Aircraft classification numbers/ pavement classification numbers
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: sweden
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aircraft classification numbers/ pavement classification numbers
Here’s one for any that use the Aerad supplements.
If an airport is showing a PCN 32/R/B/W/T can a B767-300 use this airport?
(Unrestricted use)
For a 767 rigid pavement, medium, has an ACN of 51 at 172819 kg and an ACN of 20 at 87926 kg. Can I interpolate to get an ACN of 32, which would be 120782 kg; this would be the max weight for unrestricted use.
Any comments appreciated.
If an airport is showing a PCN 32/R/B/W/T can a B767-300 use this airport?
(Unrestricted use)
For a 767 rigid pavement, medium, has an ACN of 51 at 172819 kg and an ACN of 20 at 87926 kg. Can I interpolate to get an ACN of 32, which would be 120782 kg; this would be the max weight for unrestricted use.
Any comments appreciated.
The aircraft's ACN cannot exceed the PCN for the surface, but there's more to it. The PCN is, by definition the lowest strength section of the runway surface i.e. the touchdown area might be PCN 55 but the midfield might be PCN of 30 and the runway would advertised as having a PCN of 30.
Also, the PCN number is based on civil engineering requirements for a certain number of "passes" down the surface without damaging it. Typically for USAF CE, it is 10,000 passes. This means, for us, we can waiver a limited number of operations on the runway for aircraft exceeding the PCN. In other words, PCN usually has more to do with damage to the surface than airplanes sinking into oblivion.
GF
Also, the PCN number is based on civil engineering requirements for a certain number of "passes" down the surface without damaging it. Typically for USAF CE, it is 10,000 passes. This means, for us, we can waiver a limited number of operations on the runway for aircraft exceeding the PCN. In other words, PCN usually has more to do with damage to the surface than airplanes sinking into oblivion.
GF
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nollocks
Interpolation between the ACN values is acceptable.
Belowclouds
At the end of the day, the buck stops with the Captain, in the event of an accident (For ANY reason) he will be accused of operating the aircraft at a weight above a published limitation. Its therefore in his best interest not to do so!
Mutt.
Interpolation between the ACN values is acceptable.
Belowclouds
At the end of the day, the buck stops with the Captain, in the event of an accident (For ANY reason) he will be accused of operating the aircraft at a weight above a published limitation. Its therefore in his best interest not to do so!
Mutt.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Belowclouds,
Yes, it must be taken into consideration unless you have a dispensation.
A MTOW calculation would typically include separate evaluation of WAT Limit, Field Length Limits, Obstacle Limits, Mbe limits, Structural Limits, and ACN Vs PCN Limits. The resultant MTOW is then the LEAST of the separate limits found above.
Old Smokey
Yes, it must be taken into consideration unless you have a dispensation.
A MTOW calculation would typically include separate evaluation of WAT Limit, Field Length Limits, Obstacle Limits, Mbe limits, Structural Limits, and ACN Vs PCN Limits. The resultant MTOW is then the LEAST of the separate limits found above.
Old Smokey
