Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why are thrust reversers ineffective at low speed?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why are thrust reversers ineffective at low speed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2003, 00:05
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I may make an analogy - what would you expect to have the biggest effect on speed - opening a car door at 5 mph or 70 mph?

No equations necessary!
Mukka is offline  
Old 7th May 2003, 05:00
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,810
Received 133 Likes on 65 Posts
Mukka - there is a difference between drag and thrust.
Checkboard is online now  
Old 8th May 2003, 00:02
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Checkboard,
I think I've fallen into the trap of thinking that reverse thrust pushes against the surrounding airflow, the push being more effective at higher speed.

I thought the propulsive efficiency of the jet engine is greatest when there is a small difference in speed between the jet exhaust and the surrounding airflow, because the "push" is most effective then.
This doesn't make sense any more though!

Are you saying that thrust decreases with speed because the massflow through the engine decreases?
Mukka is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 00:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina, the Colonies you twit!
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A question about activating reverse thrust in large aircraft ...

It appears one would go to idle thrust at touchdown (mains), and following nose-wheel touchdown (I'm assuming a squat switch) the levers are pulled up and back to activate thrust reversers with the engines at idle.

Is this the correct GENERAL sequence?

Is it common to spool the engines back up while in reverse thrust (other than using RT for pushback) for short runway, for contaminated runway, or other possible over-run situations?

Just curious ...

Minh
Snakum is offline  
Old 8th May 2003, 07:11
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 5,810
Received 133 Likes on 65 Posts
It appears one would go to idle thrust at touchdown (mains),
Well, usually at some height above touchdown, like 30 feet or so...
and following nose-wheel touchdown (I'm assuming a squat switch)
Actually it varies, on the 733 it is at the earlier of 10 feet on either radalt, or air/ground logic (i.e. squat switch) activation, and the thrust levers at idle (the reverse levers won't rise unless the thrust levers are at idle.
the levers are pulled up and back to activate thrust reversers with the engines at idle.
Yep.
Is it common to spool the engines back up while in reverse thrust
This depends on company procedures. Using reverse thrust puts a little stress on various aeroplane bits, so some companies ask for idle reverse, unless the situation demands othersie (like a wet runway). An interlock will hold the piggyback levers at the first detent until the reversers are at least 60% deployed, after tat you can pull the levers back to increase reverse thrust. The amount of reverse thrust permitted to you varies with the aircraft and engine combination.
Checkboard is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.