Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

772 and 773 FMC max alt margin

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

772 and 773 FMC max alt margin

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2026 | 16:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
772 and 773 FMC max alt margin

Assuming smooth air, how much margin do you like to give to the FMC maximum altitude on the 777?



I’ve seen some people say as high as 2000ft. I’ve been 900ft below max (can’t recall if it was a 200 or 300) and thought the buffer was sufficient.


At my company, everyone seems to have their own “feel good” number. It’d be great to find something written down that I can reference the next time it comes up.



Thanks
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 28th May 2026 | 17:43
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 543
Likes: 338
From: Blue sky
Originally Posted by Check Airman
I’ve been 900ft below max (can’t recall if it was a 200 or 300) and thought the buffer was sufficient.
The reference you will find in the FCTM is related to maneuvering. Can't recall the numbers for the 777, but in general Boeing asks to limit the bank angle from 10kts above maneuvering speed (amber band). It's not the straight and level flying that is the issue, it is the banking and maneuvering.

Set the correct cg, limit the bank angle and you should be fine (ico turbulence you can always ask to descend if really necessary). Depending on how long you have to go and the local ATC environment, I've been 500ft below many times to avoid discussions further downroute (first come first served idea).

I've also been 100ft above, but that's a long story involving Chinese ATC with altitude restrictions at the entry waypoint and a subsequent unexpected speed restriction. Didn't feel uncomfortable, apart from the need to go into HDG SEL and limited bank angle.

Last edited by BraceBrace; 28th May 2026 at 17:58.
BraceBrace is offline  
Reply
Old 28th May 2026 | 19:00
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 581
Likes: 412
From: UK
Generally 1000ft. But partly depends if turbulence forecast. Don’t want to be sat in coffin corner with my hand on the speed brake for hours. If it’s smooth then wouldn’t be the end of the world 700-800ft or so. -200 and -300 have slightly different over bank protection. Think -300 more conservative?
Propellerhead is online now  
Reply
Old 28th May 2026 | 19:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Originally Posted by BraceBrace
The reference you will find in the FCTM is related to maneuvering. Can't recall the numbers for the 777, but in general Boeing asks to limit the bank angle from 10kts above maneuvering speed (amber band). It's not the straight and level flying that is the issue, it is the banking and maneuvering.

Set the correct cg, limit the bank angle and you should be fine (ico turbulence you can always ask to descend if really necessary). Depending on how long you have to go and the local ATC environment, I've been 500ft below many times to avoid discussions further downroute (first come first served idea).

I've also been 100ft above, but that's a long story involving Chinese ATC with altitude restrictions at the entry waypoint and a subsequent unexpected speed restriction. Didn't feel uncomfortable, apart from the need to go into HDG SEL and limited bank angle.
Thanks. I’ll see if I can get my hands on the FCTM. Most crews here would have an aneurysm if you suggested 500 below maximum.
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 28th May 2026 | 19:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 137
From: USA
Originally Posted by Propellerhead
Generally 1000ft. But partly depends if turbulence forecast. Don’t want to be sat in coffin corner with my hand on the speed brake for hours. If it’s smooth then wouldn’t be the end of the world 700-800ft or so. -200 and -300 have slightly different over bank protection. Think -300 more conservative?
Thanks. I’ll have to see if the bank protection is mentioned in detail in our manuals. I don’t remember reading that.
Check Airman is offline  
Reply
Old 29th May 2026 | 03:43
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 285
From: Moved beyond
Originally Posted by Check Airman
Thanks. I’ll see if I can get my hands on the FCTM. Most crews here would have an aneurysm if you suggested 500 below maximum.
The Cruise section of the FCTM describes how the FMC maximum altitude is defined. It is the lowest of:
  • maximum certified altitude
  • thrust limited altitude
  • buffet or maneuver limited altitude
The -200 and -300 (not the -300ER) tend to be thrust-limited at high altitude, and the maximum altitude is therefore determined by the available thrust rather than buffet limits. The FCTM states:
...available thrust may limit the ability to accomplish anything other than relatively minor maneuvering. The amber band limits do not provide an indication of maneuver capability as limited by available thrust.
In other words, if you start maneuvering at maximum altitude, the speed may decay and there may not be sufficient thrust to recover without descending. LNAV supposedly provides a bank angle limiting function that protects the commanded bank angle from exceeding the current available thrust limit. In any other mode, the FCTM recommends flying at least 10 knots above the lower amber band, using bank angles of 10° or less when operating at or near maximum altitude.

Many people have a "feel good" buffer they apply to the maximum altitude, but there's nothing official published. Strictly speaking a buffer is not required in smooth air provided maneuvering is limited to low angles of bank. However, given that it’s hard to predict if smooth air will continue, a buffer of about 1,000 ft below the FMC maximum altitude is reasonable at weights where the aircraft is likely to be thrust limited.

Last edited by BuzzBox; 29th May 2026 at 07:52.
BuzzBox is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.