Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Lies, damned lies, and engine performance data

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Lies, damned lies, and engine performance data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Apr 2003, 19:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lies, damned lies, and engine performance data

I've been taking a look at this engine made in Italy. It quotes some remarkable performance figures, but when you read the small print the tests were done at 2°C, 1048mb - or in other words somewhere in Italy there must be a dynamometer in a pressurised fridge.

Does anybody know of a reasonably reliable method to adjust IC engine performance figures like this to ISA/Sea-Level conditions so that I can try and reduce this to something meaningful (not to mention comparable with other engines that I know the behaviour of in a given aeroplane)?

P
Pilotage is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2003, 20:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: oxford
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2°C and 1048 mb corresponds to an air density of 1327 grammes per cubic metre, as opposed to 1225 at ISA MSL. This is 108.3% of ISA MSL density. In other words, at ISA MSL, the density would be about 92.3% of the test conditions.

I'm not an engine performance specialist, but I would have thought that someone who is would know a correlation between intake air density and performance.
oxford blue is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2003, 21:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Escapee from Ultima Thule
Posts: 4,273
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
horsepower = mep x displacement x rpm / 792,000


Since all bar mep is constant then I suppose reducing to ISA & comparing ratios would work. Not really sure though...
Tinstaafl is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2003, 13:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sydney
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The power output of a piston engine is proportional to the mass flow rate of air thru the engine (within typical operating conditions).

So Oxford Blue gave you the answer.

ET
EchoTango is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2003, 17:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Are you sure it's an engine? It looks more like a fridge compressor to me!

That would explain the high density test conditions.
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 2nd May 2003, 18:32
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a certain unique styling to it. Having been raised on the 1930s Flash Gordon movies (no I'm not that old, the BBC used to repeat them on BBC2 in the school holidays) I did wonder if Dr Zarkhof has retired to a life of Pasta and piston engine design.

ET, you are broadly correct, but only at I think constant mixture ratio. Mixture tends I think to vary with altitude with a venturi carb and is rarely stoichiometric I believe, it generally tends to be the rich side of that. Also, taking your statement as true...

- Is it linearly proportional, or some other function?
- Is the mass flow rate through a normally aspirated engine constant, a linear function of density, or some other function?

P

Still not sure, but we'll probably fly it anyway.
Pilotage is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.