A320 One Engine Taxi on arrival with APU INOP

Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 491
From: Europe
SETWA does not mean you don’t need a serviceable APU. What happens when you loose Gen1 during SETWA? You will be in EMER ELEC on BAT only with no nosewheel steering. All displays are lost. Can you now start engine 2 to recover some normalcy and resume taxi?

Joined: Aug 2009
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 616
Likes: 56
From: GPS L INVALID
Interesting logic, you're taxiing, not flying - why is nobody worried then about your running engine failing during single engine taxi? No such restrictions in the Boeing world... We don't start the APU for single engine taxi.
Last edited by STBYRUD; 18th January 2025 at 20:52.

Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 491
From: Europe
Because you will be as good as stuck on the taxiway. We don’t start the APU either on the NEO’s and modified older models. That’s the difference between SETWA and OETA. But the APU needs to be serviceable for both.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Tropics
MEL for CEOs and non-modified older models does not permit single-engine taxi operations with APU inoperative.
However there is no such prohibition for written NEOs and modified models in the MEL.
However there is no such prohibition for written NEOs and modified models in the MEL.
Last edited by dream747; 19th January 2025 at 03:03.


Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
12 years on the bus. Except for a few months when SETWA was being worked on, always (with the exception for some tight locations or steeper taxiways) single engine taxi, inbound and outbound, APU working or not. Nothing in the APU MEL for either CEO or NEO forbidding it. Risks/Chances of the single engine failing with the APU deferred, and problems associated with that failure (needing a tow, that is pretty much it) are apparently low enough (in the time I worked there, more than 5 million taxi movements without that one engine failing).

Joined: Dec 2005
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 340
From: Hong Kong

Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 491
From: Europe
12 years on the bus. Except for a few months when SETWA was being worked on, always (with the exception for some tight locations or steeper taxiways) single engine taxi, inbound and outbound, APU working or not. Nothing in the APU MEL for either CEO or NEO forbidding it. Risks/Chances of the single engine failing with the APU deferred, and problems associated with that failure (needing a tow, that is pretty much it) are apparently low enough (in the time I worked there, more than 5 million taxi movements without that one engine failing).
Anyway, just curious here. If you SETWA for departure with an INOP APU, you would have to cross-bleed start engine two during taxi. Did your company really expect you to do that?





