Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Radioactive residues due to baggage scans?

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Radioactive residues due to baggage scans?

Old 3rd Feb 2002, 01:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Radioactive residues due to baggage scans?

Hi y'all,

one question that came up the other day whilst we were getting our crew baggage x-rayed for the 100th time this year: . .Can there any radioactive residue be left due to the multiple scans i.e. in the laptop or cellphone batteries or whereever? <img src="confused.gif" border="0">

greetings

4Screws
4Screws is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 02:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: was south, now north
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

no
CI300 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 02:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Out West
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

wong one

Good answer; you think that one up all on your own?
Orca strait is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 03:09
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: was south, now north
Posts: 152
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

and how did your reply answer the question?

That was the best I can do until after I catch up on some sleep.
CI300 is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 03:20
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

@wong one:

What makes you think it does NOT accumulate?. .Do you have any background info on that?. .It doesnt help to post a subjective impression on that matter.

Does anyone have information on the strength and type of that radiation source used in these scanners compared to medical purpose x-ray scanners?

Which would be the maximum dosis allowed of that specific radiation p.a. ?

Which materials are susceptible to the accumulation of such radiation?

questions, questions, questions ....

rgds

4Screws
4Screws is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 05:14
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Stella Maris.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

While X-Ray's are a form of ionization radiation that is potentially hazardous,levels used to check hand baggage are relatively 'very' low. Levels in the region of (aprox) 0.05 mR(millirem) per inspection are about average. . . Put into perspective you receive 3mR in about 4 days of exposure from radiation received naturally from the sun ! and about 4 mR from background radiation when you fly coast to coast in the US !.. . The max annual dose (not STD's !!) for US & Canadian radiation workers is 5000mR !.. . So you can see that a second head growth spurt is unlikely !!.
ragspanner is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 05:22
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

An answer from a drunk ex-chemistry current biotechnology student private pilot person....:. .Would say: NO!! From what I remember (please others correct me if incorrect!!) regarding radiation you should only be worried about emitters of ionising radiation that hang around (e.g. radioactive dust : alpha, beta and gamma emitters!...NOT X-ray machines!!). Any interaction between the radiation and the 'receiver' is short lived, and the energy is usually given out in heat...possibly light or sound etc once it hits the 'receiver'. X rays will not 'hang around' at all!!! If I were a high altitude pilot I would be much more worried about ionising radiation from other sources!!. .Do not worry about it (IMHO). .As always take my answers with a pinch of salt as I am sure someone will be able to find a large error in my reply!. .Cheers. <img src="wink.gif" border="0">

[ 03 February 2002: Message edited by: tom775257 ]</p>
tom775257 is online now  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 06:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Melbourne,Vic,Australia
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

No

Ionizing radiation can strip electrons from an atom, radioactivity comes from the nucleus.. .To turn a non radioactive atom to a radioactive one with electromagnetic radiation requires enough energy in the photon to fiddle with the nucleus, far more than Xray photons.

It should be noted that virtually all substances include some radioactive isotopes even water has some tritium in it.
Deaf is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2002, 10:47
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CYHU
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

As was just mentioned: No.

In sufficient quantities however, even x-ray photons can activate materials.

X-ray energies used in medical CT scanners, and diagnostic x-ray units are in the order of 100 keV. I suspect that baggage inspection equipment use similar radiation sources. Radiation may directly or indirectly damage tissue, or inanimate matter, but it does not generally render it radioactive. In order to do so, the energy, exposure time, and exposure rate would have to be increased significanlty (by several orders of magnitude each) and even then, this may only activate heavy metals with lot's of nuclei around. And even if that was the case, the activation, and therefore "radioactive period" would last only a few seconds.

152 . .PS. my day job = medical radiation physicist

[ 03 February 2002: Message edited by: 152captain ]</p>
152captain is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.