In RAF AD up to about 2000 port and starboard were used for commands and left and right for target information.
e.g. “ as I have target 35 left heading 270, starboard 090 for 180 displaced left”. The reason being that, during comms jamming, the pilots could differentiate between orders and instructions. The USA and others only used Left and Right so, as we increasingly operated in combined Ops we followed their terminology. The RN of course favoured the use of green and red for clearing approaches and overflights - resulting in the apocryphal RAF question, “ is that from the sharp end or the blunt end?”…. |
Good to read more about where some of the conventions have come from.
Given the discussion on Britten-Norman aircraft, I looked up the company history on Wikipedia, and this includes: "During the 1960s, Britten-Norman were involved in the development of hovercraft via their subsidiary Cushioncraft Ltd;[6] their first craft, the CC1, was the world's second hovercraft". So nautical connections seem to encourage use of Port and Starboard for aircraft. In the meantime, I have also remembered at least one place where use of Port & Starboard is common (and why I wasn't dreaming this!): Those perspective cutaway drawings of aircraft that regularly turned up in 'Air International' and aircraft encyclopedias have many parts labelled as either port or starboard. At least two companies produced such drawings: Aviagraphica and WEAL (John Weal?) and all those I have looked at from both these illustrators use port and starboard for items such as navigation lights, undercarriage, wing components, engines, fuel tanks, air brakes, etc, etc. I am not sure where those illustrators were/are based. |
Originally Posted by tdracer
(Post 11345622)
That's actually an interesting question. Since the early B-36s didn't have the jets, I'm guessing the prop engines were 1-6, and when the jets got added they were 7-8 on the left and 9-10 on the right.
But that's just an educated guess - does anyone know for sure? Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them. Dixi. |
Originally Posted by dixi188
(Post 11345877)
...Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them.
Dixi. The calls are consistent on the numbering: At 1:23 he calls for prop engine start as 4,5,6, then 3,2,1 and at 3:18, on reaching runway, jet start is called as 1,2,3,4. |
Which brings us to the term P.O.S.H. as used by P & O Steamship Company for the route to/from India. The best cabins onboard were Port Out and Starboard Home.
|
Next time I’m told to turn 20 degrees left, I’ll reply with “aye aye, coming 20 degrees to port”
:} |
Originally Posted by Three Lima Charlie
(Post 11346031)
Which brings us to the term P.O.S.H. as used by P & O Steamship Company for the route to/from India. The best cabins onboard were Port Out and Starboard Home.
|
Originally Posted by helispotter
(Post 11345943)
Been a while since I saw it on TV, so tool a look on www:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FJVxtTNjJk The calls are consistent on the numbering: At 1:23 he calls for prop engine start as 4,5,6, then 3,2,1 and at 3:18, on reaching runway, jet start is called as 1,2,3,4. |
Need to watch "Strategic Air Command" again to see what James Stewart calls them. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....24458b81d8.png |
In my UAS days in the late 60s, Port and Starboard were used for formation changes, but I seem to remember that GCA/PAR controllers used Left and Right.
I remember one of my friends wrote Port and Starboard on his white leather flying gloves! Speaking of flying gloves, why did the RAF persist in using white gloves? They were particularly unsuitable for preflighting a Gipsy Major-powered aircraft! I think I went through a pair a year. Nowadays I have a pair of black USAF Nomex gloves. Much more practical. |
Leftists=Red Communists=Red Porto
:) |
Originally Posted by India Four Two
(Post 11346264)
I remember one of my friends wrote Port and Starboard on his white leather flying gloves!
Speaking of flying gloves, why did the RAF persist in using white gloves? They were particularly unsuitable for preflighting a Gipsy Major-powered aircraft! I think I went through a pair a year. Nowadays I have a pair of black USAF Nomex gloves. Much more practical. I always assumed the white cape leather was there to make hand signals more obvious; green was introduced for some years but I believe white is available these days? All brands of UK Mil, not just the RAF :ok: On an aside, relating to being visible, when we trialed the then-new green LSJs the first thing we noticed when strapped in was that we could see the instruments without the usual yellow reflections we were used to from the old jackets. Similarly, in FJ vs Wessex intercept trials the glaring aiming point for all jet jockeys was the pilot's white helmet; but many, many years passed before the helmets were changed to green. |
Originally Posted by angry ant
(Post 11342891)
There is no, RED PORT LEFT, in the bottle. QED.
|
Originally Posted by Mogwi
(Post 11345480)
|
The point of specifying 1, 2 etc, for engines is that they are numbered in increasing order from port to starboard as if you were reading a book, where the text goes from left to right across the page.
As well as this, the same convention works for identifying wheels, tyres, brake packs, on multi-wheeled aircraft and of course on aircraft with more than two engines. |
Books I read here go from right to left… :8
(But we do drive on the right (left) side of the road.) |
I knew someone would bring that up ! :)
|
I always assumed the white cape leather was there to make hand signals more obvious; |
Originally Posted by Uplinker
(Post 11350100)
The point of specifying 1, 2 etc, for engines is that they are numbered in increasing order from port to starboard as if you were reading a book, where the text goes from left to right across the page.
|
Originally Posted by EXDAC
(Post 11343258)
I have never flown, or been in, a BN2 but I confirmed they do use port and starboard as descriptors:
https://britten-norman.com/app/uploa...Islander-1.pdf Some references seem to suggest that left, aft, and right were the descriptors used for Trilander engines. Ooops, see somebody else made that observation! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:42. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.