PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   B-777 vs A-330 (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/387940-b-777-vs-330-a.html)

beachbumflyer 6th September 2009 22:23

B-777 vs A-330
 
Hi guys,
I would like to know how the B-777 compares to the A-330.

Rainboe 6th September 2009 22:33

Why? They aren't similar. The A330 is more a competitor to the 767-300. What sort of comparison are you after?

MU3001A 6th September 2009 22:34

More space and a pull out tray for your laptop in the A330 cockpit.

Toowoomba Taipan 7th September 2009 02:35

for cheap operations and frugal fuel consumption.........a330
for long haul etops and nice handling............b777

a330 hardware sucks, software is overengineered and possible human interphase issues.

b777 superior hardware and redundant systems for etops. software less engineered but vastly superior maintenance computer making online maintenance a breeze. autoflight and flight management systems not so fancy but instinctive to use.

flyboyike 7th September 2009 13:51

I, on the other hand, would like to know how the An-2 compares to the Nordyun Norseman.

Many thanks.

Rainboe 7th September 2009 15:59

The AN-2 didn't rub out Glenn Miller, but they did both have a single engine. I want to know, and I want to know NOW, how a 757 compares to a BAC 1-11 500!

WindSheer 7th September 2009 17:24

Rainboe is bang on.

The 340 is the competitor to the 777....even though its got 4 kebabs!

PantLoad 11th September 2009 03:23

A similar comparison....
 
An analogous comparison would be the B-757 vs. the A-321. Never flew the 757, but, talking to those who have flown both aircraft, the common
response: no comparison. But, Airbus says otherwise.

With regard to the line maintenance subject, I have no experience with the B-777, but I can tell you the Airbus is very easy to maintain on the line. Granted, the Bus breaks a lot, but, if you have the replacement
"boxes", it, in most cases, takes longer to fill out the paperwork for the repair than for the repair itself.

And, the line machanics don't have to have a whole lot of system knowledge to fix it. The CFDS BITE system pretty much spells out the problem for you. All that is left to do is "plug 'n play".....remove one box,
and replace it with another. Doesn't get much easier than that.

Fly safe,


PantLoad

leewan 11th September 2009 10:58

The 744 allows you to do limited line tests from the CMC and gives you instructions to do simple line tests similiar to the Airbus CMDU. The A380 has a dedicated onboard maintenance area in the cockpit where you can access the whole AMM. The system hyperlinks you with the relevant AMM page alongside the fault.

TURIN 11th September 2009 21:32


With regard to the line maintenance subject, I have no experience with the B-777, but I can tell you the Airbus is very easy to maintain on the line.
Now that is funny. :D:D:D

g21agoose 11th September 2009 21:43

I would like to know the difference between my ex- wife and a B744- MTOW, range etc. And is my ex Cat III capable?

leewan 12th September 2009 07:52


I would like to know the difference between my ex- wife and a B744
Well, is she a BIG TOP or a MEGA TOP ?

Rainboe 12th September 2009 08:25

Well I think the answer is one is incredibly expensive (it costs millions), very heavy, it makes an amazing noise constantly waking people and goes on like forever and ever, and the other is an aeroplane.

Denti 12th September 2009 10:22

Now that is the first really relevant comparison in this thread :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:29.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.