Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

FAF ALT COMPENSATION DUE TO TEMP.

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

FAF ALT COMPENSATION DUE TO TEMP.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 02:37
  #1 (permalink)  
basics52
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post FAF ALT COMPENSATION DUE TO TEMP.

Say your app. plate calls for an outer marker alt. of 1500´
Temp. deviation is ISA + 20

Whats the formula to obtain the corrected OM on GS Alt ?

 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 02:59
  #2 (permalink)  
Hew Jampton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

This should be in 'Questions'

Look in the Aerad book or your company Ops Manual, although the correction is for very low temps, not high.

[This message has been edited by Hew Jampton (edited 29 October 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Hew Jampton (edited 29 October 2000).]
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 04:50
  #3 (permalink)  
basics52
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Well , the question I made is for high temps.

You are correct , very low temps could become critical and for example baro vnav app plates will have a min temp shown in future charts .

So, anyone has a formula ?

Maybe the cold chart if used with opposite compensation will do it...

Could someone post a chart ?

That may be easier than finding the one I had .
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 06:41
  #4 (permalink)  
Prof2MDA
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Have an E6-B? Use it! True altitude is on all of them!
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 06:48
  #5 (permalink)  
quid
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

basics52,

Just out of curiousity sake, what would you use it for?
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 21:42
  #6 (permalink)  
reynoldsno1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

The approximate correction is 4ft per 100ft per degree difference from ISA (using the surface temp at the airfield you are approaching).

So, with a surface temp of -10C, at 2000ft the approximate error in your altimeter will be 4 x 2 x 25 = 200ft, i.e. you should be at an indicated 2200ft.
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 21:54
  #7 (permalink)  
reynoldsno1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

oops, that should read ... 4ft per 1000ft...
 
Old 30th Oct 2000, 22:35
  #8 (permalink)  
basics52
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post



REINOLDSNO :

Hey , you really understood my Q. THANKS !!

A formula like this will help me illustrate how for example in your case at 2000´
ISA- 20 C represents 200 feet error and at 200 ´ = 20´ etc...

Good rule of thumb , TKS

 
Old 4th Nov 2000, 08:22
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,800
Received 121 Likes on 58 Posts
Unhappy

From the Tech Log Archive (see the bottom of the forums page, or the bottom of the "go" window below):

Altimeter Correction Cold WX OPS

------------------
Tech Log forum moderator
Checkboard is online now  
Old 4th Nov 2000, 21:48
  #10 (permalink)  
airbuswhiz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

I co-wrote an article in the American/Canadian ALPA magazine about this very topic. I was also on the team that wrote the FAA directive for implementation of cold temp techniques.

The formula that was used was the old true altitude formula, and in most cases that will still be correct, but there has been a new formula developed. The new formula appears in ICAO PANS-OPS VI, I worked closely with the Canadian officials here and ICAO in Montreal about it's implementation. So I guess one could say that this subject is close to me. I also developed a training course that I used for some in the U.S. Also, I wrote a program that does corrections automatically. Hope this info helps, any more questions, just ask...

Cheers..airbuswhiz
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.