![]() |
Nothing to do with the frequency of operation then?
|
AP3340 again.
Radar altimeter - operates on a pulse system, measures height over a range in the order of 1,000 to 50,000 feet. Error in the absolute measurement is within +-100 feet, but changes of height at a constant level are measurable to within about +-30 feet. Radio altimeter - operates on frequency modulation and covers the range from zero to about 5,000 feet. Error is proportional to height and may amount to +-3%. However the AP dates from 1960 and todays manufacturers seem to use the terms radar and radio interchangeably. |
Here's a remark from a web site which I daren't mention here. :hmm:
The radio altimeter is often erroneously described as a "radar altimeter". In fact it doesn't use radar principles beyond the fact that it responds to reflected signals. Conclusion, just call it a RadAlt and everyone's happy. |
Greetings from Mr Pedant
Every other ‘Radar’, Search, Fighter or Weather, needs to detect the direction and range of a target which may, or may not, be there. NOTHING to do with the OP question, but hey, who cares! |
- not true - a basic ranging radar produces only range, not direction. OK. Very Old AI. |
Gunsight ranging? Cue Pantomime mode "It's in front of you.........".......... "Oh no it isn't"
|
forget:
So what's the point? Range without direction? You know it's there - but you don't know where? You happen to have an example of this? |
|
oh dear - not 'AI', please
|
One "feature" of a radio altimeter is that it sends out a range only, no azimuth (think a near hemisphere below the plane). In theory, one could fly down the middle of a deep, but narrow, canyon and have a radalt of, say, 300' from the canyon wall, not the floor. Since nearly always the radio signal intercepts the ground first, not a problem, but this does solve low altitude bank angles.
GF |
F-100 Super Sabre optical gunsight.
The ranging radar had a fixed antenna. http://www.f-100.info/images/cutshal...0f_fpanel1.jpg |
BOAC, What's wrong with AI? The stuff inside the sharpish end of the Hunter was always called that.
Page 17. Hawker Hunter 1951 to 2007 By David J. Griffin. 'The change of role to Ground Attack did not require the retention of the ranging radar, equipment meant for airborne aircraft intercept'. aka AI. Hawker Hunter 1951 to 2007 - Google Books |
Didn't know there were TWO Hun Drivers, here!
GF |
Gosh! We have wandered a long way from RadAlts!
The stuff inside the sharpish end of the Hunter was always called that. Apart from some ex Navy two-seaters (T8?), Hunters, as far as I know (and no doubt John Farley will correct me) never had intercept radar fitted and were vectored into visual range on its targets by ground control. The exception was, I understand, a 'one-off' conversion to train naval Sea Harrier pilots in AI use. |
The radio altimeter is often erroneously described as a "radar altimeter". In fact it doesn't use radar principles beyond the fact that it responds to reflected signals. http://search.honeywell.com/search?p...meter&x=7&y=10 FreeFlight Systems Radar Altimeters and Indicators The manual of the aircraft I flew describes it as a radio altimeter. Depending on the particular piece of kit fitted it operates "to send a signal to the ground, receive an echo, and measure the phase or time difference between the transmitted and received signals. In the pulse system the time may be measured, and in the continuous wave systems the phase is measured". Pedant off. (Sorry BOAC and forget) |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:58. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.