Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Back Seat Driver?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Back Seat Driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th June 2003 | 11:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: South East Asia
Back Seat Driver?

Saw this message on a GPS newsgroup. Watch the accuracy of your P.A. announcements ladies and gentlemen!

Quote:

On a Southwest Airlines flight from Nashville to Houston yesterday, I was
using my GPS and had a very good satellite lock with the altitude showing
39000 feet.. The captain announced that we were going to climb to 41000
feet to try to get above the choppy weather. We climbed to 43000 feet where
we leveled off and flew for about 15 minutes. Then, the captain announced
that he was sorry, but it appeared impossible to get high enough to smooth
out the ride, that we were at 41000 feet and that was the maximum height for
the 737 we were in. My little yellow etrex still showed a solid 43000 feet.
We continued at 43000 feet for about 10 more minutes until we abruptly
descended to 41000 feet where we continued until we began our descent into
Houston.

I didn't get any particularly warm fuzzies from the knowledge that the crew
on the flight deck flew for almost one half hour thinking that we were 2000
feet lower than we were. I don't know what the vertical separation between
planes is supposed to be. Were we in danger because of this error?

vertalop is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 11:58
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 90
The GPS was not showing the aircraft's altitude. It was showing the receiver's height above the WGS84 ellipsoid - a theoretical model of the earth. The pilot may have announced the aircraft's altitude as 41000ft, but it was not. It would have been Flight Level 410, which is 41,000ft above a standard pressure level of 1013.2 HPa - a nicety that most passengers are unaware of, and it's not really important (to the passengers) anyway.

Sorry, you can inform the author that he and his receiver aren't that clever!
reynoldsno1 is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 15:05
  #3 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Knight in Shining Armour
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Everywhere in the UK, but not home!
Fishing Journo perhaps????
Snigs is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 15:19
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 582
Likes: 5
From: Alps
Got to Malaga not so long ago and a PAX asked to speak to us, Nice chap said that he had used a GPS to follow our progress and that he was surprised when we said we were cruising at 35,000ft as his GPS said we were cruising at 36,000 plus ft, Captain explained the same as above posting...
springbok449 is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 18:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Supercalifragilistic
expialidocious
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
if he was so worried about safety...

...why was he operating a radio reciever in the cabin?
Memetic is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 18:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 553
Likes: 3
From: ex EGNM, now NZRO
Their GPS worked!

Mine doesn't work in the car or in the house, so how the hell did they get theirs to work inside an airframe?
Anti Skid On is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 19:51
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 1998
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: err, *******, we have a problem
... a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Moving to Tech Log....
Sick Squid is offline  
Old 12th June 2003 | 22:08
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
From: UK
not sure the WGS84 model would be that far out - as flight levels are based a 1013.25 mb standard it is more than likely that the sea level pressure was not at 1013, resulting in the difference.

gr
Golden Rivet is offline  
Old 13th June 2003 | 13:38
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Australia
GPS is inaccurate enough vertically to generate enough error, plus the FL/Alt conversion on top of that, plus a teensy bit of altimeter error, plus probably a tonne of receiver error in their little e-trex
*Lancer* is offline  
Old 13th June 2003 | 14:14
  #10 (permalink)  
Anthony Carn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
vertalop would appear to be in need of a CRM course (assuming, however, that CRM courses did any good in the first place) !

If he thought that there was a piloting error, then why did he not raise this with the cabin crew, who would have relayed it to the flight deck ?

Echoes of "I thought he knew which engine it was - duhh !"



In general, if you're a passenger and something does'nt seem to be as it should, then tell a member of the Cabin Crew (the one in overall charge is probably best). IMHO
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.