Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A321neo differences

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A321neo differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Mar 2024, 06:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Neither here or there
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bobsmith3443
I found the auto thrust on the neos to be terrible other than that its the same aircraft
Even manual thrust is difficult on these machines. They are extremely sensitive.
CW247 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 08:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Italy
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fly mainly neos and I don't dare to cut thrust below 20 ft callout unless I have added a considerable amount of Vapp increment in case of strong crosswind. Spool down is faster than on the V2500, the engines are bigger and become massive drag generators.
enzino is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2024, 16:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never cut thrust until first RETARD call out. I indeed am firmly at idle stop prior to touchdown
321XLR is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 05:00
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by enzino
I fly mainly neos and I don't dare to cut thrust below 20 ft callout unless I have added a considerable amount of Vapp increment in case of strong crosswind. Spool down is faster than on the V2500, the engines are bigger and become massive drag generators.
That's not what Airbus says. According to airbus deceleration capability of CEO is more than Neos and that's why GSmini in Neo only uses .33 factor of actual gust unlike in CEO it uses factor of 1. Reference Safety first July 2017.
vilas is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2024, 17:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Italy
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know what Airbus says but my experience on the line has been different so far.
enzino is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 09:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 8000 feet of cabin altitude
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
That's not what Airbus says.
hahaha
speed freek is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2024, 10:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by HarimauMalaya
Hello friends,

I seek help to understand the Airbus A321neo aircraft better. I have started training on this and it is difficult to land. I hear similar story’s from experienced pilots.

The flare law is different from the A320/321ceo, as in the FCOM but can someone say why it is more challenging to land and share your experiences? Can you give sources other than the FCOM for more information?

Thank you!!!
I change between the CEO and NEO on a daily basis and have to say I have found no appreciable difference in handling between the 2 types. I don’t change my flying technique from one type to the other.

My advice would be don't over think it, it’s an Airbus, like any other.

The only thing I do is ensure I have minimum 5kts between Vapp and Vls. But I do that on both types, and it’s an old school thing for a cat C aircraft that should really be cat D.
Jonty is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.