A330 / why is there one Wing Anti-ice P/B SW and two Eng' Anti-ice P/B SW??
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: South Korea
A330 / why is there one Wing Anti-ice P/B SW and two Eng' Anti-ice P/B SW??
what is different about Switch?
A330-200/300
why is there engine anti-ice P/B sw is two and Wing anti-ice P/B sw is one.
I think engine thrust? or engine asymmetry?
plz tell me why its different
A330-200/300
why is there engine anti-ice P/B sw is two and Wing anti-ice P/B sw is one.
I think engine thrust? or engine asymmetry?
plz tell me why its different



Joined: Nov 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 740
From: UK
No time to go and check the books, but I think that if you had one engine out, you would not want to use hot air from the other engine(s) to anti-ice that dead engine*. That would be a waste of power, which would not be desirable with one engine out.
But obviously you would never want to anti-ice only one wing !
*do engines only anti-ice themselves or does each engine contribute to anti-icing all engines ? Can't remember.
But obviously you would never want to anti-ice only one wing !
*do engines only anti-ice themselves or does each engine contribute to anti-icing all engines ? Can't remember.




Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,166
Likes: 1,096
From: UK
I think Eng anti ice is only from the onside engine. Usually a separate bleed off the compressor.
EG 787 does not use bleed air for air conditioning but it does have a single bleed for engine antice.
EG 787 does not use bleed air for air conditioning but it does have a single bleed for engine antice.

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach
No time to go and check the books, but I think that if you had one engine out, you would not want to use hot air from the other engine(s) to anti-ice that dead engine*. That would be a waste of power, which would not be desirable with one engine out.
But obviously you would never want to anti-ice only one wing !
*do engines only anti-ice themselves or does each engine contribute to anti-icing all engines ? Can't remember.
But obviously you would never want to anti-ice only one wing !
*do engines only anti-ice themselves or does each engine contribute to anti-icing all engines ? Can't remember.
👇
An independent air bleed from the high pressure compressor protects each engine nacelle from ice. Air is supplied through a two-position (open and closed) valve that the flight crew controls with two pushbuttons, one for each engine.
Each engine on his own.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: South Korea
If Engine anti-ice P/B is one, each engine bleed air(e.g. Trent 700 HPC 3th) can supply own enging lip skin.
I think its has another reason.. about.. engine thrust... or something
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: South Korea
I mean why Wing anti-ice P/B is not two?
If Engine anti-ice P/B is one, each engine bleed air(e.g. Trent 700 HPC 3th) can supply own enging lip skin.
I think its has another reason.. about.. engine thrust... or something
If Engine anti-ice P/B is one, each engine bleed air(e.g. Trent 700 HPC 3th) can supply own enging lip skin.
I think its has another reason.. about.. engine thrust... or something



Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,314
From: Everett, WA
Engine to engine isolation is a regulatory requirement, so you don't want a single failure (e.g. the engine anti-ice switch) to affect both engines. And the EAI systems are completely independent for each engine - no common ties.
Wing Anti-Ice is a single system - and as others have mentioned you would not want to have asymmetric wing icing - better to have it all off than to have it off on one side.
Wing Anti-Ice is a single system - and as others have mentioned you would not want to have asymmetric wing icing - better to have it all off than to have it off on one side.



Joined: Nov 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 740
From: UK
There is no need for two wing anti-ice P/Bs, because you would NEVER want - or need - to anti-ice just one wing and not the other
So there is simply no need for two switches, which would only add needless complication and no advantage whatsoever.
Having two wing anti-ice switches could also cause a serious problem if both wing anti-ice switches were pushed but only one actually stayed in, and this was not noticed until one wing stalled. Or if one switch became faulty.
You really don't want asymmetric lift.
So there is simply no need for two switches, which would only add needless complication and no advantage whatsoever.
Having two wing anti-ice switches could also cause a serious problem if both wing anti-ice switches were pushed but only one actually stayed in, and this was not noticed until one wing stalled. Or if one switch became faulty.
You really don't want asymmetric lift.



Joined: Jul 2013
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 3,314
From: Everett, WA






