PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Pilotless A/C (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/205838-pilotless-c.html)

chornedsnorkack 19th January 2006 14:49


Originally Posted by Bombay Bad Boy
RJM - Ha ha very funny. Some of us are actually learning things from this thread! Aircraft/Pilot/UAV limitations etc There are similiar questions being addressed in the ATC world right now!
.
.
I have a further question:- If the FMS was programmed from the holding facility to make a an approach at an airfield, how would it cope with changing from FL to Alt on the altitimeter?
BBB

How does the Ground Proximity Warning System know the real distance to the terrain?

GPWS and TCAS are things which pilots are supposed to obey without thinking... wasn´t there a rule that a pilot must obey TCAS even if the ATC is ordering otherwise? Shouldn´t there be a direct connection between TCAS and GPWS with autopilot in that case? Subject to perhaps pilot alerts and possibility of manual overrule - what would you do if your TCAS is ordering climb and the other plane presumably is receiving orders to descend, but what the other pilot does not know is that you have a stall warning, too, against climbing?

David_Lid Air 19th January 2006 14:51

Oh and by the way.. Why does so many non-pilot enthusiasts seem to think that pilots do almost nothing in their working days? as i said some discussions on forums make me a little upset because on some people it sounds like everybody can fly if they play flightsim..

I work very hard to make flying as my profession and its not that funny to get close to no respect for what i am doing

El-Dog 19th January 2006 15:01

Actually UAVs don't take the pilot out of the system - just out of the cockpit - there still a need for a "pilot" on the ground - just doesn't need flying pay and perks!!

chornedsnorkack 20th January 2006 08:57


Originally Posted by El-Dog
Actually UAVs don't take the pilot out of the system - just out of the cockpit - there still a need for a "pilot" on the ground - just doesn't need flying pay and perks!!

Well, it is not just pay.

In the cockpit, there is very restricted space and weight. You cannot have huge radars mounted on a commercial aircraft, nor radars in several distant positions. A pilot on the ground might easily afford such navigational aids, as well as other luxuries of not paying for space and weight, like having several pilots and flight engineers in a roomy tower, available to assist with a plane in critical phases of flight and otherwise engaging themselves with supervising planes which are, say, cruising or holding.

So, landing is certainly a stressful phase of flight. Would a pilot like to be able to share cockpit tasks on approach with pilot/s sitting in the airport tower, capable of getting the airplane attitude data from ground instruments as well as the plane-based ones, and giving pilot input to the plane controls?

David_Lid Air 20th January 2006 09:44

I am glad that i´m not alive when these planes come to life because it sounds very very awkward to me that no pilot is up there, and i do not want to sit in a tower steering remote controlled A/C, how fun is that? i must say that if this did happen under my lifetime then my interest in aviation would die :{


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:11.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.