A321neo differences
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Neither here or there
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Italy
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fly mainly neos and I don't dare to cut thrust below 20 ft callout unless I have added a considerable amount of Vapp increment in case of strong crosswind. Spool down is faster than on the V2500, the engines are bigger and become massive drag generators.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's not what Airbus says. According to airbus deceleration capability of CEO is more than Neos and that's why GSmini in Neo only uses .33 factor of actual gust unlike in CEO it uses factor of 1. Reference Safety first July 2017.
Hello friends,
I seek help to understand the Airbus A321neo aircraft better. I have started training on this and it is difficult to land. I hear similar story’s from experienced pilots.
The flare law is different from the A320/321ceo, as in the FCOM but can someone say why it is more challenging to land and share your experiences? Can you give sources other than the FCOM for more information?
Thank you!!!
I seek help to understand the Airbus A321neo aircraft better. I have started training on this and it is difficult to land. I hear similar story’s from experienced pilots.
The flare law is different from the A320/321ceo, as in the FCOM but can someone say why it is more challenging to land and share your experiences? Can you give sources other than the FCOM for more information?
Thank you!!!
My advice would be don't over think it, it’s an Airbus, like any other.
The only thing I do is ensure I have minimum 5kts between Vapp and Vls. But I do that on both types, and it’s an old school thing for a cat C aircraft that should really be cat D.