PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   Interesting A320 flare technique (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/649303-interesting-a320-flare-technique.html)

Check Airman 11th Oct 2022 06:12

Interesting A320 flare technique
 
What are your thoughts on this flare technique? I assume he has to bump Vapp by quite a bit to make it work.




vilas 11th Oct 2022 08:02

A320 can be landed closing thrust but at 100ft or even before is suitable for slat and flap jammed at zero. Good old technique start flare and close thrust works in all aircraft and most conditions. A little before or after not an issue.

washoutt 11th Oct 2022 08:28

There is a large white area under the message from Check Airman. Should there be a video link there?

Black Pudding 11th Oct 2022 12:23

Imagine if he flared high and CM2 needed to take control and wanted to do a go around.

Capt Scribble 11th Oct 2022 12:34

If Airbus thought it was a great technique to close the TL at 100ft, I imagine they would write it in the FCOM. You just better hope you dont hit a downdraft with engines at idle.

FlexibleResponse 11th Oct 2022 14:11

Wow...Good luck with that technique!

John_McYul 11th Oct 2022 17:33

A friend of mine took a sim screening for a Chinese company a couple of years ago and failed because the A/THR OFF ECAM popped about 5 ft before touchdown (which sometimes happens even with a by-the-book flare). Apparently not the same company 😅

Rt Hon Jim Hacker MP 12th Oct 2022 06:40

Nothing wrong with that. He should be congratulated. Good technique and great for saving fuel. Should promote him to Head of Training.

SaulGoodman 13th Oct 2022 05:50

I don’t know what is more idiotic. This landing technique or showing it off on YT.

CW247 13th Oct 2022 07:33

Classic young Chinese spunky captains showing they're better than anyone else.

k.swiss 14th Oct 2022 15:01

Out of curiosity an examiner of mine did this in tail-wind conditions as a demonstration, cut the power around 50FT. However on Airbus Safety First they recommend cut power "later" for tail-wind conditions, so which one is it?!

vilas 14th Oct 2022 17:04


Originally Posted by k.swiss (Post 11313377)
Out of curiosity an examiner of mine did this in tail-wind conditions as a demonstration, cut the power around 50FT. However on Airbus Safety First they recommend cut power "later" for tail-wind conditions, so which one is it?!

For tailwind FCTM recommends early flare i.e. before 30ft. not cut power early. Thrust can reduced at normal 20ft, a little early or late as required.

Check Airman 15th Oct 2022 06:13

Thanks all. I thought it looked a bit premature. The earliest I've seed somebody go to idle in "normal" conditions was 50ft. It got my attention, but I'd rather not try it. 100ft seems like you're asking for trouble.

chimbu warrior 15th Oct 2022 11:09

Classic set-up for a tail strike if you ask me.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:58.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.