PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   "Radio Altimeter Alive" call (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/608315-radio-altimeter-alive-call.html)

wiggy 3rd May 2018 07:32


A question for you.Can you explain the reason for one manufacturers call at DA "continue"? Why not " landing or land" What is the purpose of this call and when should it be used?.....
+1 to the two above replies..:hmm:

The explanation we got when the company changed the call in our SOPs was that saying “land” was quite definitive and was perhaps subconsciously shifts the mental model/expectations of all involved in the wrong direction, whereas with “continue” you are reinforcing the fact you’ve still got options....

compressor stall 3rd May 2018 09:25

My unadulterated FCOM states that it’s PF “checked” but if there’s no callout, it’s PM “RAdio altimeter alive”.

carnival30 4th May 2018 09:56


Originally Posted by vilas (Post 10136692)
The call "Landing" was changed by airbus to "continue" because it became like a commitment to land and the only decision you take at minima is go around flaps or continue. Even below minima GA possibility exists. This is subtle change some airlines still use landing.

Yeah Boeing FCTM also says 'continue' at DA/DH however below DA/DH, it says PF to call out 'Landing' if visual cues established. I find this interesting and puzzled a bit.

So are we going to call both Continue at DA and Landing below DA or is it just enough to call Continue at DA.

About the RA alive call, I dont see anywhere in boeing they recommend the call out checked or anything like that. But as many pointed out about good airmanship and using the call out.

sjimmy 4th May 2018 23:26

No call at all on our 747
what we do say when cleared below Relevant MSA
is terrain. And PM goes or was already on terrain mode

back to Boeing 5th May 2018 23:15


Originally Posted by Jwscud (Post 10135898)
Having had a GPWS failure in a 773 a few months back, I just asked my partner in crime to call “50” and flared based on the view out of the window. Result (in benign conditions) - my best landing of the year. The main thing I missed was not so much the call outs but the cadence of the call outs giving an extra cue to the rate of descent and progress of the flare.

id totally agree with the last points. I can land reasonably well without any callouts. In the flare I'm eyeballing it. But the cadence of the calls help me to fine tune it.

The relevance of the 2500 call is vital for SA. Why am I getting the 2500 call now when I'm still 20 miles out (I'm not saying it has happened to me.....yet). Having an awareness of when you should get the call will save someone's ass one day.

Goldenrivett 6th May 2018 14:02


The relevance of the 2500 call is vital for SA. Why am I getting the 2500 call now when I'm still 20 miles out (I'm not saying it has happened to me.....yet).

what we do say when cleared below Relevant MSA is terrain. And PM goes or was already on terrain mode
https://www.pprune.org/images/infopop/icons/icon14.gif

Have a read of https://assets.publishing.service.go...975_G-AWNJ.pdf
This was before the days of "Terrain on ND" and even before GPWS was fitted.
Nairobi airfield is at an Altitude of 5,330 feet and the crew believed they were cleared to Altitude 5,000 ft. The crew acknowledged the radio Alt call of 2,500 feet (top of page 4) and during the approach they had full fly up on the ILS GP.
They must have been really fatigued!

airguy2012 13th May 2018 03:30

How is about auto callout "Minimum" not generated?
 
How is about "Minimum" not generated? I see this report in the techlog but when test will not listenable on ground, even programming with RA test-set. Anyone know this problem?
tks for discuss

FlightDetent 13th May 2018 09:07

On a certain popular type, for units equipped with AFS "QFE option" the auto call outs at minimum and 100 above do not sound on a LNAV-VNAV coupled approach (they do on ILS). A documented bug.

vilas 13th May 2018 16:47

Goldenrivett

They must have been really fatigued!
They were very lucky. The crew of Flying Tiger Line 747 Freighter were not so lucky. On 19th Feb1989 when given clearance "Descent two four zero zero" descended below minimum height of NDB approach 2400ft and fatally crashed into hill side at 600ft. just before reaching NDB.

wiedehopf 13th May 2018 18:30


Originally Posted by vilas (Post 10145783)
Goldenrivett
They were very lucky. The crew of Flying Tiger Line 747 Freighter were not so lucky. On 19th Feb1989 when given clearance "Descent two four zero zero" descended below minimum height of NDB approach 2400ft and fatally crashed into hill side at 600ft. just before reaching NDB.

video made about that flight:

really hard to watch :(

pineteam 14th May 2018 03:34


Originally Posted by pineteam (Post 10134921)
Talking for Airbus, I never noticed such a delay. In any case, the call out by the crew should be made when the reading is displayed.
in the other hand, I noticed sometimes the RA comes alive but no auto call out at 2500 AGL. Don’t know why.

Up for this question. Anyone knows the reason why? Again yesterday the RA became alive at 2500' AGL but no auto call out until 1000' AGL. A319, MSN 1758. Thanks.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:17.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.