PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Port & Starboard versus Left and Right (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/650159-port-starboard-versus-left-right.html)

ORAC 10th Dec 2022 20:16

In RAF AD up to about 2000 port and starboard were used for commands and left and right for target information.

e.g. “ as I have target 35 left heading 270, starboard 090 for 180 displaced left”.

The reason being that, during comms jamming, the pilots could differentiate between orders and instructions.

The USA and others only used Left and Right so, as we increasingly operated in combined Ops we followed their terminology.

The RN of course favoured the use of green and red for clearing approaches and overflights - resulting in the apocryphal RAF question, “ is that from the sharp end or the blunt end?”….

helispotter 11th Dec 2022 06:49

Good to read more about where some of the conventions have come from.

Given the discussion on Britten-Norman aircraft, I looked up the company history on Wikipedia, and this includes:
"During the 1960s, Britten-Norman were involved in the development of hovercraft via their subsidiary Cushioncraft Ltd;[6] their first craft, the CC1, was the world's second hovercraft".

So nautical connections seem to encourage use of Port and Starboard for aircraft.

In the meantime, I have also remembered at least one place where use of Port & Starboard is common (and why I wasn't dreaming this!): Those perspective cutaway drawings of aircraft that regularly turned up in 'Air International' and aircraft encyclopedias have many parts labelled as either port or starboard. At least two companies produced such drawings: Aviagraphica and WEAL (John Weal?) and all those I have looked at from both these illustrators use port and starboard for items such as navigation lights, undercarriage, wing components, engines, fuel tanks, air brakes, etc, etc. I am not sure where those illustrators were/are based.

dixi188 11th Dec 2022 08:06


Originally Posted by tdracer (Post 11345622)
That's actually an interesting question. Since the early B-36s didn't have the jets, I'm guessing the prop engines were 1-6, and when the jets got added they were 7-8 on the left and 9-10 on the right.
But that's just an educated guess - does anyone know for sure?

I've just looked in the book, "Magnesium Overcast", and the photo's of the cockpit show the recip throttles on the centre console as 1 thru 6 and the jet throttles on the roof panel as 1 thru 4.
Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them.
Dixi.

helispotter 11th Dec 2022 10:32


Originally Posted by dixi188 (Post 11345877)
...Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them.
Dixi.

Been a while since I saw it on TV, so tool a look on www:


The calls are consistent on the numbering: At 1:23 he calls for prop engine start as 4,5,6, then 3,2,1 and at 3:18, on reaching runway, jet start is called as 1,2,3,4.

Three Lima Charlie 11th Dec 2022 14:16

Which brings us to the term P.O.S.H. as used by P & O Steamship Company for the route to/from India. The best cabins onboard were Port Out and Starboard Home.

Check Airman 11th Dec 2022 14:20

Next time I’m told to turn 20 degrees left, I’ll reply with “aye aye, coming 20 degrees to port”
:}

DaveReidUK 11th Dec 2022 15:40


Originally Posted by Three Lima Charlie (Post 11346031)
Which brings us to the term P.O.S.H. as used by P & O Steamship Company for the route to/from India. The best cabins onboard were Port Out and Starboard Home.

See here for a fairly comprehensive debunking of that theory by Snopes.

punkalouver 11th Dec 2022 20:17


Originally Posted by helispotter (Post 11345943)
Been a while since I saw it on TV, so tool a look on www:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FJVxtTNjJk

The calls are consistent on the numbering: At 1:23 he calls for prop engine start as 4,5,6, then 3,2,1 and at 3:18, on reaching runway, jet start is called as 1,2,3,4.

On four engine types, the checkride seems to always end up with two out on the same side. I wonder if the B-36 checkride had five out on one side.

India Four Two 12th Dec 2022 02:38


Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them.
Back in the day when Colonel Potter (Harry Morgan) was a USAF Flight Engineer!


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....24458b81d8.png
​​​​​​​


India Four Two 12th Dec 2022 02:44

In my UAS days in the late 60s, Port and Starboard were used for formation changes, but I seem to remember that GCA/PAR controllers used Left and Right.

I remember one of my friends wrote Port and Starboard on his white leather flying gloves!

Speaking of flying gloves, why did the RAF persist in using white gloves? They were particularly unsuitable for preflighting a Gipsy Major-powered aircraft! I think I went through a pair a year. Nowadays I have a pair of black USAF Nomex gloves. Much more practical.

Bosi72 12th Dec 2022 09:26

Leftists=Red Communists=Red Porto
:)

John Eacott 12th Dec 2022 21:48


Originally Posted by India Four Two (Post 11346264)
I remember one of my friends wrote Port and Starboard on his white leather flying gloves!

Speaking of flying gloves, why did the RAF persist in using white gloves? They were particularly unsuitable for preflighting a Gipsy Major-powered aircraft! I think I went through a pair a year. Nowadays I have a pair of black USAF Nomex gloves. Much more practical.

Many are the aviators who labelled their flying gloves, almost as a badge of pride!

I always assumed the white cape leather was there to make hand signals more obvious; green was introduced for some years but I believe white is available these days? All brands of UK Mil, not just the RAF :ok:

On an aside, relating to being visible, when we trialed the then-new green LSJs the first thing we noticed when strapped in was that we could see the instruments without the usual yellow reflections we were used to from the old jackets. Similarly, in FJ vs Wessex intercept trials the glaring aiming point for all jet jockeys was the pilot's white helmet; but many, many years passed before the helmets were changed to green.

reefrat 12th Dec 2022 23:59


Originally Posted by angry ant (Post 11342891)
There is no, RED PORT LEFT, in the bottle. QED.

No red port left in the Barrel. is the classic rhyme , this reminds that the port hand top mark is round reflecting its origin as a barrel

MechEngr 13th Dec 2022 01:01


Originally Posted by Mogwi (Post 11345480)

That's just to get them on the correct hands. Damn uncomfortable about half the time otherwise.

Uplinker 18th Dec 2022 07:40

The point of specifying 1, 2 etc, for engines is that they are numbered in increasing order from port to starboard as if you were reading a book, where the text goes from left to right across the page.

As well as this, the same convention works for identifying wheels, tyres, brake packs, on multi-wheeled aircraft and of course on aircraft with more than two engines.

jolihokistix 18th Dec 2022 09:06

Books I read here go from right to left… :8

(But we do drive on the right (left) side of the road.)

Uplinker 18th Dec 2022 09:35

I knew someone would bring that up ! :)

India Four Two 18th Dec 2022 12:38


I always assumed the white cape leather was there to make hand signals more obvious;
I hadn’t thought of that. It makes sense. Even more reason not to wear them doing pre-flights. :)​​​​​​​

DaveReidUK 18th Dec 2022 13:11


Originally Posted by Uplinker (Post 11350100)
The point of specifying 1, 2 etc, for engines is that they are numbered in increasing order from port to starboard as if you were reading a book, where the text goes from left to right across the page.

Which engine was No 1 on the EE Lightning (the upper or the lower) ? :O

treadigraph 18th Dec 2022 16:31


Originally Posted by EXDAC (Post 11343258)
I have never flown, or been in, a BN2 but I confirmed they do use port and starboard as descriptors:

https://britten-norman.com/app/uploa...Islander-1.pdf

Some references seem to suggest that left, aft, and right were the descriptors used for Trilander engines.

John Britten and Desmond Norman were very keen yachtsmen, might explain a preference for nautical nomenclature! ;)

Ooops, see somebody else made that observation!


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:42.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.