Emergency descent
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bohol, Philippines
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Emergency descent
What is the current philosophy regarding a turn off the airway during an emergency descent?
Also has TCAS been evaluated during the emergency descent procedure?
Also has TCAS been evaluated during the emergency descent procedure?
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im the same as 18-wheeler, except Im more a 30 deg man and Im after 25nm off track.
Only exception is when in RVSM airspace which dictates 90 deg L or R if NOT in contact with an ATC unit. Only thing about RVSM emergency descent procedure is this minimise initial descent rate until 10nm off track which I disagree with. Given an explosive decompression at FL370 Ill get down as fast as I can, giving only prime consideration to the aircraft structural integrity and what the TCAS is showing (if fitted).
I havent read anywhere TCAS has been tested in an emerg descent. It may well have though. But remember TCAS operating laws take into account only 1 dimension of the 3-dimensional sky we fly in. Dont forget that the golden rule of "to avoid a colision each aircraft shall turn to the right" is just as valid now as it was 87 years ago. Might even save your life one day because TCAS only knows up and down. We pilots know theres a left and right too!
Only exception is when in RVSM airspace which dictates 90 deg L or R if NOT in contact with an ATC unit. Only thing about RVSM emergency descent procedure is this minimise initial descent rate until 10nm off track which I disagree with. Given an explosive decompression at FL370 Ill get down as fast as I can, giving only prime consideration to the aircraft structural integrity and what the TCAS is showing (if fitted).
I havent read anywhere TCAS has been tested in an emerg descent. It may well have though. But remember TCAS operating laws take into account only 1 dimension of the 3-dimensional sky we fly in. Dont forget that the golden rule of "to avoid a colision each aircraft shall turn to the right" is just as valid now as it was 87 years ago. Might even save your life one day because TCAS only knows up and down. We pilots know theres a left and right too!
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: delta.bc.canada
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The question of turning off the airway keeps coming up ,in view of certain 'congested'corridors etc. The 'turn 'itself was advocated by boeing to allow the nose to 'fall' through and get on'speed' quicker..Tcas is now 'selected' down(if you can)to 'see' the airspace.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TCAS will not issue RA's if ROD exceeds 10000fpm, if your bird can manage that.
IMHO there is a strong case to be made for selecting "TA only" in an ED, in order to prevent a co-ordinated RA being issued between your own and another mode S txpdr. This ensures that all the avoidance will be taken by the other a/c, given that you will not be changing trajectory until below 14000'.
Comments welcome.
IMHO there is a strong case to be made for selecting "TA only" in an ED, in order to prevent a co-ordinated RA being issued between your own and another mode S txpdr. This ensures that all the avoidance will be taken by the other a/c, given that you will not be changing trajectory until below 14000'.
Comments welcome.
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That suggestion is certainley worth mulling over WOK, esp in IMC. The question I have is, if 2 TCAS RA aircraft are coordinating, and one aircraft is ignoring RA commands, does the other (RA-obeying) aircraft's TCAS realise that the other one ISNT obeying?
If the obeying TCAS doesnt realise it, then you have a very strong case.
If the obeying TCAS doesnt realise it, then you have a very strong case.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slasher, TCAS II version 7 can command an RA reversal if the other aircraft doesn't follow it's own coordinated response - but only once. So if the aircraft DOES subsequently decide to follow it's RA (after you've been commanded to change direction), you will only get increase climb/descent commands rather than another actual reversal. That's how I read it anyway! 
TCAS III is just around the corner and will allow lateral guidance as well as vertical...
Lancer
TCAS III is just around the corner and will allow lateral guidance as well as vertical...
Lancer
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Further to Woks reply. Agree with the strong case for TA only mode.
The other thing to bear in mind is if you are doing an emergency descent, almost by definition you are fairly high, so there is a good chance that at least one of the aircraft is subject to climb inhibitions.
Got to go to work, so not a detailed response, but if you think about it, if the other guy can't climb, you are almost certain to get told to level off - ("Adjust Vertical Speed"), i.e. told to stop your emergency descent.
CPB
The other thing to bear in mind is if you are doing an emergency descent, almost by definition you are fairly high, so there is a good chance that at least one of the aircraft is subject to climb inhibitions.
Got to go to work, so not a detailed response, but if you think about it, if the other guy can't climb, you are almost certain to get told to level off - ("Adjust Vertical Speed"), i.e. told to stop your emergency descent.
CPB
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's exactly the scenario I envisaged. Think I may raise this with the tech bods at my company, tho' I suspect the answer will be ".....no point in changing anything since ACAS 111 is imminent..." or suchlike.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WOK and CPB,
Understand your points, but wonder if you would actually get a level off, or rather a reduction in the rate of descent... the computation would take into account your trajectory, so it wouldn't necessarily be anything as drastic as an 8000 fpm ROD change would it?
Having said that, will an intermediate reduction, or even level off for the 10 seconds an RA was commanded really affect the emergency descent significantly enough to consider switching RA off while the rest of the rapid decompression bedlam is going on?
Just trying to promote a bit of discussion here - it's an interesting topic!
Let us know what the techies said!
Lancer
Understand your points, but wonder if you would actually get a level off, or rather a reduction in the rate of descent... the computation would take into account your trajectory, so it wouldn't necessarily be anything as drastic as an 8000 fpm ROD change would it?
Having said that, will an intermediate reduction, or even level off for the 10 seconds an RA was commanded really affect the emergency descent significantly enough to consider switching RA off while the rest of the rapid decompression bedlam is going on?
Just trying to promote a bit of discussion here - it's an interesting topic!
Let us know what the techies said!Lancer
