Why are thrust reversers ineffective at low speed?
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Checkboard,
I think I've fallen into the trap of thinking that reverse thrust pushes against the surrounding airflow, the push being more effective at higher speed.
I thought the propulsive efficiency of the jet engine is greatest when there is a small difference in speed between the jet exhaust and the surrounding airflow, because the "push" is most effective then.
This doesn't make sense any more though!
Are you saying that thrust decreases with speed because the massflow through the engine decreases?
I think I've fallen into the trap of thinking that reverse thrust pushes against the surrounding airflow, the push being more effective at higher speed.
I thought the propulsive efficiency of the jet engine is greatest when there is a small difference in speed between the jet exhaust and the surrounding airflow, because the "push" is most effective then.
This doesn't make sense any more though!
Are you saying that thrust decreases with speed because the massflow through the engine decreases?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina, the Colonies you twit!
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A question about activating reverse thrust in large aircraft ...
It appears one would go to idle thrust at touchdown (mains), and following nose-wheel touchdown (I'm assuming a squat switch) the levers are pulled up and back to activate thrust reversers with the engines at idle.
Is this the correct GENERAL sequence?
Is it common to spool the engines back up while in reverse thrust (other than using RT for pushback) for short runway, for contaminated runway, or other possible over-run situations?
Just curious ...
Minh
It appears one would go to idle thrust at touchdown (mains), and following nose-wheel touchdown (I'm assuming a squat switch) the levers are pulled up and back to activate thrust reversers with the engines at idle.
Is this the correct GENERAL sequence?
Is it common to spool the engines back up while in reverse thrust (other than using RT for pushback) for short runway, for contaminated runway, or other possible over-run situations?
Just curious ...
Minh
It appears one would go to idle thrust at touchdown (mains),
and following nose-wheel touchdown (I'm assuming a squat switch)
the levers are pulled up and back to activate thrust reversers with the engines at idle.
Is it common to spool the engines back up while in reverse thrust