PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   B787-8 APU (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/521130-b787-8-apu.html)

gfmb 11th Aug 2013 05:04

B787-8 APU
 
From Stockholm Arlanda Airport extranet:

"In conjunction with the introduction of its B787-8, British Airways has applied for an exemption to use an auxiliary power unit (APU) throughout the turnaround process as recommended by Boeing."

Link: AI-121-2013 Exemption for use of APU - Swedavia Extranet

Anybody who knows the reason/s why behind "...as recommended by Boeing..."?

(BA is using the B787 on one flight between LHR-ARN-LHR per day during 09AUG-21SEP13 as part of the introduction of the aircraft)

squarehole 12th Aug 2013 10:24

This is pure guesswork but I guess the extra time is used to assess APU performance and as an APU is effectively an engine the extra running time will allow a mechanical run in period to ensure long term efficiency.

archae86 12th Aug 2013 11:54

shaft bowing?
 
My guess is that this is a reference to shut-down/startup restrictions related to the shaft bowiing problem.

Ian W 12th Aug 2013 14:55

Archae86

My guess is that this is a reference to shut-down/startup restrictions related to the shaft bowiing problem.
This may well be the case as the turn around time for a short 'shuttle' flight may be a lot less than for the expected routine flights of the 787; 45 - 60 minutes compared to 90 to 180 minutes.

EEngr 12th Aug 2013 15:20

In the linked article I see a reference to an "environmental permit". Perhaps they are trying to minimize the airport's carbon footprint by encouraging the use of ground power.

Mr @ Spotty M 12th Aug 2013 16:10

It might be to save on the requirement for the two GPUs that would be required for the turn round.
Positioning the extra GPU and the removal may impact the access around the aircraft for the short turn round also.
Keeping the APU running also eliminates the APU failing to start, which is required to start the engines.
If the APU fails to start, you will then have to find a third GPU quickly for engine start-up or you will end up with a delay, which BA does not want.

FE Hoppy 12th Aug 2013 16:16

How many GPUs does that thing need???!!!

Mr @ Spotty M 12th Aug 2013 20:30

If you only have 90 KVA producing units, you will need three for engine starting.

Swedish Steve 13th Aug 2013 18:15


My guess is that this is a reference to shut-down/startup restrictions related to the shaft bowiing problem.
Correct. The BA780/! has a 1hr 15min gate stop. The rules with the APU cooling cycles don't leave any leeway if you shut it down.
Over on T5 (at ARN) we shut down the Qatar B787 APU, but that has around 2 hrs gate time and it works OK.
B787 must have two 90KVA GPU at the fwd connections at all times, or you get load shedding. It says in the book that you can start one engine with two GPUs, but we haven't tried yet. The APU easily starts both at once.

TURIN 14th Aug 2013 12:39

In addition to the above, Ground power has a tendancy to drop off line under heavy loads. At the moment, an unexpected and non normal shutdown of the 787 computer systems will cause hours of resets and tests before dispatch.
Also, if you want air conditioning on ground, and there is no conditioned air available on stand, then either a 3rd GPU is required or run the APU.


Posted from Pprune.org App for Android

nicolai 14th Aug 2013 22:44


Originally Posted by TURIN (Post 7992355)
In addition to the above, Ground power has a tendancy to drop off line under heavy loads. At the moment, an unexpected and non normal shutdown of the 787 computer systems will cause hours of resets and tests before dispatch.
Also, if you want air conditioning on ground, and there is no conditioned air available on stand, then either a 3rd GPU is required or run the APU.

With the carbon bootprint (and non-CO2 emissions like soot and nitrous oxides) from (perhaps) three diesel GPUs grumbling away next to the aircraft, perhaps running a nice new clean turbine APU is looking like a better idea!

(Some of the ground power might come from fixed installations powered from the building mains but how many stands have 3 of those available, or even two - and how much dirtier is a diesel GPU than a Jet A1 APU?)

Swedish Steve 15th Aug 2013 09:35

Here in Scandinavia, and most of Europe, running the APU on the ground is not an option. That is why we got the dispensation in the first place. On every other aircraft at ARN, the APU is shut down as soon as ground power is attached, and started again when the door is shut for departure.
Every gate has one FEGP, and they are very reliable, and nearly all the widebody gates here have two FEGP. It is not a good idea to run the packs from ground power, other systems will load shed, so the third GPU will only be required for an engine start. If it comes to it we will attempt a start from the two FEGP first and see how it goes. The AMM says it will work.

You can only use modern diesel GPUs on the B787, older ones do not have stable enough frequency. Modern GPUs are very quiet, and much preferable to an APU.
Get out on the ramp at ARN one day. Sometimes you can hear the birds singing it is so quiet!

nicolai 15th Aug 2013 09:57


Originally Posted by Swedish Steve (Post 7993724)
Get out on the ramp at ARN one day. Sometimes you can hear the birds singing it is so quiet!

Sounds very pleasant! Thanks for the info.

Pub User 15th Aug 2013 23:21

The 787 APU is extremely quiet, and in fact is drowned-out by the CACs & Packs running when on the ground. Two GPUs would probably produce as much noise.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:41.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.