Derated thrust, Jet Engines.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: North West
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Derated thrust, Jet Engines.
We all know that to derate an engine for take-off will save on engine life. In terms of engine life where are the most savings gained, the first 1% of thrust reduction? Is there much point reducing power below 10% of max takeoff thrust?
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Biggleswade
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As turbine exit temps increase to the limit, the increase in engine life used increases exponentially. If you can get hold of the Harrier Engine Life graph, it shows the problem well.
An increase of tgt by only 10 deg C may increase damage by a 100, or even up to a 1000 times. Therefore, the lower the temp the better. So, for engine life, it's often better to use a slightly lower temp for significantly longer. (This is not the case for piston engines, however.)
The R-R CTP should be able to give chapter and verse on this, send me a private e-mail and I'll forward it on.
A
An increase of tgt by only 10 deg C may increase damage by a 100, or even up to a 1000 times. Therefore, the lower the temp the better. So, for engine life, it's often better to use a slightly lower temp for significantly longer. (This is not the case for piston engines, however.)
The R-R CTP should be able to give chapter and verse on this, send me a private e-mail and I'll forward it on.
A
