Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Pitot-Static Tubes

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Pitot-Static Tubes

Old 25th Jan 2023, 20:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pitot-Static Tubes

Can someone explain why a pitot-static tube would be used instead of a conventional pitot tube?

The conventional pitot tube measures total pressure and sends this to the ASI, the static pressure from the static ports on the side of the aircraft is then fed to the ASI and whatever the static pressure is, it then offsets this (cancels) what the static pressure is when it came through the front of the pitot tube to give us dynamic pressure.

The pitot-static tube has the holes in the side of the tube 90 degrees to the airflow to obviously measure static pressure I presume then to calculate the dynamic pressure? Is this the case? If so what's the point of the static ports on the side of the aircraft for the ASI if the static pressure is known from the pitot-static tube?

stephen2688 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2023, 21:52
  #2 (permalink)  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,167
Received 89 Likes on 60 Posts
For the pitot-static system, proper, I can't bring to mind any aircraft which uses both a combined head and fuselage static ports - there should be no reason to do so.

The pitot bit is comparatively straightforward and, providing that dimensions are reasonable, errors generally aren't a major concern.

The static bit, on the other hand, can present significant difficulties to the designers to get within acceptable error boundaries. As to whether the designer goes for a combined mount or fuselage statics is up to the designer's assessment of which is the better way to achieve the design standards requirements.

If you are looking at an aircraft with both a combined head and fuselage statics, my guess would be that the fuselage statics are for some other purpose than the pressure instrument panel ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2023, 22:02
  #3 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,295
Received 135 Likes on 66 Posts
What John said. The placement of Pitot tubes is pretty simple since once you're out of the boundary layer you get a good total pressure. Static pressure is far messier. You need an area of without any meaningful local acceleration of the air (such as the curvature of the nose) - ideally a long, constant diameter body section - otherwise there is distortion of the static pressure measurement due to the acceleration (or deceleration) of the airflow over a curved surface.
The 767 used pitot statics, while the concurrently developed 757 had pitot tubes with body mounted statics. Go figure...
tdracer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.