PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   AF 447 Search to resume (part2) (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/449639-af-447-search-resume-part2.html)

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:17

CSMU of SSFDR
 
Nick L,

Please comment on:

http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/comm...er_(SSFDR).pdf

Rgds,

Mac

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:23

CSMU of 4700 SSFDR
 
Nick L,

Please inform the url links to clarify the issue!

Rgds,

Mac

slf99 1st May 2011 20:28

Has anyone else spotted that in the bottom left hand corner of this BEA picture from the ship's control centre, on the floor next to the operator there is an FDR in a case?

http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....mages/fdr3.jpg

Is this simply to show what they are looking for?

snowfalcon2 1st May 2011 20:29

Centrosphere
 
Re. the former suggestions of picture alteration please notice from this and this picture that they share some properties with the earlier picture of the FDR chassis:

- a clear difference in color tint between the blueish left side and the greenish right side of the picture, with the border line running roughly diagonally. This suggests that the ROV's searchlight lamps are of different color temperature (and intensity).

- On the right-hand screen shown in the second picture, the center of the picture has low contrast and shows few features ("vanishing shadows effect") while out to the sides there are more shadows and more pronounced contrasts. Just as in the picture of the FDR chassis.

Conclusion: The equipment is not 100% perfect, but there is little to suggest any special editing of the earlier image.

Just my 2 cents :ok:

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:30

Your link is from a COMBI
 
Henra,

https://commerce.honeywell.com/wcsstore/B2BDirectMyAerospaceAssetStore/images/catalog/SSFDR_800x800.jpg


Read the label in the box!

Digital voice data recorder (combi)

AF447 used the LONG model. This is the short one.

Mac

AlphaZuluRomeo 1st May 2011 20:30


Originally Posted by jcjeant (Post 6423428)

I plead guilty. It was sarcastic ;)
Let's say it's a way of preemptively couper l'herbe sous le pied of conspirationnists.

llagonne66 1st May 2011 20:33

Guilty too !!
 
I was in the same mood as AlphaZuluRomeo :O

Nick L 1st May 2011 20:36

RR_NDB,
That was the data sheet I was referring to. On Figure 1, the annotated drawing shows "ED-55/56a Crash Survivable Memory Unit (CSMU) (1X or 2X model)". That indicates to me that the CSMU depicted in that drawing is representative only of a 1X or 2X model SSFDR.

If we go to Section 8.0, we see that they have described the "4X" model SSFDR, with part numbers 980-4700-04X. This is presumably a newer model of SSFDR than what is shown in the diagram. According to the BEA reports, this is the type of SSFDR that was aboard F-GZCP. It is possible that the Honeywell data sheet is not fully up to date (it is dated March 2000) as there are no diagrams for the "4X" SSFDR.


If we take a look at the Brazilian authorities' report into the Gol 1907/N600XL collision here:
http://www.ntsb.gov/Aviation/Brazil-...sh_version.pdf

(I know I keep harping on about the Gol mid-air collision, but it was the most recent accident for which I knew what the FDR looked like)

In section 3.11, "Flight Recorders", on pages 62 and 63, we see in Table 14 that both PR-GTD and N600XL were equipped with the same, Honeywell model 980-4700-042, recorders as F-GZCP. The photos of the SSFDRs (Figures 16 and 17) from both aircraft show cylindrical CSMUs, which match what the BEA recovered.

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:40

Henra and Nick L,

Look:

http://50.img.v4.skyrock.com/50c/avi...s/14832296.jpg

mm43 1st May 2011 20:43

Has anyone noticed the attachment points for the brackets holding the now missing ULB!

The pic below has been cropped from the BEA's high resolution image. I assume that the tensile strength of the attachment bolts is designed so that failure will occur without internal damage to the container.

http://oi54.tinypic.com/2zzkr36.jpg

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:43

CSMU geometries
 
http://50.img.v4.skyrock.com/50c/avi...s/15292660.jpg

AlphaZuluRomeo 1st May 2011 20:46

@ RR_NDB

Please take a look at this picture from the BEA website (here : Information, 27 avril 2011 - FR version, EN briefing also available)

The HiRes pic allows us to read what's written on the right side of the "chassis" :
SOLID STATE MEMORY FLIGHT DATA RECORDER.

So what ?

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 20:46

CSMU
 

I assume that the tensile strength of the attachment bolts is designed so that failure will occur without internal damage to the container.
For sure!

Question: Is this a CSMU of a FDR or CVR?

Machinbird 1st May 2011 20:52

I hope they weigh the module and very carefully record its serial numbers before popping it into the Court representative's sealed satchel for transport back to France. That would give some idea of the state of the contents and help deflect potential conspiracy theorists.:hmm:

Good job on the part of the recovery crew. :ok:

After seeing the beat up DFDR chassis with the missing memory module, I was not too surprised by the missing pinger. But the design needs rethinking. For Sure!

mm43 1st May 2011 20:55

RR_NDB

Question: Is this a CSMU of a FDR or CVR?
I thought you "knew" which it was.:}

henra 1st May 2011 20:56


Originally Posted by RR_NDB (Post 6423522)
Henra,

https://commerce.honeywell.com/wcsstore/B2BDirectMyAerospaceAssetStore/images/catalog/SSFDR_800x800.jpg


Read the label in the box!

Digital voice data recorder (combi)

AF447 used the LONG model. This is the short one.

Mac


Yes, in the meantime I have seen it myself.

:O

Still, I'm convinced that the more square shaped CSMu are simply older generation and that CVR and DFDR share the same type of CSMU.
Back in 'net fishing for pics...

Edit:

At least I found a pic of the CSMU on the Honeywell page.
The most recent ones seem to be cylindrical and they describe it as memory for the SSFDR.
Solid State Flight Data Recorder - Honeywell Aerospace
Could be still a wrong image though.

Swedishflyingkiwi 1st May 2011 20:57

FDR
 
Has anybody noticed the third picture released today from BEA actually has a FDR on the floor in the bottom left of the image. (In a glass case)
http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....mages/fdr3.jpg

Perhaps this was an example for them to see what they were looking for, or is this the actual recovered item?

Centrosphere 1st May 2011 21:03

Snowfalcon2,


The equipment is not 100% perfect, but there is little to suggest any special editing of the earlier image.
Yes, I do agree that these new samples show many similarities to the older one. I think we can put the image manipulation theory to rest for a while.:ok:

MountainWest 1st May 2011 21:04

Sample . . .
 
Swedishflyingkiwi,

Must be a sample. Note the paper in the container, under the unit. It would be kept in water if a recovered unit.

snowfalcon2 1st May 2011 21:09

What happens next?

Will the Ile de Sein steam to nearest port to offload the FDR CSMU or will the BEA try to extract the data while on the ship?

Will they continue search for the CVR, or is the FDR important enough for the ship to head for port? Or are there other ships in the area that can transport the FDR ashore?

I guess the site is far enough offshore that a helicopter is not of much use.

Centrosphere 1st May 2011 21:12

Swedishflyingkiwi,


Perhaps this was an example for them to see what they were looking for, or is this the actual recovered item?
I also believe it to be a sample. This rises an interesting question: these monitors must be located somewhere at the ship, where, maybe, other people analyzes the images from the ROV. It makes sense, because the operator of the ROV must be too busy to operate the equipment and still search for anything. Alas, the two monitors show the same scene from different POVs, what is consistent with the REMORA 6000 specs (two cameras). I would like to know if this is real time or not.

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 21:13

Fine business from Nick L 1st May 2011 17:36
 
Nick L,

I invite you to be in my craft as a crew member!

Bingo!

glad rag 1st May 2011 21:13

mm43
"I assume that the tensile strength of the attachment bolts is designed so that failure will occur without internal damage to the container."

Yep. For example, the bracket that attaches the SLB (Sonar Locating Beacon) to the ADR of a Tornado A/C [SLB introduced by a MOD many years ago] has specific shimming requirements to allow the maximum "grasp" whilst being able to separate, in extremis, without leading to data section penetration or further damage. The drive unit etc are expendable.

PS just re read your post and on looking at the enlargement there appears to be some visual evidence of possible penetration at the case circumfrence.

Whatever, some great news indeed, fingers crossed.

Centrosphere 1st May 2011 21:16

Snowfalcon2,


Will they continue search for the CVR, or is the FDR important enough for the ship to head for port? Or are there other ships in the area that can transport the FDR ashore?
I think I remember to read somewhere that a frigate or other ship would be used to transport the FDR and the CVR to the continent.

Both equipments are too important to they dare to transport it by chopper. Besides, I think that the Ile de Sein has not an helipont.

Swedishflyingkiwi 1st May 2011 21:30

Centrosphere

This rises an interesting question: these monitors must be located somewhere at the ship, where, maybe, other people analyzes the images from the ROV.... I would like to know if this is real time or not.
Yes, after more thought it certainly looks like this is a "live review" room on the ship. The window at the back of the room looks very 'ship-like'.

Perhaps this photo was taken 'live' as they loaded the item into the basket. In the background you also see a lot of shredded debris...
Rather than sorting through downloaded images, they are preferring a quick digital photo 'live' from the review room to release to the media as an indication of what is going on. Hi-res photos will be saved for the investigators, us normal people have to settle for what they feed us...

AlphaZuluRomeo 1st May 2011 21:37

For those having doubts about a potential FDR/CVR CSMU confusion, please take a look at my post #447 (hey, what serendipity!)

AZR

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 21:39

Cylindrical CSMU for FDR
 
Henra, Nick L

Solid State Flight Data Recorder - Honeywell Aerospace
This is another model but SHOWS a very important point:

They are also using the cylindrical shape for FDR.

Nick L warned and i am closing now the investigation.

I think we can close the issue.

Honeywell website was not update, BEA has the update and now let´s hope to find the other CSMU and to be both READABLE.

Rgds,

Mac

Landroger 1st May 2011 21:42

First of all, I think there has been a huge, silent, sigh of relief that a memory module had been retrieved; a tribute to the determination and persistence of all - including AF and AB. I must admit I had the most severe doubts that anything useful would be found and I am delighted that it has. The possibility that the utter disappearance of a modern, well founded airliner was going to remain an almost unexplained mystery was not an edifying one.

Second, for all those SLF and uninitiated on here who, like me, have followed these threads from day one, has it been established definitively that the device recovered is the memory module - ie: the data itself - of the Flight Data Recorder?

Roger.

Nick L 1st May 2011 21:45


Nick L,

I invite you to be in my craft as a crew member!

Bingo!

Kudos,

Mac
RR_NDB,

Thanks, and if I came off as an a** in my replies to you I apologize.

Sincerely,
Nick

D Bru 1st May 2011 21:51

Dukane pinger on the BEA photo
 
Anybody noticed that in the third picture released today from BEA there is actually a "Dukane" (DK120?) ULB standing upright on the top of the wooden cabinet just near the left-down hand corner of the right flatscreen ??
http://www.bea.aero/fr/enquetes/vol....mages/fdr3.jpg

So, with the FDR in the perspex box, that is what they are (were) looking for.

http://www.rjeint.com/pdf/DK-120revD.pdf

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 21:52

Cylindrical CSMU for FDR
 
AlphaZuluRomeo,

Perfect,

Thanks!

Mac

mm43 1st May 2011 22:00

glad rag

looking at the enlargement there appears to be some visual evidence of possible penetration at the case circumfrence.
Was hoping someone would notice that, but suspect that even if water has penetrated under pressure, that the individual chips will still give up their contents when interrogated.

Thanks for your reply to my earlier posting.

Centrosphere 1st May 2011 22:05

From the New York Times:


Because of its remote location, 600 miles off the northern coast of Brazil, it was expected to take eight to 10 days before the data recorder’s memory unit could be transported — first by boat, then by plane — to Paris, where investigators will attempt to download the information it contains.
So maybe, let´s say, 20 days before some news? How much time until some reading is done (if the memory chip is in good state)?

"Ile de Sein" took only three days to reach it´s present location from Recife, Brazil. So I believe the transport ship is coming from another place (France?), and heading there after meeting the "Ile".

This is also interesting:


After three failed searches, a team of oceanographers located the wreckage last month, barely six miles from the plane’s last known location.
I haven´t seen this information before.

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 22:10

Ace
 
Nick L, (Age: 21, Posts: 5)

We must check everything. Murphy´s law never fail.

And we fail despite being very careful.

When you warned i started IMMEDIATELY to investigate.

I will show to my crew (my kids) your "fine business". Good example.

Best regards,

Mac, (age 61)

PS

At your age i started my passion for aviation and learned to be careful. Doing maintenance in HF big transmitters, Data equipt., VHF and BIG, POWERFUL and DANGEROUS NDB.

The RR (QRG 375 Kc/s*) NDB was like a MW Broadcast STN. Huge!


* Now KHz

jcjeant 1st May 2011 22:17

Hi,


a tribute to the determination and persistence of all - including AF and AB
Methink you forget (or .. it is included in all ? ) to quote the determination and persistence of the families associations who fought for the researches continue ....

jcjeant 1st May 2011 22:22

Hi,


Because of its remote location, 600 miles off the northern coast of Brazil, it was expected to take eight to 10 days before the data recorder’s memory unit could be transported — first by boat, then by plane — to Paris, where investigators will attempt to download the information it contains.
Funnily enough one point of view of justice when we know that the BEA is subject of a complaint for obstruction in search of truth in this matter :sad:

RR_NDB 1st May 2011 22:27

CSMU of FDR
 
Landroger,


has it been established definitively that the device recovered is the memory module - ie: the data itself - of the Flight Data Recorder?
They found one Crash Survivable Memory Unit (CSMU). They said is the FDR memory.

The rack found before is no longer important.

Now the missing important part is the CSMU of SSCVR, also cylindrical shaped.

Let´s finger cross.

Mac

RatherBeFlying 1st May 2011 22:28

As previously stated by the BEA, a French Navy ship will pick up the CSMU to take it to the nearest port under French control (most likely Fr. Guiana) from where it will be flown to the BEA labs.

SeenItAll 1st May 2011 22:37

See this news article on the recovered memory unit. Investigators find black box from Air France crash - Yahoo! News

mm43 1st May 2011 22:39

Centrosphere;

"Ile de Sein" took only three days to reach it´s present location from Recife, Brazil.
Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.:=

"Ile de Sein" departed from Dakar, Senegal for her voyage to the Recovery Operation Position (ROP).


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:04.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.