Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

HF transmissions

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

HF transmissions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jun 2003, 17:25
  #1 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question HF transmissions

Back in the time everybody was told to avoid HF transmissions while refuelling on the ground.

A few years ago Chiefpilot told us this precaution is no longer necessary, as the modern equipment is totally different, no more valves (?), and so on, and a big debate arose.

So, are HF transmissions to be avoided while refuelling on modern aircrafts or not?
Thanks
LEM is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2003, 17:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: brisbane, Australia
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't do it !!!If in doubt have a look where the HF antenna is and them walk away from it for 25- 50 metres (depending on transmitter)and then walk in a radius around the focal point(danger zone !!)Have a look at your radio ops licence regards refuelling !!!
fruitloop is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2003, 18:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
-regardless of the type of HF Transceiver you are still transmiting a lot of RF energy.

Boeing 757/767 manual states

DO NOT OPERATE THE HF COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WHILE PERSONS REFUEL OR DEFUEL THE AIRPLANE. AN EXPLOSION CAN CAUSE INJURIES TO PERSONS AND DAMAGE TO THE AIRPLANE.

MAKE SURE PERSONNEL STAY A MINIMUM OF 6 FEET AWAY FROM THE VERTICAL STABILIZER WHEN THE HF SYSTEM TRANSMITS. RF ENERGY FROM THE HF COMMUNICATION ANTENNA CAN CAUSE INJURIES TO PERSONNEL.
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2003, 09:16
  #4 (permalink)  
QAVION
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"A few years ago Chiefpilot told us this precaution is no longer necessary, as the modern equipment is totally different, no more valves (?), and so on, and a big debate arose."

Peak output power still remains roughly the same for HF USB transmissions, LEM (400Watts) on modern HF systems. It shouldn't make a difference how that power is generated (valves or transistors).

Proximity of wiring and antennae to fuelling systems may have some bearing on the issue (many Boeing aircraft now have the HF Antennae/Tuners in the tail) rather than in the wing/wingtips. However, although I've found the following hard to believe, I've been told that transmissions can cause pieces of lockwire in remote locations to heat up at resonant frequencies (Perhaps if this lockwire is exposed to fuel dripping from refuelling connectors you could have a problem).

I can't say I've never accidently tuned the HF during refuelling, but it's not something I would make a habit of intentionally doing.

Perhaps your Chiefpilot is thinking of Radar technology where the power output is a lot less?

Regards.
Q.
 
Old 30th Jun 2003, 13:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: East Coast
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The amount of energy generated is still great. I was on a B737NG which was on ground power yesterday during a test of the HF system. During my transmission, the overhead warning lights would all dim with each syllable!!!
comxtek is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2003, 15:58
  #6 (permalink)  
LEM
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what I answered him! Thanks God that guy is no longer in charge....
LEM is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2003, 01:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Anywhere that pays
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LEM - I think we are all glad he has gone, but beware, I hear he still has 'friends' in place - and knows who you are! Be careful.
flt_lt_w_mitty is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2003, 11:34
  #8 (permalink)  
Props are for boats!
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well have to concurr with everyone dont do it.

HF Radios still give you a boot if you grab the antenna, regardles if it was oldvalve powered or modern transistorised output Power amplifier.

The RF energy emmited also can be picked up by other antenni ( anything piece of wire dental filling even)
in the immediate area, induce a voltage and discharge, causing you guessed it, a spark.

Youll notice that refuellers dont carry phones or Radios, or they shouldnt for this reason. Same reason for putting petrol in you car at the gas station, ( no cell phones).

When I was a techo in the RAAF, I serviced a multitude of different radios and everyone of them, when keyed, would trip the earth leakage circuit breakers power outlets, on the bench.

Food for thought

Regards
Sheep


P.S. During my training in the RAAF in LAVERTON VIC, we took a PRC-47 HF SET out bush and did some exersises. We used the conventional antenna inverted V and adjusted the wavelength. But we also used other objects. Like an old Barbwire fence and even a wet tree. Pretty robust stuff the old HF. Both execisises worked and we talked to our base in the School.

Last edited by Sheep Guts; 2nd Jul 2003 at 21:30.
Sheep Guts is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.