PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Tech Log (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log-15/)
-   -   A340 vs 747-400 (https://www.pprune.org/tech-log/10259-a340-vs-747-400-a.html)

cortilla 19th Oct 2000 19:27

A340 vs 747-400
 
a friend of mine is capt. with SIA, and whenever he flys to singapore on 747-400, he's always complaining that A340's ahead of him are always slowing him down. How true is this, or is he just a man who likes to moan (like most of us humans)

Lucifer 19th Oct 2000 20:47

The A340 does has a slightly slower cruising speed than the 747-400. Thus it is unable to use some routes such as the new Tokyo route that BA is using with -400s due to certain restrictions.

jtr 19th Oct 2000 20:49

The 340 plods along at around 0.82, whilst the -400 is more in the region of 0.84 or 0.85 (depend on the airlines op. proc. of course) So yes, at the same level the the -400 will close. The 340 will usually step higher earlier though (at heavy weights) so not always a prob. As you say human nature, like being in the circuit in a C210, and bitching about the Tomohawk in front.

Lucifer, what routes place a restriction on min. speed? I am aware of Mach no. technique etc, but have not heard of a route not being available to an a/c type per se. In my experience, he who is in front generally get to set the pace.

[This message has been edited by jtr (edited 19 October 2000).]

ManaAdaSystem 19th Oct 2000 21:51

There used to be some airways in Russia with a max speed of .80. Maybe still?
The guy in front has the right of way. A simple fact that a few pilots seem quite unaware of.

Lucifer 20th Oct 2000 17:28

I don't know details, but BA are flying a new Tokyo route with -400s, which Virgin are unable to use with their A340s.

jtr 20th Oct 2000 19:00

Sound like it may be either an eng-out prob., or an O2 capacity one. The Virgin 340's have the smaller CFM on them, and maybe can't maintain terrain clearence if one goes out, or it may be that they can maintain the required alt., but don't have the O2 to be able to stay high enough long enough.
On the NOPAC routes between Anchorage/Vancouver etc, and Japan and further, you will often hear speed jockeying going on. Whoever is in front is entitled to stick to whatever speed they choose. Some of the 340 guys even slow down if the -400 behind them complains too much.

[This message has been edited by jtr (edited 20 October 2000).]

tired 22nd Oct 2000 00:26

Lucifer/jtr - there's a high speed airway in eastern Siberia that has a min. speed of .84 or .85 (can't remember the exact speed), so it's effectively limited to 747s.

Despite all the whingeing from the Jumbo brigade there's not a hell of a difference in TAS between .82 and .85 - a jumbo picks up maybe 20 minutes in a 12 hour flight. Not that you'd believe it listening to all the moaning coming from the sharp end :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:49.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.