps, which at least one person drove into and wrote the car off). As everyone drove along there at 40mph before, surely the sensible answer would have been to raise the speed limit to 40mph. I don't think I've ever seen a pedestrian along there and the bus stops are big enough to see and avoid.

In the meantime, until this politically correct imbecile is fired, if you can afford it buy a Range Rover with air suspension. I've been reliably informed you can do 40mph down that road without noticing the humps.
Human Factor is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.