Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

737 Assumed Temperature Chart

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 Assumed Temperature Chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Mar 2002, 22:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: albuquerque nm usa
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 737 Assumed Temperature Chart

Hello,. .Would anyone happen to have a 737-300 Assumed temperature chart for reduced thrust takeoffs that they could email me? My address is [email protected]. .. .Thanks,. .Brad
737300737300 is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2002, 13:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,194
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Post

"Assumed temperature" is a method, or procedure, applied to a normal maximum thrust RTOW chart, when appropriate, to obtain a safe level of reduced thrust for the present takeoff. . .. .In essence, the (chart entry) OAT is presumed to be higher than the actual OAT to take advantage of a weight margin below the maximum for the day. The procedure is conservative as the aircraft's performance will reflect the actual OAT, not the presumed higher value. The end result is that the operator gains a small cumulative maintenance (cost) benefit associated with lower exhaust temperatures for the takeoff.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2002, 20:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

To what chart are you referring?. .. .If you want to be able to calculate the assumed temperature, you would need the OAT, QNH and A/C gross weight. Therefore, there is not normally a 'chart' as such, because the assumed temperature calculation is based on actual conditions, in conjunction with the airfield data.. .. .Most airlines produce their own performance manual containing all the data needed to calculate this, given the above parameters.. .. .Can you be more specific about what chart you are after?
regor is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2002, 20:16
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'm glad to see that I wasnt the only one confused by this request....... .. .Mutt. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="smile.gif" />
mutt is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 03:21
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,194
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Post

G'day, Mutt ..... . .. .Far better for a question to be asked rather than not. That way the concern can be resolved ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 04:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: a fence in the sun
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

John may disagree with this, but there are those who will say that you can enter the regular charts in the Flight Planning and Performance manual, not with ambient conditions to find RTOW, but with ATOW to find equivalent limiting ambient conditions, and thus an assumed temperature.. .. .Of course, the Flight PLanning and Performance Manual is only of academic interest as its data is so limited. With an enormous amount of time available, you might be able to have a stab at calculating the necessary figures for a take-off, but I wouldn't like to do it often! You'd need lots of data about obstacles too.. .. .Practically, individual charts for each runway (and often, various configurations of bleed, anti-ice, and runway conditions, braking actions etc) will be produced for the operator, by companies such as Flygprestanda, Jeppesen, et al. These charts incorporate a means of finding assumed temperatures for thrust reduction. So, there will not be a '737-300 Assumed temperature chart for reduced thrust takeoffs' per se as requested above.. .. .Hope this is helpful.
NorthernSky is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2002, 05:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,194
Received 105 Likes on 69 Posts
Post

NorthernSky,. .. .No problems there ... the practical dictates prevent other than a computerised interative analysis .. or else the conventional RTOW chart fudges.. .. .It is noteworthy that most operators/NAA impose some conservative level of fudge factor.. .. .I like Wal Stack's philosophy in the early QF reduced thrust days of the 707 ... a thousand feet pad of concrete was a reasonable thing ...
john_tullamarine is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.