Icing of upper wing surface.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Sunny SW!
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Icing of upper wing surface.
Do any of you clever boys & girls know where I might find guidance/ info. on upper wing surface icing?
I believe Boeing do have recommendations re tanking to ski destinations. The idea being that you don't want to descend with fuel cooled in the cruise in contact with the upper wing and thus greatly increasing the chances of icing.
I'd prefer Airbus data, they don't have such guidance but would be grateful for anything!
Many thanks
I believe Boeing do have recommendations re tanking to ski destinations. The idea being that you don't want to descend with fuel cooled in the cruise in contact with the upper wing and thus greatly increasing the chances of icing.
I'd prefer Airbus data, they don't have such guidance but would be grateful for anything!
Many thanks
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For the 757 you should plan to land with not more than 9 tonnes to avoid upper surface icing.
Ski destinations are probably less of a problem than humid destinations as you will probably be de-iced anyway and the relative humidity will be low. Humid destinations will cause condensation to freeze on the upper surfaces with more than 9 tonnes.
My company gives no guidance on 767s. Probably because it is unlikely you would plan to land with something like 24 tonnes.
Ski destinations are probably less of a problem than humid destinations as you will probably be de-iced anyway and the relative humidity will be low. Humid destinations will cause condensation to freeze on the upper surfaces with more than 9 tonnes.
My company gives no guidance on 767s. Probably because it is unlikely you would plan to land with something like 24 tonnes.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
13.5T on the A330 (our SOPs) with the solution to transfer the outer tank with the colder fuel to the inner with the warmer fuel and the fact that the outer tank fuel will no longer be in contact with the upper skin.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The SOP's in my company state for certain destinations (THR, AUH, DXB, BAH, CAI etc) that we should plan to land with less than 12 tons of fuel. I've actually had some icing in Dubai after a 6 hour flight with about 15 tons on board (this was before this 12 ton instruction; the value back then was 17 tons). This was a rather strange situation as the temperature was 22 degrees at the time, unfortunately the dewpoint was the same.....
Hope this helps.
P.S. I just saw I forgot to mention type : 767-300...
Hope this helps.
P.S. I just saw I forgot to mention type : 767-300...
Last edited by Frank M; 23rd Apr 2003 at 02:35.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: usa
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All,
Boeing has proposed to FAA and ATA (ALPA briefed) on their desire to allow departure with ice on the upper surface of the wings. Apparently SWA was the big gun in pushing for this. I don't know what specific proposals are but am confident of my source on this one.
Boeing has proposed to FAA and ATA (ALPA briefed) on their desire to allow departure with ice on the upper surface of the wings. Apparently SWA was the big gun in pushing for this. I don't know what specific proposals are but am confident of my source on this one.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lands End
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with that NOPERF.
Generally, the annoying patches of ice are no greater that 10 square feet on the wing root of the 737 NGs. There should be some reasonable limit for upper wing condensation frost caused by super cooled fuel. These ice patches generally manifest themselves several feet behind the leading edge, and I would be very surprised if engineering studies showed they represent a significant hazard.
I hope Boeing can modify the "Clean Wing Concept" with the FAA to introduce some common sense. The "Clean Wing Concept" was an overreaction to the Air Florida crash.
Generally, the annoying patches of ice are no greater that 10 square feet on the wing root of the 737 NGs. There should be some reasonable limit for upper wing condensation frost caused by super cooled fuel. These ice patches generally manifest themselves several feet behind the leading edge, and I would be very surprised if engineering studies showed they represent a significant hazard.
I hope Boeing can modify the "Clean Wing Concept" with the FAA to introduce some common sense. The "Clean Wing Concept" was an overreaction to the Air Florida crash.
