Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Range of an 239 seater A321neo

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Range of an 239 seater A321neo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2022, 14:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: D
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Range of an 239 seater A321neo

Could you write me the maximum range of an A321neo with 239 seats?

For example Wizz Air. They fly between AUH and VIE about 4.254 km including avoiding Syrian airspace.

It looks like Wizz flies no longer than that so can fly both sectors with the same pilots.

But technically, how long could that airplane fly for an airline without weight restriction?
rangerove is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2022, 16:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: N5109.2W10.5
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerove
Could you write me the maximum range of an A321neo with 239 seats?
7400 Km according to Airbus.
Goldenrivett is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2022, 23:22
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: D
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Goldenrivett
7400 Km according to Airbus.
That is the theorerical range of an A321LR with additional fuel tanks that Wizz Air doesn't have. Airbus says that that the range of an A321XLR is 4.700nm (8.700km). But a 240 seater XLR can only fly 3.650nm (6760 km). 22% less than advertised. I cannot post links here, but there is a website called "WHAT CAN AND CAN’T THE A321XLR DO?" from epsilonaviation on wordpress. I wonder how long a 240 seater A321neo can actually fly.
rangerove is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2022, 03:12
  #4 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The official performance targets provided by sales and marketing are riddled with data traps. Even saw one (not Airbus) providing result sheet for a customer-specified mission where ZFW was used for cruise burn calculation.

The AFM data, on the other hand, are dead accurate. Take a brand-new piece from the factory, or a 16 year one from storage with worn engines (adjusted for perf. factor), and the airplane delivers exactly that. Assuming your atmo model for planning is accurate and hell they are (for decades already).
FlightDetent is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.