Not true A and C. Happened to me the other day, it is currently in the hands of our Fleet Office who are going to speak to CMF ATC to find out what the cunning plan is.:ok:

PP

Edited to add

BOAC, wasn't you who had the unscheduled night-stop when the steps hit the leading edge on one of your 757s on Saturday was it?

With a good understanding of the obstacles, there's little doubt that a turn to sea is better. But I think the PAN-OPS principle still works -- there should be plenty of room for a right 270 degree turn at the circling MDA from any point right downwind.

The general principle is that the protected area is a circle(-ish) centred on the airport, thus turning towards the centre of that protected area is usually better than turning towards its edge.

PP - no, me humble 737 driver, but I saw the (T/Edge) damage yesterday. Quite a gouge. Iron Maiden not best pleased.......................waiting for the new release "You broke my ship".

Actually the pax and crew were 'rescued' I think that night by another 757, so no snails and garlic for them.

We discovered that nothing larger than a Sprinter van can be driven through France on a Sunday which made getting a new aileron there a challenge.:)

Regarding LPMA, my brief (should I find myself up that street) is a turn left to join the VOR 05 g/a track UNTIL I am into the bay on final when I would (obviously) continue right.

CMF circling g/a is, to my mind, not a 'problem' as the turn is always towards the airfield which is in relatively 'safe' terrain, and awareness of your pos based on the CH is a good backup.

When you are downwind at LPMA for runway 05 you follow the missed approach until the missed approach point (downwind). After that point you have to decide how you are going to establish on that missed approach, probably with a left turn before the end of downwind and once you have started the turn towards GELO you need to keep the right turn going all the way around to intercept the missed approach course to FUSUL.

So it still follows the rule of following the missed approach for the instrument procedure you flew, just once again requiring a bit of thought as to how you are going to position the aircraft to safely establish onto this missed approach procedure.

PP

Edit

Crossing posts here I think! BOAC, yes of course it was trailing edge, I remember seeing the steps now and they were behind the wing. Bloody tall set of steps though, more like the ones engineers would use to reach the top of the wing, not sure what they were using them for, perhaps looking for de-ice requirements? Glad they got back home (I guess the crew probably would have preferred the chance of some French cuisine though)!

Pete
 

It is the first time I have been toldabout this and I think that it must be a mistake by ATC. please let us know what the outcome of the inquirey is.

I don't want to find myself head to head with another aircraft when doing a GA between the hills!!

Apart from northerly winds, the circle onto 36 will be used when 36 is used for departure. In these cases the approach will normally be 'sanitised' for the departure. It will be a less common event that there will be a conflict betweeen circling g/a's and 18 ILS's. Still a possibility, though, and I too am interested PP in the reply to your company.

I would have thought that. in view of the procedure track, there was time in the event of a g/a from the 18 ILS to clear the approach?

BOAC

I assume you mean apart from southerly winds?

I am familiar with the departure whilst one a/c circles onto 36. My point is when flying the ILS to land on 18 and having another a/c coming down the approach behind you. During the day they will expect you to G/A into a downwind left hand visual pattern for another approach to RWY18. At night I can only assume they were expecting the same! Don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't be doing that in the dark!

The problem is an engine failure. If that is the reason for your G/A I suspect it could be very interesting flying the missed approach and trying to out climb someone coming down the approach!!!!:\

PP

A and C.

I have no future.
I have applied to security at LGW though. Looking forward to a cheeky squeeze in the near future. Say Hi to the clock weights.

No - I think I meant northerly ie you cannot land 18.

- that procedure is not in my current book nor in BA's book. I would be interested to know how you plan to circle below circling height as well?:confused:

BOAC

I read your comment as 'apart from when the wind is northerly, the circle onto 36 will be used'!!!:rolleyes: I see what you mean now.

What, are you saying that you cannot do a G/A into a visual circuit? Are you saying that if you went around when visual you would ALWAYS have to fly a full instrument missed approach procedure or take radar vectors to have another go?:confused: I am only talking about a visual circuit, just like you did to get your type rating!!! Our CMF brief mentions that CMF ATC may expect this if you go around off runway 18, obviously only if you can stay below cloud! My point was that they had somebody coming down the ILS behind me (about 4 miles), at night, so I can only assume that they would expect me to go into a visual left hand pattern if I went around (but not something I would consider in the dark, hence my earlier comment that I have put it back into my Fleet Office's hands). We are not permitted to do night visual circuits in my company, only descend to MSA, then get within the defined circling area when we may descend to circling minima and perform a circling manoeuvre to land. The scenario I mention does not fit this criteria as we would not be starting off above circling minima necessarily.

PP

- we are straying somewhat from the original question, but I took your words to imply that this was the 'expected procedure'. I would probably be happy to do it at night providing I am at or above c min and I have the necessary visual references IF the need arose - but when will it? As I said, neither BA nor current mention it. I am now getting quite confused with your company 'SOP' - surely flying a LH visual off 18 and then having to break it off downwind with another a/c on the approach is yet another self-made disaster waiting to happen? What are you going to do? I think I'll stick with the published g/a!

I will ask the company if they would consider including this procedure in the sim check (which includes circle 36) as 'expected procedure' and I think I know the answer! Do you practice this circuit in the sim? In view of your post, why would you not conduct a circle to land onto 18 at night at circling minima?

The g/a for engine failure you talk of - are you saying your SOP is to fly a visual circuit? :eek: If not, there is plenty of time for ATC to break off the inbound and send it around; there would be no conflict. I.E. No one to 'outclimb'.

Remember, the circling approach that you practice in the simulator is just that, each simulator is certified for a particular circling approach and it doesn't mean that is the standard to apply in the real world.

In the real world circling approaches that I have done it was done in a non radar environment with others holding until you landed.

If the weather was a factor on your approach then we would request a straight out departure if feasible from ATC in the event of a missed approach.

But if you don't request it then you must circle back towards the instrument runway and fly that procedure which could be a handful on a A320 especially since you activated the secondary and now have NO MISSED APPROACH PROCEDURE in the box, woohooooo, good luck. Smart money pilots only activate the secondary when on short final:)

BOAC

We have been briefed that CMF ATC may well 'expect' you to turn left into the visual circuit in the event of a go around on rwy 18. Suffice to say we have a procedure to go around off an approach to rwy18 into a visual circuit. You don't. Yes we do practice it in the sim.

Just be aware that if you go around off rwy18 there may well be someone coming down the ILS behind you and that needs some consideration, especially at night and/or in cloud. I am not happy with that and hence my call to our Fleet Office.

Never said I wouldn't, you have misinterpreted a visual circuit (from below circling minima) for a circling manoeuvre (started from at/above circling minima).

No.

I think I will leave it there as we are straying well off topic now.

PP