Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Maneuvering airspeed for Airliners

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Maneuvering airspeed for Airliners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th January 2026 | 21:10
  #21 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
Again, the biggest problem with Va is the general misunderstanding of what it is about. The general understanding is in line with the relatively new term, Vo, and, I presume, in due course, we will all cease to worry about Va which is an engineering thing, rather than operational.

Often people confuse the "design manoeuvring speed Va" which is a FAR/CS-25 structure certification definition with "flap manoeuvring speed"

Va applies to light aircraft also.

Below Va, an airplane will withstand a single full application of a control surface

Caveat. If a full application would put the aircraft above the limit load factor, then the input has to be a checked manoeuvre.

aggressive riders use was being actively taught by an over zealous ex military instructor.

The upset recovery training program was brought to account post accident and subsequently amended. I guess that it is very difficult to train line pilots in the ways of certification test pilots. Mostly things work OK as we don't have aircraft falling out of the sky with no fins on a day by day basis ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2026 | 23:27
  #22 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 134
Likes: 103
From: Apple Maggot Quarantine Area
It’s also important to recognize that after AA587, in accordance with NTSB recommendations, the FAA actually did change the legal definition of how “Maneuvering Speed” is used in the AFM, per 14 CFR 25.1583. It is unfair to judge the pilot’s actions at the time of the accident against the current regulation and information provided to he flight crew today.

https://www.federalregister.gov/docu...tion-statement

Some good discussion on the addition of Vo to Part 23 as well.
slacktide is offline  
Reply
Old 8th February 2026 | 03:19
  #23 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
FARs

I think it more a case of trying to get the correct story through to the flying folk. The definition and associated conditions go back at least to the 50s.

The problem is more a case of the training side of the Industry not making sure that the story they give to the up and coming trainees is correct. Va has been one of my pet peeves for ever and a day.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.