Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Green dot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2024, 08:01
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Green dot

Good morning,

A321 Neo… somebody knows why green dot is behaved like that at FL 390? And why there is a limit at 292kt?
michelda is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 15:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by michelda
Good morning,

A321 Neo… somebody knows why green dot is behaved like that at FL 390? And why there is a limit at 292kt?
what? behaved like what?

321XLR is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 15:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Middle East
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are you referring to the situation where Green Dot ends up below VLS? I thought that bug was fixed over 5 years ago?
RudderTrimZero is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 18:07
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

At FL390 green dot is not following “standard” law of increasing with altitude.
At GW of 100t, above FL300 green dot unchange
michelda is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 19:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East of Westralia
Posts: 682
Received 109 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by michelda

At FL390 green dot is not following “standard” law of increasing with altitude.
At GW of 100t, above FL300 green dot unchange
Seems the “law”‘doesn’t get followed from 70T and above FL350 either!
Airbus Aerodynamics can be a fickle subject.. :-)
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Old 21st Jan 2024, 21:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by michelda

At FL390 green dot is not following “standard” law of increasing with altitude.
At GW of 100t, above FL300 green dot unchange
Probably because 292kts is well above VMO.
Jonty is online now  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 00:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 54
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
How are you getting a 100t A321 to FL390?

I get a Rec Max of FL331 at 93.5t.
waterbottle is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 00:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vaguely recall this being addressed in one of the issues of the Safety First magazine.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 07:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: big green wheely bin
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by waterbottle
How are you getting a 100t A321 to FL390?

I get a Rec Max of FL331 at 93.5t.
I seem to remember that MTOM in a XLR is only 97T
Jonty is online now  
Old 26th Jan 2024, 07:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Taken on a NEO at FL390…. Fairly positive 292 knots would be destructive at that altitude!
hikoushi is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2024, 16:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Miami
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hikoushi

Taken on a NEO at FL390…. Fairly positive 292 knots would be destructive at that altitude!
that is a pretty narrow window between VLS and barber pole. What was your "OPT altitude" per the box?


321XLR is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2024, 17:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 3,211
Likes: 0
Received 23 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by 321XLR
that is a pretty narrow window between VLS and barber pole. What was your "OPT altitude" per the box?
From a Boeing guy that looks alright to me.
Then again what do I know.
(Checks door)
B2N2 is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2024, 19:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That looks fairly normal for a heavy A321 up high.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2024, 20:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 321XLR
that is a pretty narrow window between VLS and barber pole. What was your "OPT altitude" per the box?
IIRC around 375 - 380. REC MAX was pegged at 398. Was a nearly empty flight (COVID era) but fuel heavy. Climbed up to avoid being stuck way lower. VERY smooth day otherwise would typically never go that high above optimum (ask me why!).
hikoushi is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2024, 16:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Europe
Posts: 74
Received 19 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by B2N2
From a Boeing guy that looks alright to me.
Then again what do I know.
(Checks door)
Haha... That does look a bit tight for us bus guys actually. Not completely uncommon but usually we have some more margins when around optimum levels.
CaptainOrange is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 13:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That margin will be ok even in moderate turbulence. Checked more than once.
Gero is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2024, 15:46
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Green dot is always on VLS at MAX ALT in our 321 NEOs, whereas on the CEO there's usually a very small gap.
Mr Good Cat is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2024, 04:00
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks all for your replies!!

Just few more question. I think Airbus knows that at FL 390 is not possible to fly at 292 kt…..so why they inserted values instead of dashes or blank box?
I agree that at high altitude the green dot value is equal to vls, but how can be lower than at low altitude?
michelda is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2024, 07:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gero
That margin will be ok even in moderate turbulence. Checked more than once.
….how many times have you personally actually experienced legitimate moderate turbulence while flying with those performance margins? 🍻
hikoushi is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2024, 09:58
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by michelda
I think Airbus knows that at FL 390 is not possible to fly at 292 kt…?
You could do a straight 'unloaded' dive at FL390 at 292kt (like they do during manufacturer's test flights), and you'd be doing Mach 1 exactly. This won't break anything unless you put any significant load on (like a rapid yank to get your nose up), but I imagine the buffet is quite strong. Any load on the wings and you wouldn't technically be 'flying' at that speed of course, just high speed stalling

When they did the flight diving test on the 777-300 the T33 chase plane clocked them at 1.01M. Not sure of the altitude at which it happened.

Last edited by Mr Good Cat; 9th Feb 2024 at 10:11.
Mr Good Cat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.