Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Vgmin???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2003, 18:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 97 Posts
Vgmin???

I suspect that this is probably John T's territory, but does anyone have the definition of Vgmin, please?
The context is the Honeywell FMS handbook, which quotes Vgmin as the basis for holding speeds, but doesn't give a definition. Again, from the context, I could guess that it is minimum groundspeed but have never come across that as a performance type parameter before. The rest of the defining para sees groundspeed as a basis for calculating min. holding speed by using instantaneous wind updates to generate CAS as an additive to groundspeed. Anyway, a 'book' definition of Vgmin would be helpful - TIA
Cornish Jack is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 08:50
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
... pass .....

have to admit to gross ignorance ... a new one for me in this Industry, although the abbreviation is not uncommon elsewhere ...
john_tullamarine is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 13:58
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 97 Posts
Thanks anyway, John.
This was raised with me from a friend who has since contacted Honeywell with the query. Their response was that this was an engineering reference which shouldn't have been incorporated in the handbook - (didn't say what it was, though!).
I did what I should have done first, and trawled through the 'stickies'. There is one reference there in abbreviations and acronyms to VG as Ground Velocity so maybe my guess in the thread opening wasn't far out. Would still like the definitive version, if anyone has it.
Cornish Jack is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 15:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CJ you auld Bu***r, thought you would have followed my lead t'other day. Go to Dogpile and type V Speed Definitions. The 5th result should give you header of Vg Diagram with faa website www1.faa.gov/fsdo/orl/files/pp/pres.ppt
This is a presentation explaining how Vg is determined and is, as I understand it, the Design Manoeuvering Speed (Va) for a specific weight and configuration. Other leads give sites which amplify Va but am sure you are up to speed (groan!)with that.
The powerpoint presentation runs automatically so you will need to right click and "reverse" in order to stop and study the diagrams. They are fairly complex but if you can't do The Telegraph crossword then you'll have little hope with these so you can always give me a call on Montag. Have a Bon w/e mon brave
4PON4PIN is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2003, 22:24
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
4PON4PIN,

I think that we are talking two entirely different things here. The "Vg" diagram to which you refer (more usually referred to as "nV") relates to design standards ... the post is looking at something which Honeywell developed in their internal procedures.
john_tullamarine is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 05:12
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Checked out a couple of FMC Supplementary Data documents, (B772/ B744/ B74C) they refer to VG as the "Ground Speed". Vmin is also defined as "Minimum Speed".

Putting the two of these together gives you the "Minimum Ground Speed", but i cant find that exact definition.

It should be noted that the VG speed is distinct from the VMCG speed and is used for cruise/holding calculations.



Mutt.
mutt is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 08:57
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 0
Received 156 Likes on 97 Posts
Thanks everyone - seems like the first guess was correct. I'll pass the details on.
4PON4PIN
Enough of the puns - not Montag, I'm watch and clocking all day - talk to you on Tuesday.
John T - I think that 4Ps may be correct, since the Honeywell response indicates that the reference is to an engineering based calculation. Anyway, they say that it should not have been included in the handbook so the relevance is decidedly less.
Again thanks to all.
Cornish Jack is online now  
Old 1st Feb 2003, 10:43
  #8 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,187
Received 97 Likes on 65 Posts
CJ,

In the absence of some definitive Honeywell docs I can only speculate ... but I suspect that the two are still totally unrelated ...
john_tullamarine is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.