Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Dash 8 Spoiler deployment

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Dash 8 Spoiler deployment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jun 2003, 21:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Ivan Itchibum
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dash 8 Spoiler deployment

I have noticed on several ocassions the spoilers being deployed and retracted just prior to the Take off roll.

They seem to remain fully deployed until power is applied.

Is this an automatic test feature or is there another reason why it is conducted on the RWY?

Cheers in advance
 
Old 23rd Jun 2003, 00:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those were probably -100 series.

Those are ground spoilers. The control in the cockpit is a toggle switch called the "Flight/Taxi switch" It is normally selected to "Taxi" on the ground which stows them. Immediately prior to flight, they are selected to the "Flight" position. They will deploy whenever 1) there is weight on the wheels and 2) the power levers are near the flight idle position. Therefore, what you are seeing, when they come up prior to take-off is the FO selecting the switch to "Flight" on his line-up checks. They then retract as the power levers are advanced on the takeoff roll. They will not deploy again until the aircraft lands.

Having the Flight/Taxi switch in the "Flight" position is a requirement on the -100 series. The -200, -300 and -400's do not have ground spoilers (experience with the -100's showed it was more trouble than it was worth). If the crew fails to remember to select the Flight/Taxi switch to the "Flight" position, when the power levers are advanced it will automatically snap into the flight position with an audible click in the cockpit.

Another thing you may not have wanted to know, is that many airlines paint their ground spoilers black or red-- the most outboard ones can be seen from the cockpit and are an approved representive surface for a "last chance" detection of ice or snow build up prior to takeoff.

Does that answer your question?
Panama Jack is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2003, 04:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The middle
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Panama Jack is quite correct except that -400 also has the same system as the -100.

The -400 has considerable landing weight/runway length penalties with the system inoperative.
excrab is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2003, 15:54
  #4 (permalink)  
Ivan Itchibum
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Panama Jack!!

Good answer
 
Old 23rd Jun 2003, 16:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: "como todo buen piloto... mujeriego y borracho"
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK Excrab, I stand corrected-- thanks.

I've only seen the Q400's from a distance, just a couple of times, and was under the impression that only the -100's had it. Guess that is just an example of me not knowing what I am talking about

Cheers!
Panama Jack is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.