Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airbus MCDU Speeds - Air Canada 875 Tailstrike

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airbus MCDU Speeds - Air Canada 875 Tailstrike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Jul 2003, 06:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canada
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus MCDU Speeds - Air Canada 875 Tailstrike

It would seem to me, that it would be possible (easy ??) to have the Airbus software calculate the corect V1, V2, Vr speeds and the c.o.g. postion, based on having sensors in the cargo and passenger compartments that would calculate the total weight and weight distribution.

Second best, would have the software pick up a wide discrepency between the entered V speeds.

The software should at least know that at XX tons of weight V1, Vr = SSSS is impossible ???

For manual backup, aren't there any charts that correlate the V speeds and the aircraft weight ?

Is it normal for V1, Vr to differ by 30 knots ??

Mike


http://www.bst.gc.ca/en/reports/air/...9/A02F0069.asp
mstram is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2003, 09:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two check airman flying together.........
Better post a NOTAM.....
viking737 is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2003, 10:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mstram

On the 330/340 I fly we now have an automated procedure for retrieving RTOW figures via ACARS. You enter airport ID, Rwy, temp, QNH, config, surface cond, wind, ZFW, TOW, and MEL items. After a minute or so it prints out the numbers. No system is foolproof. Garbage in garbage out. For now we will also have to rely on the ground staff for load sheets, as this is all that is available. Maybe in the next generation of buses an automatic system of calculating CofG and stab trim setting will be available. We will have to wait until then.

404 Titan is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2003, 20:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Trenton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Canada has an identical automated procedure for retrieving take-off performance data via ACARS-WAT.

As a back up procedure an OPS computer transaction or a weight limitations chart is calculated by flight dispatch.

Best Regards,

Ryan
Rynopilot is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2003, 23:23
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canada
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
404,

What about the 30 knot difference ?

Is that normal ? .. possible ?

Will the V speeds differ depending on where the c.o.g. is ? .. or is "200 ton" = 150 knots" regardless of where the c.o.g is ?

Mike
C172 driver
mstram is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2003, 01:50
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Trenton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike,

Although take-off performance data is calculated automatically, the pilot must manually enter the appropriate speeds into the CDU.

When calculating the take-off performance data the aircraft CG is not factored.

Best Regards,

Ryan
Rynopilot is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2003, 04:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 39 Likes on 18 Posts
Why Not Automatic Entry?

Don't mean to reignite a Boeing vs. Airbus flame war, but my impression of the 744 FMC is that confirming the calculated V-speeds on the FMC automatically enters them on the PFD airspeed tape.

One less opportunity for a keyboard error to really mess things up -- as long as you enter the weights correctly
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2003, 09:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Toronto, Ont, Canada
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryan

>When calculating the take-off performance data the aircraft CG is not factored.

Thx, that's what I thought.

But I was not absolutely sure, when it comes to the "big iron"

Mike
mstram is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.