Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Aircraft classification numbers/ pavement classification numbers

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Aircraft classification numbers/ pavement classification numbers

Old 12th May 2003, 01:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircraft classification numbers/ pavement classification numbers

Here’s one for any that use the Aerad supplements.

If an airport is showing a PCN 32/R/B/W/T can a B767-300 use this airport?
(Unrestricted use)
For a 767 rigid pavement, medium, has an ACN of 51 at 172819 kg and an ACN of 20 at 87926 kg. Can I interpolate to get an ACN of 32, which would be 120782 kg; this would be the max weight for unrestricted use.

Any comments appreciated.
nollocks is offline  
Old 12th May 2003, 07:27
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Where the Quaboag River flows, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 3,409
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The aircraft's ACN cannot exceed the PCN for the surface, but there's more to it. The PCN is, by definition the lowest strength section of the runway surface i.e. the touchdown area might be PCN 55 but the midfield might be PCN of 30 and the runway would advertised as having a PCN of 30.

Also, the PCN number is based on civil engineering requirements for a certain number of "passes" down the surface without damaging it. Typically for USAF CE, it is 10,000 passes. This means, for us, we can waiver a limited number of operations on the runway for aircraft exceeding the PCN. In other words, PCN usually has more to do with damage to the surface than airplanes sinking into oblivion.

GF
galaxy flyer is online now  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 09:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: UNNB-UNNT-OIMM-RJFR-RJBB-WXWX??
Age: 59
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the captain take into consiederation ACN/PCN relationship while determine MTOFW?
Belowclouds is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 03:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nollocks

Interpolation between the ACN values is acceptable.

Belowclouds

At the end of the day, the buck stops with the Captain, in the event of an accident (For ANY reason) he will be accused of operating the aircraft at a weight above a published limitation. Its therefore in his best interest not to do so!

Mutt.
mutt is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 04:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Belowclouds,

Yes, it must be taken into consideration unless you have a dispensation.

A MTOW calculation would typically include separate evaluation of WAT Limit, Field Length Limits, Obstacle Limits, Mbe limits, Structural Limits, and ACN Vs PCN Limits. The resultant MTOW is then the LEAST of the separate limits found above.

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.